Search found 30 matches
- Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:28 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Reducing agents and standard reduction potential
- Replies: 1
- Views: 211
Re: Reducing agents and standard reduction potential
A reaction with a very negative standard reduction potential means that that species wants to undergo oxidation, the reverse (hence negative) of reduction, and lose its electrons as much as possible. As it oxidizes, it then causes the other species involved to become reduced as it gains its electron...
- Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:22 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: HW 15.63
- Replies: 2
- Views: 343
Re: HW 15.63
I'm not entirely sure what part of the problem this is in reference to, but -0.59 is the value you can get from
(38 kJ/mol / 8.314 x 10-3kJ/mol K)(1/310 K - 1/298 K)
You don't need ln(A) values at all to solve this problem
(38 kJ/mol / 8.314 x 10-3kJ/mol K)(1/310 K - 1/298 K)
You don't need ln(A) values at all to solve this problem
- Thu Mar 15, 2018 11:15 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: 14.97? Finding Ka?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 300
Re: 14.97? Finding Ka?
I believe Ka is the acid dissociation constant for HF
- Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:57 pm
- Forum: *Nucleophiles
- Topic: What is a nucleophile? [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2262
Re: What is a nucleophile? [ENDORSED]
A nucleophile is a chemical species that is attracted to positively charged particles; it's also in a sense the same as a Lewis base in that it acts as an "electron donor" to form bonds. I'm not sure about the second half of your question though
- Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:45 am
- Forum: Method of Initial Rates (To Determine n and k)
- Topic: Stoichiometric Coefficients
- Replies: 2
- Views: 534
Re: Stoichiometric Coefficients
Only the given experimental data should be taken into account when determining k and n with initial rates, and the coefficients should not play a role at all
- Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:38 am
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: Log vs ln
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1264
Re: Log vs ln
I would think it's always preferable to use ln since the first order reaction integrated rate law is based on the exponential decay equation that uses e
- Tue Feb 27, 2018 6:58 pm
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: 15.23 (c)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 318
Re: 15.23 (c)
The increase in the concentration of B is directly linked to a decrease in the concentration of A, and this decrease is modeled by (2 mol A/1 mol B)(.034 mol B/L), which is the amount of A that had to be used to produce the 0.34 M of B. Subtracting this amount from the initial concentration allows u...
- Tue Feb 27, 2018 6:51 pm
- Forum: General Rate Laws
- Topic: Finding reaction rate [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 788
Re: Finding reaction rate [ENDORSED]
Always moles for concentrations
- Tue Feb 27, 2018 6:42 pm
- Forum: Kinetics vs. Thermodynamics Controlling a Reaction
- Topic: 15.3 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 874
Re: 15.3 [ENDORSED]
In regards to the rate of formation of O 2 , first we find the rate of rxn for NO 2 which is the change in concentration over the change in time (130 mmol x L^-1 / 20 sec) giving us 6.5 mmol/sec The we see from the coefficients that the rate of formation of oxygen is 1/2 that of NO 2 , so it should ...
- Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:04 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: Solving for Q when given molarity and partial pressure
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2041
Re: Solving for Q when given molarity and partial pressure
Both molarity and partial pressures (in atm) can be entered into the reaction quotient, so for this it would be
(0.075M)2 x 1 atm / (1.0 M)2 x 1 atm, and any other value for partial pressure could be entered if stated in the problem as long as its in atm
(0.075M)2 x 1 atm / (1.0 M)2 x 1 atm, and any other value for partial pressure could be entered if stated in the problem as long as its in atm
- Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:09 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: 14.33
- Replies: 2
- Views: 441
Re: 14.33
In this case, it means Tl+ is being both oxidized and reduced to become two different products, Tl3+ and Tl(s)
- Fri Feb 23, 2018 2:02 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Reaction E [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 714
Re: Reaction E [ENDORSED]
E values are intensive properties, meaning that their values don't scale with the other components of the reaction
- Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:25 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Water in cell diagram
- Replies: 3
- Views: 445
Re: Water in cell diagram
I believe it's because many of the species are stated as being aqueous in these reactions, so the water is assumed to be present. Also water is neutral so it doesn't really contribute anything to the electron balance
- Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:16 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Cell diagram acidic/basic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 425
Re: Cell diagram acidic/basic
Yes because they contribute to the electron balance
- Fri Feb 16, 2018 2:10 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Acidic Conditions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 357
Re: Acidic Conditions
If the conditions are acidic you balance the half equations using H3O+ ions and if they're basic you balance using OH- ions
- Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:31 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: 9.69? I am in need of guidance please :)))
- Replies: 1
- Views: 485
Re: 9.69? I am in need of guidance please :)))
You were correct in multiplying the second equation by 3, but you need to also multiply the third equation by three because the 6 e- produced in the 2nd equation are going to be part of the reactants in the 3rd equation, which in its current state only shows 2 e-. These two equations can be combined...
- Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:08 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Self test 8.14A
- Replies: 2
- Views: 426
Re: Self test 8.14A
C6H12O6 + 6O2 -> 6CO2 + 6H2O
Then Products minus Reactants
6(-393.51 kj/mol) + 6(-285.83 kj/mol) - (-1286 kj/mol)
Which gave me -2808 kj/mol
It seems that we did the same method, maybe one of your signs was just mixed up or something
Then Products minus Reactants
6(-393.51 kj/mol) + 6(-285.83 kj/mol) - (-1286 kj/mol)
Which gave me -2808 kj/mol
It seems that we did the same method, maybe one of your signs was just mixed up or something
- Fri Feb 09, 2018 3:47 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Delta G= Wmax
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2488
Delta G= Wmax
Can someone explain what Wmax means? Also why are delta G and Wmax equal at constant T and P? What is the relationship between the two?
- Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:27 am
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Question about equation?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 376
Re: Question about equation?
C is the just heat capacity of the system which we need to use in order to understand how much energy is needed to cause the temperature change in question. I don't think that there is a way to go about solving these without knowing the heat capacity for the system, however most of the questions wan...
- Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:18 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Free Energy and Pressure
- Replies: 4
- Views: 480
Re: Free Energy and Pressure
Let's look at our equation dG = dH - TdS We remember that dH = dU + PdV, so any increase in pressure will result in a larger dH value If a larger dH value is entered into the equation at constant temperature, we get dG = dH - dS resulting in a large dG, or free energy, value as a result Therefore, a...
- Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:50 am
- Forum: Thermodynamic Definitions (isochoric/isometric, isothermal, isobaric)
- Topic: Extensive/Intensive Property [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 605
Re: Extensive/Intensive Property [ENDORSED]
Extensive properties depend of the amount of substance or matter measured while intensive properties, like boiling point and density, do not
- Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:31 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Exercise 8.45
- Replies: 1
- Views: 246
Re: Exercise 8.45
The standard enthalpy of formation for this reaction basically means that 358.8 kJ are absorbed per mole of S 8 OR 4 moles of C OR 4 moles of CS 2 , so it can't be written as kJ/mol. However, since this reaction only uses one mole of S 8 , then it makes sense that it's (1.25 mol S 8 )(358.8 kJ/ 1 mo...
- Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:23 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Question 8.55
- Replies: 1
- Views: 240
Re: Question 8.55
I think Lavelle said that it was a typo in the book and that the O2 in the second rxn is supposed to be 3/2, not 1, lol
- Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:18 am
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Hw #8.49 standard state
- Replies: 4
- Views: 603
Re: Hw #8.49 standard state
I think that it's just the nature of the textbook that when no explicit information about the conditions is given, it means that the reaction is occurring under standard conditions (298 K for thermodynamics)
- Fri Jan 19, 2018 4:07 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Problem 8.65
- Replies: 1
- Views: 214
Re: Problem 8.65
I'm sure there are multiple ways to do this, but what I did was: 2NO + O 2 -> 2NO 2 H = -114.1 kJ The standard enthalpy of formation for NO is 90.25 kJ and for O 2 , as a pure element, is 0 so 2(NO 2 ) - (2(90.25 kJ)+ 0 kJ) = -114.1 kJ // solving for NO 2 gives you 33.2 kJ Then: 4NO 2 + O 2 -> 2N 2 ...
- Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:56 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: C(v) and C(p)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 275
Re: C(v) and C(p)
Cp is greater than Cv because at constant volume, no work is being done so Cp is just equivalent to dU, but under constant pressure, expansion work takes place so you have to add the energy used for work (PdV) to dU
- Fri Jan 19, 2018 3:46 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: 8.19b
- Replies: 1
- Views: 151
Re: 8.19b
1.30 x 10^5 J is the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of the water to 100.0 C 1.45 x 10^5 J is the total amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of both the water and the copper to 100.0 C, obtained by adding 1.30 x 10^5 J (water) with 1.48 x 10^4 J (copper). Then you can find t...
- Fri Jan 12, 2018 3:28 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Heat Enthalpies We Need to Know
- Replies: 3
- Views: 249
Re: Heat Enthalpies We Need to Know
No, I believe he will provide the necessary heat capacities and enthalpies on the tests
- Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:00 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: 8.49
- Replies: 5
- Views: 396
Re: 8.49
I think if there is no temperature explicitly stated, 298 K is just the standard temperature used in thermodynamics
- Thu Jan 11, 2018 4:47 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Compression vs Expansion
- Replies: 3
- Views: 468
Re: Compression vs Expansion
Yes. Since work (at constant external pressure) is calculated by w= -P*delta V where delta V is (Vf-Vi): Any expansion will give us a positive delta V value as V final > V initial , resulting in a negative value for work. Similarly for compression, the delta V value will be negative as V final < V i...