Search found 57 matches
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 10:30 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: Catalyst and Intermediate
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1075
Re: Catalyst and Intermediate
A catalyst will be used up in a step in the reaction mechanism but gets produced again in a different step. An intermediate gets produced in a step of a mechanism but gets consumed in another. Also, a catalyst can be included in the overall rate law, while an intermediate cannot.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 1:20 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: Nernst Equation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 416
Re: Nernst Equation
I believe the Nernst equation on the equation sheet with log(Q) assumes that the temperature is 298 K (25oC), while the ln(Q) equation can take into account any temperature.
- Wed Mar 14, 2018 4:30 pm
- Forum: *Enzyme Kinetics
- Topic: Enzymes in rate law
- Replies: 4
- Views: 761
Re: Enzymes in rate law
Yes, because the concentration of catalysts affect the reaction rate, the higher the concentration, the faster the reaction!
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:22 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: 15.65 b [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 355
Re: 15.65 b [ENDORSED]
I believe that when it asks about the reaction, it generally means the forward direction, unless otherwise stated. In this case, the reaction is endothermic because the activation energy of the forward direction is greater than the activation energy of the reverse reaction, which means that the forw...
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 2:13 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Identigying Anode/Cathode when just given species names and concentrations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 552
Re: Identigying Anode/Cathode when just given species names and concentrations
Given the species, you can generally predict which reaction will be the reduction and oxidation from a given list of reactions and their standard reduction potentials. The more positive Eo, the stronger the oxidizing agent is, and the more likely that the species will be reduced.
- Mon Mar 12, 2018 1:53 pm
- Forum: Third Law of Thermodynamics (For a Unique Ground State (W=1): S -> 0 as T -> 0) and Calculations Using Boltzmann Equation for Entropy
- Topic: 9. 35 and Cv vaues
- Replies: 1
- Views: 366
Re: 9. 35 and Cv vaues
I was wondering this as well.. I used (3R/2) as Cv for all three gases, and I still got B < C = A, the same result as the one on the "Errors in Solution Manual" page.
- Mon Mar 05, 2018 10:02 pm
- Forum: Kinetics vs. Thermodynamics Controlling a Reaction
- Topic: HW 15.23
- Replies: 2
- Views: 505
Re: HW 15.23
You do end up using the natural log (ln) in this calculation, after you solve for the [A]t! After you get that value, you plug it in
k = (ln([A]0/[A]t)) / t to get k.
k = (ln([A]0/[A]t)) / t to get k.
- Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:49 pm
- Forum: Kinetics vs. Thermodynamics Controlling a Reaction
- Topic: Question about Test #3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 411
Re: Question about Test #3
From #45-73 for sure, but there may be integrated exercises (#79 onwards) that might apply to the topics we learned in 15.1-15.6, so i would take a look there just to make sure.
- Mon Mar 05, 2018 9:46 pm
- Forum: Second Order Reactions
- Topic: 2nd order rxn integration
- Replies: 2
- Views: 355
Re: 2nd order rxn integration
When you take the integral of the -d[A]/[A]2, it gets cancelled out. I attached the step by step integration below:
- Fri Mar 02, 2018 3:39 pm
- Forum: General Rate Laws
- Topic: Question 15.39 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 532
Re: Question 15.39 [ENDORSED]
Since it was specified that the reactions are second-order, we can use 1/[A] = kt + 1/[A]0, and just solve for t.
- Fri Mar 02, 2018 3:30 pm
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: Pseudo-First-Order Reactions [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 511
Re: Pseudo-First-Order Reactions [ENDORSED]
We may be asked to identify/recognize when we can implement the pseudo-order reaction method, such as when the concentration of one or more reactants are far greater than the concentration of another reactant. Then you would just calculate the rate as if it were a normal ____ order reaction.
- Fri Mar 02, 2018 3:24 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: k prime vs k [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5050
Re: k prime vs k [ENDORSED]
From what I understand from today's lecture, k is the normal rate constant for a reaction, let's say for rate = k[A] N [B] M [C] L . However, if [B] 0 and [C] 0 >> [A] 0 , we can say that rate = k'[A] N , and that the reaction is a pseudo-first order reaction. Comparing the two, we can see differenc...
- Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:17 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: 14.13 part D
- Replies: 2
- Views: 380
Re: 14.13 part D
I was wondering this as well, since Au3+ is supposed to be on the products side. It may have been a solution manual error.
- Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:12 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: 14.9
- Replies: 2
- Views: 438
Re: 14.9
Since the equation is balanced, you can take a half-reaction from that equation to find the number of electrons, n r . When 2 Ce 4+ --> 2 Ce 3+ , we can see that the overall charge on each side goes from +8 to +6, so, in order to balance that, two electrons need to be added to the left side. This is...
- Mon Feb 19, 2018 5:08 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: 14.19
- Replies: 1
- Views: 239
14.19
In the calculation of the standard potential for the left (Metal) reduction, how come the sign of the Cu oxidation potential doesn't become negative? Initially, I had: E o (left) = E o (right) - E o (cell) = -0.34 - 0.689 = -1.029 But when I checked the answer, it was -0.349, meaning the potential o...
- Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:03 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Spontaneous Change
- Replies: 1
- Views: 243
Re: Spontaneous Change
In the book, it says that a spontaneous process has a natural tendency to occur, so it may not even occur at all, depending on the rate of that tendency (which will be covered in Ch. 15)
- Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:59 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: work and free energy
- Replies: 2
- Views: 325
Re: work and free energy
The change in free energy (delta G) for a spontaneous process is the energy that is available to do useful work. We were also given an equation in lecture, wmax = delta G, where maximum work is done by a process at constant temperature and pressure. Hope that helps!
- Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:52 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Reversible, isothermal reactions
- Replies: 1
- Views: 352
Re: Reversible, isothermal reactions
A similar question/post was posted on Chemistry Community a few weeks ago:
viewtopic.php?f=128&t=26506
Someone said while not all isothermal reactions are reversible, reversible reactions are isothermal.
viewtopic.php?f=128&t=26506
Someone said while not all isothermal reactions are reversible, reversible reactions are isothermal.
- Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:47 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Residual Entropy
- Replies: 1
- Views: 287
Re: Residual Entropy
Residual entropy is the entropy of a sample at T = 0, that comes from positional disorder surviving at that temperature. In other words, it is the disorder retained by some solids at T = 0.
- Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:43 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Self test 8.14A
- Replies: 2
- Views: 426
Re: Self test 8.14A
I also got the same answer as Kelly! Make sure to double check your signs, you may have misplaced a negative sign or positive sign.
- Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:38 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Calculating the change in entropy with constant pressure
- Replies: 2
- Views: 421
Re: Calculating the change in entropy with constant pressure
I would stick with using C(p,m) in that deltaS equation, which as said by Joyce, is (5/2)R at constant pressure.
- Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:32 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: 11.99
- Replies: 2
- Views: 411
Re: 11.99
By the way, the table for bond dissociation energies is Table 3.3, which is page 93 in the textbook!
- Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:24 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Definitions (isochoric/isometric, isothermal, isobaric)
- Topic: delta U [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3051
Re: delta U [ENDORSED]
Yes, like Mitch said above, delta U has two components, as seen in the equation deltaU = q + w (the first law of thermodynamics). Even if change in temperature is 0, and q is 0, work can still be done and affect internal energy.
- Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:38 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Units of ΔS
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3435
Re: Units of ΔS
From what I’ve seen, delta S is given in both J/K and J/K•mol-1 depending on the context of what you need it for! (Ive always assumed that the “per mole” is implied)
- Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:34 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: entropy vs. Degeneracy
- Replies: 4
- Views: 574
Re: entropy vs. Degeneracy
We can also view entropy as representative of the amount of energy that is unavailable to do mechanical work in a closed system!
- Sat Feb 03, 2018 10:26 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Delta S, H, and G
- Replies: 2
- Views: 224
Re: Delta S, H, and G
Like Michelle, I assumed the r subscript stood for reaction, but when I looked it up, it said r stood for rotational?
- Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:35 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using First Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: 8.61 Question
- Replies: 2
- Views: 196
Re: 8.61 Question
Yes, what Ammar said above is true! In addition, as you work through the problem you can see that you'll have to get rid of N2, which isn't in the net equation, and flipping the second equation is the only way to get rid of it.
- Mon Jan 22, 2018 8:11 pm
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: Equipartition Theorem - Test 1
- Replies: 1
- Views: 359
Re: Equipartition Theorem - Test 1
Hi! For test 1, Lavelle said to look through Outline 1 on his website for the concepts we will be tested on, except for isothermal problems. Since the equipartition theorem is not on there, I would say that we don't need to study it.
- Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:20 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: 8.25
- Replies: 2
- Views: 249
Re: 8.25
You can also look at it as finding the q of the reaction, or qrxn. So, using the relationship of qrxn = -qcal, your calculated value of the specific heat of the calorimeter and the change in temperature, you can find the solution (much like how Joyce did!)
- Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:15 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: units for calculating work
- Replies: 6
- Views: 599
Re: units for calculating work
I would stick with atm for pressure and liters (L) for volume when calculating work using w=-P*deltaV.
- Thu Jan 18, 2018 10:11 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: HW 8.21
- Replies: 2
- Views: 217
Re: HW 8.21
Going by the sig figs of the given values, I agree that it should be 3 sig figs. (Maybe the book isn't as strict with sig figs, I'm not sure)
- Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:03 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Intensive vs extensive property
- Replies: 3
- Views: 315
Re: Intensive vs extensive property
Yes! To add on to what Lisa said, intensive properties only depend on the type of the substance, so no matter the size or amount of substance you have, the property does not change. For example, the color of copper does not change whether you have 2 g of it or 50 g.
- Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:56 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Calculating required heat
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7413
Re: Calculating required heat
I don't really get why you need to add the heat of the kettle and the heat of the water together. I thought it was just asking for the heat supplied to the kettle to heat it up to 100 degrees Celsius. Hi, I assume you mean it was just asking for the heat needed for the water to boil. We need to tak...
- Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:07 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Molar heat capacity of gas
- Replies: 3
- Views: 328
Re: Molar heat capacity of gas
Gas has two molar heat capacities because there is one for constant volume (Cv) and one for contant pressure (Cp) !
- Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:46 pm
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: titration
- Replies: 3
- Views: 291
Re: titration
Since Dr. Lavelle didn't cover it in lecture or included it in the topic outlines on his website, I believe we don't need to know it for the final!
- Sat Dec 09, 2017 9:43 pm
- Forum: Acidity & Basicity Constants and The Conjugate Seesaw
- Topic: Conjugate seesaw
- Replies: 3
- Views: 632
Re: Conjugate seesaw
The conjugate seesaw is a term describing the relative strength of an acid/base to its conjugate base/acid. The stronger the acid, the weaker its conjugate base. The stronger the base, the weaker its conjugate base.
- Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:27 pm
- Forum: Lewis Acids & Bases
- Topic: What tables should we know from the book?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 721
Re: What tables should we know from the book?
If I recall correctly, the only table we were meant to be quite familiar with was Table 17.4. The other tables in the chapters we've discussed may be helpful in understanding concepts, but I don't believe we have to have them memorized.
- Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:19 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: Oxidation Numbers
- Replies: 2
- Views: 396
Re: Oxidation Numbers
Hi! Oxidation numbers are not always positive! For example, for a sulfur ion S^2-, its oxidation number is -2.
- Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:45 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Alphabetical Order
- Replies: 2
- Views: 304
Re: Alphabetical Order
Well, I can see why NH3 will come before the Cl, because it is called ammine, while the chloride is called chlorido. I'm not too sure why NO2, or nitro, comes before chlorido though.
- Mon Nov 27, 2017 5:40 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Problem 17.31 d [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 500
Re: Problem 17.31 d [ENDORSED]
That might have just been a book error, or maybe a rare exception to the rule, because according to Toolbox 17.1 we do name ligands in alphabetical order!
- Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:37 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Electronegativity
- Replies: 3
- Views: 585
Re: Electronegativity
Yes! We take both the geometry of the molecule as well as the electronegativity of each atom in that molecule to determine polarity. We can use the periodic table and its trends to determine which atom is more electronegative than the other (but take note of the exceptions to this rule - such as the...
- Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:32 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: HW 4.73
- Replies: 2
- Views: 644
Re: HW 4.73
Also, we know that CH2 has a larger bond angle than CH4 because CH2 has less electron regions, only 3, so when we apply the electron repulsion theory, they can be further apart from each other than a molecule with 4 electron regions. Hope that helps!
- Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:29 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: HW 4.73
- Replies: 2
- Views: 644
Re: HW 4.73
Yes, CH2 would have a bond angle less than 120 due to the lone pair! The so-called electron "cloud" takes up a large volume of space, and electron repulsion from that lone pair pushes down on the bond angles.
- Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:12 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: 4.1 Lone pairs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 881
Re: 4.1 Lone pairs
Here is a diagram clarifying what Ashley said above! You can see that the 3 lone pairs and their electron "clouds" have repulsion, such that the bonds between the central atom and the two other atoms are manipulated to a linear shape. https://image.slidesharecdn.com/tang04-vsepr-1209261830...
- Wed Nov 15, 2017 8:07 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Benzene Hybridization [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1663
Re: Benzene Hybridization [ENDORSED]
Yes, just to reiterate, every single bond, as well as the first bond (so only 1!) in a double or triple bond, counts as a sigma bond.
- Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:58 pm
- Forum: Dipole Moments
- Topic: Polar and non-polar molecules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 423
Re: Polar and non-polar molecules
For me, how I identify polar vs nonpolar molecules is by looking at the lewis structures of the molecules, and determining whether on not the shape allows for dipoles (if there are any) to cancel. Take two common examples: CO2 and H20. When you draw the lewis structure for H20, you'll see that the s...
- Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:52 pm
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Hydrogen Electronegativity
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5617
Re: Hydrogen Electronegativity
From what I understand, hydrogen has relatively high electronegativity, especially compared to the other elements in its group, due to only having one electron in its 1s shell. Atoms are more stable and "happiest" with a full shell, so hydrogen has a higher tendency to attract an electron ...
- Wed Nov 08, 2017 1:44 pm
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Atomic/Ionic Radius [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 293
Atomic/Ionic Radius [ENDORSED]
For test 3 question 2b, we had to place Cl, Na, and Br- in increasing atomic or ionic radius. I had them in the order of Cl < Br- < Na, but the correct answer was Cl < Na < Br-. I understand that Br- is larger than the neutral atom Br due to the extra electron, but how is it larger than Na, when the...
- Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:29 pm
- Forum: Limiting Reactant Calculations
- Topic: Post-Module Assess. #31 and #33
- Replies: 1
- Views: 370
Re: Post-Module Assess. #31 and #33
31. Using the mole ratio provided in the chemical equation, 1 mole of A means that you'll use 0.5 moles of B. (You could convert this into grams if you know the grams per mole of B). 33. Since the limiting reagent is A, the max amount of product you could produce has to be calculated from the amount...
- Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:44 pm
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Carbon Electron Affinity [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 475
Re: Carbon Electron Affinity [ENDORSED]
Like Nina said above, periodic trends are not always 100%! There are some exceptions to the "rules" that apply generally to the elements.
- Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:37 pm
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Electron affinity [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 530
Re: Electron affinity [ENDORSED]
Electron affinity, the change in energy when an electron is added to a neutral atom to form a negative ion, affects elements/electrons in the sense that the higher the electron affinity, the greater the attraction for a electron/the easier it is for that element to gain electrons.
- Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:33 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Post Module #19
- Replies: 3
- Views: 564
Re: Post Module #19
I believe the answer is D! A, B, and C all describe the same equation, which has to do with the photoelectric effect. The equation for D was not derived as a result from the photoelectric experiment!
- Mon Oct 16, 2017 8:28 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Post Module #24
- Replies: 3
- Views: 381
Re: Post Module #24
I believe the answer is UV! If I'm not mistaken, ultraviolet radiation is used because it has a short wavelength (high frequency), which means it has a higher energy per photon (E=hv). Even with low intensity light, it can eject electrons from the surface.
- Sat Oct 14, 2017 1:59 pm
- Forum: Bohr Frequency Condition, H-Atom , Atomic Spectroscopy
- Topic: Question about Balmer Series [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1789
Re: Question about Balmer Series [ENDORSED]
Hi! Since we are referring to the Balmer series, after the excited electron moves from a higher energy level back down to n=2, it does not move down to n=1, because then we'd be referring to the Lyman series. I've included a link to an image similar to the one shown in Friday's lecture, which hopefu...
- Tue Oct 10, 2017 12:07 am
- Forum: Bohr Frequency Condition, H-Atom , Atomic Spectroscopy
- Topic: Balmer and Rydberg series
- Replies: 3
- Views: 468
Re: Balmer and Rydberg series
From what I understood from the reading, the Balmer series is made up of lines in the visible spectrum. I'm assuming you mean the Lyman series, not the Rydberg series (because there was only mention of a Rydberg constant in the book). The Lyman series is made up of lines in the ultraviolet spectrum....
- Thu Oct 05, 2017 11:19 pm
- Forum: Limiting Reactant Calculations
- Topic: M9
- Replies: 4
- Views: 746
Re: M9
It said on the website that the test will cover Fundamentals, so I'm assuming we will have to know some of the concepts in the textbook in that section that weren't covered in class. I'm not entirely positive though!
- Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:14 pm
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: M21
- Replies: 1
- Views: 290
Re: M21
Hello Rita, From what I recall, there's a system of writing chemical formulas called the Hill system. Whenever a chemical formula contains carbon atoms, carbon is listed first, then hydrogen (if it contains hydrogen), then the rest of the elements in alphabetical order. If there are no carbon atoms,...