Search found 51 matches
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:48 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Test #2 Question 5B
- Replies: 2
- Views: 561
Re: Test #2 Question 5B
You also don't have to reverse the equations because you're comparing all 3 of their reduction potentials. When reversing the equation and flipping the sign, you're not looking at its reduction potential anymore but its oxidation potential and you can't compare that to the reduction potentials of th...
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:30 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: units
- Replies: 2
- Views: 427
Re: units
I guess it depends on the equation you're looking at because the one with delta G = delta H - T x delta S, the units of G would be H(j/mol) - T(K)S(j/mol.K) and would result in j/mol
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:27 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: 14.33
- Replies: 2
- Views: 630
Re: 14.33
I agree with Justin and you have the right idea. The reaction needs to be spontaneous for it to run, so that means delta G needs to be negative, which is the opposite of what's provided.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:23 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Test 2 Question 6 Part B
- Replies: 1
- Views: 358
Re: Test 2 Question 6 Part B
For this problem, the detachable sheet with the reduction potentials is handy to have because it will tell you V, and that will help you determine which half reaction will be reduction/oxidation. This is because you want your Ecell to be positive, so you would want Ecathode to be more positive than ...
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:21 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Value of n
- Replies: 3
- Views: 650
Re: Value of n
Yes, the moles isn't referring to moles of a certain element but just the number of electrons transferred.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:20 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Winter 2013 final Q4
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1183
Re: Winter 2013 final Q4
Yeah, n=4 and that refers to electrons moved because this type of n is a pure number and not moles.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:15 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Lecture 3/14
- Replies: 3
- Views: 515
Re: Lecture 3/14
Yeah, you just generally want to try to make the Ecathode - Eanode a positive number because then it will proceed spontaneously and that's what you want your cells to do. So just see the V when looking at the reduction potentials and reverse the right equation so that you can try your best to keep E...
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:11 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Eletro chem Test
- Replies: 4
- Views: 709
Re: Eletro chem Test
So I think what you need to do is look on the detachable sheet that contains all the reduction potentials and look for the ones that apply to O3/O2,OH- and O3,H+/O2. Then, based on what the reduction potentials are, you can decide which half reaction should be the cathode/anode because you want the ...
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:08 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Test 2
- Replies: 2
- Views: 449
Re: Test 2
I think based off of someone else's question on their test 2 #1, I saw that C is indeed 4+ once in CO2 and the reduced species is oxygen because it goes from 0 in O2 to -2 in CO2
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:04 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Test 2 #1
- Replies: 6
- Views: 866
Re: Test 2 #1
The C in O2 is 4+ because the O is 2-, but the overall charge is 0, so 2 x -2 would mean C needs to be +4. And O2 is reduced because O in O2 has 0 charge but in CO2 it has a 2- charge, meaning it was reduced.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 7:01 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Adding OH
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1002
Re: Adding OH
Yeah, for the whole shebang in a basic solution, you first balance O with H2O, also, you need to add H2O on the side that needs H, and then OH- on the opposite side
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:59 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Equations: ln Q vs. log Q [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1742
Re: Equations: ln Q vs. log Q [ENDORSED]
They're "interchangeable" in the sense that you can choose to use log or ln but they're right in saying there is a difference in how you use each one, so you can't just substitute one with the other plainly. ln(X) = 2.303log(X) is the biggest thing to remember when deciding which path to t...
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:39 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Calculating Gibbs Free Energy
- Replies: 4
- Views: 664
Re: Calculating Gibbs Free Energy
It all depends on what is available to you and then with that, you'd be able to decide what to use. But there's usually a chemical equation or steps when it's a difference of sums situation.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:35 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: 9.101 (b)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 458
Re: 9.101 (b)
For b), you would use delta S = q/t except you know the interior is warmer than the exterior, so the fraction for the exterior will be bigger due to the smaller denominator. So for that reason, you know the change in entropy would be greater for the exterior than interior.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:29 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: delta s surroundings
- Replies: 3
- Views: 641
Re: delta s surroundings
where did the time in time x t come from?
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:26 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Delta S
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1179
Re: Delta S
I agree with Lily when she says that the main takeaway from the second law is that delta S total is always increasing and not 0 or decreasing. And yes, for spontaneity, you have to check delta H enthalpy and temperature as well to be sure about whether or not a process will be spontaneous.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:23 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Spontaneity question
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1061
Re: Spontaneity question
Yeah, I'd say it's safest to check it through Gibbs free energy just because the sign of delta G would be able to tell you for sure whether or not something is spontaneous and it's the combination of multiple things apart from just delta S.
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:21 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Practice Midterm
- Replies: 2
- Views: 487
Re: Practice Midterm
Yeah, I agree with what Diane said but I feel like it being completely false is a little unfair of a generalization. I think a lot of the time delta S happens to be positive so it is true that an endothermic reaction is favorable at high temperatures but it is true that negative entropy would throw ...
- Sat Mar 17, 2018 6:17 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Second Law application
- Replies: 3
- Views: 652
Re: Second Law application
I also was wondering the same thing, where delta G would still be negative (spontaneous) even if delta S were negative, as long as the reaction was exothermic enough (delta H is a large negative).
- Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:19 am
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using First Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: What's up with Torrs
- Replies: 2
- Views: 492
What's up with Torrs
8.9 An ideal gas in a cylinder was placed in a heater and gained 5.50 kJ of energy as heat. If the cylinder increased in volume from 345 mL to 1846 mL against an atmospheric pressure of 750. Torr during this process, what is the change in internal energy of the gas in the cylinder? Apart from findin...
- Thu Mar 15, 2018 3:53 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Standard Gibbs
- Replies: 3
- Views: 765
Standard Gibbs
Can someone give me a concise explanation of what standard means? Or when Delta G has that little degree sign following it. This also shows up in other formulas.
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:08 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Cell Diagram Structure
- Replies: 3
- Views: 411
Cell Diagram Structure
What does a cell look like and are there any rules for how they're drawn out?
- Tue Feb 20, 2018 5:07 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: List of Steps for Redox Rxns
- Replies: 1
- Views: 272
List of Steps for Redox Rxns
What's the list of steps that help us balance redox reactions more easily?
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:24 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Hess's Law [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 924
Re: Hess's Law [ENDORSED]
Yeah, seems like we often don't have to memorize a lot of things just for the sake of memorizing them. Instead, we're given pieces and necessary info: the enthalpies and reactions to reach the final reaction and get its enthalpy and that demonstrates our understanding.
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:20 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Cv vs. Cp [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 13
- Views: 11916
Re: Cv vs. Cp [ENDORSED]
We would also be told the conditions of the problem and then we would know which one to use, Cp or Cv, based off of that.
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:18 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Bond Enthalpies
- Replies: 7
- Views: 830
Re: Bond Enthalpies
Stability is an indicator of how strong bonds are because the more stable something is, the more resistant it is to perturbations. So strong bonds should be able to withstand or require more energy in order to break them.
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:15 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: The sign of q
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1194
Re: The sign of q
Yeah, since the equation of q in the system is closed, the sign's position really just depends on whether the reaction is exo or endothermic.
- Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:06 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Heat capacity [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 550
Re: Heat capacity [ENDORSED]
Yeah, I agree with the people above. Memorizing heat capacities or just numbers outright isn't a proper indicator of our understanding of the material or at least I'd hope so.
- Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:31 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Standard Enthalpies of Physical Change
- Replies: 2
- Views: 179
Standard Enthalpies of Physical Change
Will we have to commit any substances' standard enthalpies of physical change to memory? (table 8.3)
- Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:00 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Open/Closed/Isolated
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1178
Open/Closed/Isolated
What type of system would you say a fish tank is? It's "closed" but things still go in and out technically but I'm not too sure.
Help!
Help!
- Sun Dec 10, 2017 9:05 pm
- Forum: Amphoteric Compounds
- Topic: Finals Question about Glycine? [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 726
Finals Question about Glycine? [ENDORSED]
I think it asked if Glycine or an amino acid like it was amphiphoteric. What was it?
- Sun Dec 10, 2017 9:04 pm
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Finals Question about Empirical Formula [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 605
Finals Question about Empirical Formula [ENDORSED]
For the question, it gave us grams of CO2 and grams of H2O produced and, from that, find the empirical formula of the CHO compound. Just to clarify, did ya'll find grams of C through CO2 and then H from H2O and then find grams of O from the total CHO compound?
- Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:39 pm
- Forum: Sigma & Pi Bonds
- Topic: Difference between Bonds [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1202
Difference between Bonds [ENDORSED]
For clarification, there has to be a sigma bond before a pi bond, and there only has to be 1 sigma bond for something like a triple bond, correct? In a triple bond, there is a sigma bond and 2 pi bonds?
- Sun Dec 03, 2017 11:35 pm
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: Expanded Octet Rules
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1107
Expanded Octet Rules
At what point in the periodic table do expanded octets become a possibility and why?
- Sun Nov 26, 2017 3:24 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: 17.33
- Replies: 4
- Views: 987
17.33
Which of the following ligands can be polydentate? If the ligand can be polydentate, give the maximum number of places on the ligand that can bind simultaneously to a single metal center: (a) HN(CH2CH2NH2)2; (b) CO3 2-; (c) H2O; (d) oxalate.
- Sun Nov 26, 2017 3:11 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Reactions and their Reverse Reactions
- Replies: 1
- Views: 214
Reactions and their Reverse Reactions
Can someone explain to me again how the relationship between equilibrium of a reaction and its reverse reaction is inverse?
- Sun Nov 19, 2017 5:52 pm
- Forum: Coordinate Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Naming Conventions [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 616
Naming Conventions [ENDORSED]
What are the naming conventions for complexes and coordination compounds and what are some good ways to remember them?
- Sun Nov 19, 2017 5:20 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Lone Pairs
- Replies: 4
- Views: 498
Lone Pairs
How come lone pairs of electrons change bond angles, and do opposite lone pairs of electrons offset each other?
- Sun Nov 12, 2017 9:41 pm
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: Expanded Octet
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2378
Re: Expanded Octet
I also recall reading somewhere that starting after Phosphorus, since it and the elements in its family/family to the right are large atoms, it is possible for them to have expanded octets as well.
- Sun Nov 12, 2017 9:40 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Atomic Structure of HOCO
- Replies: 2
- Views: 407
Atomic Structure of HOCO
What was the structure of HOCO for the midterm and was it a radical?
- Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:55 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Post-Module #18 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 612
Re: Heisenberg Post-Module #18 [ENDORSED]
I agree, knowing the radius to an accuracy of 1% means that the uncertainty in position is a hundredth of what the radius is, which is multiplying the radius by 0.01 or dividing by 100. Then, you can use that as delta x in the heisenberg equation and finish
- Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:29 am
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: 3.77 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 207
Re: 3.77 [ENDORSED]
HCL has higher ionic character because CL has higher electron affinity than I and will consequently take H's electron in a way that gives it greater ionic character
- Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:15 pm
- Forum: DeBroglie Equation
- Topic: Test 2, Question #7 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 788
Re: Test 2, Question #7 [ENDORSED]
Yup, I did the same thing as ^^ and I think it's because 1/2mv^2 describes best the energy of the moving electron while DeBroglie's equation also uses velocity but it's moreso for waves/light
- Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:07 pm
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: Orbital Shapes [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 293
Orbital Shapes [ENDORSED]
What are the shapes of the orbitals and why is that important and do you think we will need to know that for assessments?
- Mon Oct 23, 2017 3:55 pm
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: d5 and d10 e- exception
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2017
d5 and d10 e- exception
In lecture, we went over the first row of transition metals and at Chromium and Copper, there's the d5 and d10 exception. Do those exceptions work exactly the same for the elements in Chromium and Copper's respective groups as well?
- Sun Oct 22, 2017 6:31 pm
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: Quantum Numbers [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 249
Quantum Numbers [ENDORSED]
For the magnetic quantum #, (ml), how do I know which number to use?
- Mon Oct 16, 2017 12:29 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Electromagnetic Spectrum for Test
- Replies: 2
- Views: 366
Re: Electromagnetic Spectrum for Test
Yeah, I agree. In lecture, Lavelle said he'd be providing constants and things that would be necessary just like how a periodic table was necessary for the first test and one was provided to us.
- Mon Oct 16, 2017 12:26 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Chapter 1: Question 1.9 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1705
Re: Chapter 1: Question 1.9 [ENDORSED]
Yup ^^ and because of that, you can also technically look at wavelengths with longer wavelengths having lower radiation and shorter wavelengths with higher radiation
- Sun Oct 08, 2017 5:01 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Significant figures Clarification [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 751
Re: Significant figures Clarification [ENDORSED]
I think it would be safer to keep a lot of sig figs (more than 3 in your example) and then at the end, round it to 3 sig figs so that the calculations will be as accurate as possible. Sometimes it might not make a difference but it is more accurate.
- Sun Oct 08, 2017 4:56 pm
- Forum: Limiting Reactant Calculations
- Topic: M11 Part A
- Replies: 1
- Views: 221
M11 Part A
For part A of M11, am I supposed to use the amount of oxygen leftover from the first reaction in the second reaction or am I supposed to use the starting mass of oxygen for the second reaction to see if O2 is a limiting reactant?
- Sun Oct 08, 2017 4:51 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: Problem E7
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1359
Problem E7
A molecule of human DNA was found to contain 2.1 x 10^9 atoms of carbon. Calculate the chemical amount (in moles) of carbon atoms in the molecule of DNA.
I know there's a relationship between number of atoms in a mole with Avogadro's number but I'm not sure how to use it exactly.
I know there's a relationship between number of atoms in a mole with Avogadro's number but I'm not sure how to use it exactly.