Search found 30 matches
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 8:20 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Test 3 Question 2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 792
Re: Test 3 Question 2
Oh, I see. Thank you guys for your help!
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 8:17 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Test 3 Question 2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 792
Re: Test 3 Question 2
This is what I did.
- Tue Jun 05, 2018 8:07 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Test 3 Question 2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 792
Test 3 Question 2
Hi, for question 2 I had to find the most stable lewis structure for TiCl4. I thought I had did it right because of the formal charges but it was wrong. Could someone please explain the answer?
Thanks
Thanks
- Thu May 31, 2018 8:04 pm
- Forum: Dipole Moments
- Topic: 4.25d - Lone Pairs
- Replies: 2
- Views: 481
Re: 4.25d - Lone Pairs
That is correct. When looking at dipole moments you need to consider the shape with regard to the effect lone pairs have on it. The lone pairs push atoms closer together and thus not all dipole moments will cancel out depending on the structure.
- Thu May 31, 2018 4:03 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: homework 4.29
- Replies: 1
- Views: 324
Re: homework 4.29
A smaller bond angle means that it has less of a chance of canceling each other out. When the bond angles are really small they go in practically the same direction meaning that the cancellation between the two is really small compared to larger bond angles where they could partially cancel each oth...
- Thu May 31, 2018 3:58 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: 4.5 Confusion
- Replies: 5
- Views: 778
Re: 4.5 Confusion
When you draw out the lewis structure, there are 2 single bonds between the Cl and the O atoms. O-Cl-O. There is also a lone pair of electrons around the Cl atom. This makes 3 regions of electron density meaning that the shape is trigonal pyramidal based on the arrangement of electrons. When conside...
- Sat May 26, 2018 8:33 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Shapes with different types of bonds
- Replies: 3
- Views: 422
Re: Shapes with different types of bonds
Bond angles will change because double and triple bonds have higher electron concentrations compared to single bonds which leads to electron repulsion, thus affecting the angles.
- Tue May 22, 2018 9:26 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Help on 3.11
- Replies: 1
- Views: 283
Re: Help on 3.11
For this question I started out by finding the element the given configuration led to. From there since it is a 3+ ion, that meant that 3 electrons were subtracted from the configuration so I added them back which meant first adding back the 2 in the s-orbital and then one in the d-orbital giving th...
- Tue May 22, 2018 9:20 am
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: 3.71
- Replies: 1
- Views: 365
Re: 3.71
That is correct. A structure with a lower formal charge is more likely to contribute to a resonance structure.
- Sat May 19, 2018 12:29 pm
- Forum: Quantum Numbers and The H-Atom
- Topic: Midterm Question
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1429
Re: Midterm Question
This question from the midterm was number 2.27 from the homework.
- Thu May 17, 2018 12:01 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: how many place numbers to round to
- Replies: 3
- Views: 533
Re: how many place numbers to round to
Generally you would look at the information provided in the question. For the values given that you will use, whichever one has the lowest number of sig figs is the number of sig figs your answer should have.
- Wed May 16, 2018 9:38 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: 3.23a & b
- Replies: 2
- Views: 373
Re: 3.23a & b
Basically the maximum positive and negative oxidation number is the maximum number of electrons the element has to gain or lose to reach the next noble gas. Positive = electrons lost. Negative = electrons gained.
- Fri May 11, 2018 2:40 pm
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Formal Charge: Lewis dot structures
- Replies: 6
- Views: 989
Re: Formal Charge: Lewis dot structures
Most likely yes because finding the formal charge helps to draw the most stable Lewis structure of the molecule.
- Wed May 09, 2018 8:22 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: 2.45
- Replies: 1
- Views: 350
Re: 2.45
I don't fully know why that is but if it is any help, on the list of problems to do it said to omit part d from 45. We probably won't have a question like that on the midterm.
- Mon May 07, 2018 9:48 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: spd orbitals and electron config.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 480
Re: spd orbitals and electron config.
If the electron configuration is equal to a noble gas then you should use the one in the row above it and then write out the rest of the electron configuration. I think Dr. Lavelle would prefer this instead of just writing [Ar] because it shows that you understand how to write an electron configurat...
- Thu May 03, 2018 11:35 pm
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Electron Configurations and Unpaired e- [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 520
Re: Electron Configurations and Unpaired e- [ENDORSED]
There would be 2 unpaired electrons because the p-orbital can hold 6 electrons total. You would first begin by putting the 3 electrons as unpaired but then there is still 1 electron left which you would place with one of the first 3 single electrons. Thus there would be 1 pair and 2 unpaired electro...
- Wed May 02, 2018 8:57 pm
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: homework 2.59
- Replies: 3
- Views: 355
Re: homework 2.59
Atomic radii decrease across a period and since P3- appears first it has the greatest atomic radii and S2- and Cl- appear after it respectively on the periodic table meaning that their atomic radii are less than it. Therefore, since it asks for increasing atomic order it would be Cl- < S2- < P3- I d...
- Mon Apr 30, 2018 6:10 pm
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: cation or anion?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 592
Re: cation or anion?
They should provide you with that information by giving you the element such as K+ or N^2- An element with a + is a cation (and thus you take away electrons) and an element with a - is an anion (so you add electrons). So two elements when in the ion form could have the same electron configuration bu...
- Sat Apr 28, 2018 7:49 pm
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: Electron Spin [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 456
Re: Electron Spin [ENDORSED]
ms=+1/2 just means that the electron is spinning up whereas ms=-1/2 means that the electron is spinning down
- Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:20 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Test 2 #7 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 484
Test 2 #7 [ENDORSED]
Could someone explain how to do #7 from test 2
Thanks
Thanks
- Mon Apr 23, 2018 11:34 am
- Forum: DeBroglie Equation
- Topic: DeBroglie
- Replies: 5
- Views: 752
Re: DeBroglie
DeBroglie's equation calculates the wavelength of any particle with wavelike properties and that have mass
lambda=Plack's constant(h)/(mass*velocity)
lambda=Plack's constant(h)/(mass*velocity)
- Wed Apr 18, 2018 7:47 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Homework 1.15
- Replies: 3
- Views: 566
Re: Homework 1.15
The formula is explained a little more in section 1.3 Atomic Spectra in the book.
R in the equation is Rydberg's constant and the n's are the lines (different quantum levels) on the spectrum you start at subtracted from the one you go to.
Hope this helps
R in the equation is Rydberg's constant and the n's are the lines (different quantum levels) on the spectrum you start at subtracted from the one you go to.
Hope this helps
- Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:32 am
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Zeros in Sig Figs
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1312
Re: Zeros in Sig Figs
0.09 would have 1 sig fig because the zeros come before the 9.
0.0900 would have 3 sig figs because there are 2 trailing zeros after the 9. the two zeros before the 9 are not counted as sig figs.
0.0900 would have 3 sig figs because there are 2 trailing zeros after the 9. the two zeros before the 9 are not counted as sig figs.
- Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:30 am
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: how many sig figs in number [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 437
Re: how many sig figs in number [ENDORSED]
It depends on where they fall in relation to numbers that are 1 or greater.
if the number is 0.00031 there are only 2 sig figs
if the number is 300001 then there are 6 sig figs
as far as applying this with scientific notation 0.00031 becomes 3.1x10^-4 and still has 2 sig figs
Hope this helps!
if the number is 0.00031 there are only 2 sig figs
if the number is 300001 then there are 6 sig figs
as far as applying this with scientific notation 0.00031 becomes 3.1x10^-4 and still has 2 sig figs
Hope this helps!
- Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:14 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Equations [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 8
- Views: 739
Re: Equations [ENDORSED]
It usually depends on what information is given in the question that I use to determine what equation to use. Wavelength c=v x and E=hv for energy of light. Use both when it is the ejection of an electron.
- Sat Apr 14, 2018 6:14 pm
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Compound Order
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1579
Re: Compound Order
For our purposes right now I don't think the order matters, but later on in the course it might become something to pay attention to. I usually remember the order with CHNOPS for the elements that are used the most. Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Oxygen, Phosphorus, and Sulfer.
Hope this helps!
Hope this helps!
- Sat Apr 14, 2018 2:14 pm
- Forum: *Black Body Radiation
- Topic: Importance of Black Bodies?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 413
Re: Importance of Black Bodies?
I'm pretty sure we don't actually have to know anything about them for this course. They were only mentioned to show that unlike atoms and molecules, there is something that can absorb or emit 'all' frequencies. It was just used as a comparison.
- Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:58 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Sig fig simple question [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 652
Re: Sig fig simple question [ENDORSED]
If you only want 1 sig fig then you would round up to 1.
You don't have to put a decimal after the 1 because it is one sig fig without it but you can put it if you want to.
Hope this helps
You don't have to put a decimal after the 1 because it is one sig fig without it but you can put it if you want to.
Hope this helps
- Tue Apr 10, 2018 2:32 pm
- Forum: Accuracy, Precision, Mole, Other Definitions
- Topic: rounding [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1006
Re: rounding [ENDORSED]
Rounding for answers depends on the individual problem and its significant figures in the question. If the question has only 1 sig fig than rounding to 3 is fine but it it has 2 sig figs than you should leave it as 2.8
- Mon Apr 09, 2018 5:32 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Frequency vs Cycle
- Replies: 5
- Views: 701
Re: Frequency vs Cycle
Frequency and cycle are the same thing because 1 cycle per second is called a Hertz which is the unit used for frequency.