Search found 31 matches
- Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:48 pm
- Forum: Lewis Acids & Bases
- Topic: HI or HCl: stronger acid
- Replies: 8
- Views: 10645
Re: HI or HCl: stronger acid
is this an exception to the general trend? Because I thought more electronegative atoms formed stronger acids.
- Sun Jun 10, 2018 9:07 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Central atom and octet rule?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3082
Re: Central atom and octet rule?
In response to the question above asking when it's ok to have less than 8 electrons, I think you just have to look at the formal charge and see what makes it the closest to neutral. I'm not completely sure though.
- Sun Jun 10, 2018 8:45 pm
- Forum: Dipole Moments
- Topic: Dipole Moment understanding
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2111
Re: Dipole Moment understanding
I think a dipole moment is when there is an uneven sharing of the charges between the atoms. It relates to the partial negatives and partial positives on the atoms due to electronegativity differences. For example in H20 the Hydrogens have a partial positive and the Oxygen has a partial negative whi...
- Sun Jun 10, 2018 8:39 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Bronsted vs Lewis Acids and Bases
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1357
Re: Bronsted vs Lewis Acids and Bases
Yes, Bronstead Acid is a H+ donor, while a Bronstead base is a H+ acceptor. Lewis Acid acid accepts the electron pair while the Lewis base donates the electron pair. I think the difference is just in the way they define the exchange.
- Sun Jun 03, 2018 11:52 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Hybrid Orbitals
- Replies: 3
- Views: 520
Re: Hybrid Orbitals
does this mean that it could have an s and a pz but not the px or py (like h2)? would the orbitals not go in order?
- Sun Jun 03, 2018 11:47 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: 4 ligands shape?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 758
Re: 4 ligands shape?
I might be wrong, but I thought we didn't have to know how to tell the difference for this class. Based off what I understood from lecture I think we were just supposed to know that both types have four ligands.
- Sun Jun 03, 2018 11:44 pm
- Forum: Lewis Acids & Bases
- Topic: Acids/Bases and Lewis Acids/Bases
- Replies: 2
- Views: 351
Re: Acids/Bases and Lewis Acids/Bases
I think it has to do with different ways scientists classified acids and bases. I think they're just alternate ways to define them based on their properties.
- Sun May 27, 2018 9:00 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Difference between polar covalent and ionic bond?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4759
Re: Difference between polar covalent and ionic bond?
For this you would look at the difference in their electronegativities. If the bond is classified as covalent based on the electronegativity difference, but it has a high difference thats closer to the measure for ionic bonds, it's more likely to be polar covalent. You can tell it's ionic if the dif...
- Sun May 27, 2018 8:54 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Single electron
- Replies: 5
- Views: 525
Re: Single electron
I think with how you're asking why it doesn't just become a cation, it's because a radical is still a neutral atom (it has no charge since the protons=neutrons). So if it gained or lost an electron, it would become an ion. So it needs the presence of another (or multiple) atoms to pair it's single e...
- Sun May 27, 2018 8:46 pm
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: expanded octets
- Replies: 5
- Views: 745
Re: expanded octets
I'm not completely sure, but I think with the expanded octet it can hold up to as many electrons as the largest orbital of that element. For example, if it had a 3d subshell, since it has a d orbital it should be able to hold up to 10 electrons in the expanded octet.
- Thu May 17, 2018 10:51 pm
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Formula Provided
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1015
Re: Formula Provided
In response to the question right above this one, the formal charge also lets you know which structure would be correct since there as sometimes multiple ways you could draw the structure. Since the correct structure is the one thats the most stable (or with the formal charge they give you in that i...
- Thu May 17, 2018 10:26 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Configurations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 561
Re: Configurations
Just like was said above, you remove the outermost electrons because they are furthest from the nucleus and therefore they have the least amount of pull. Since it's the furthest out, it's the most loosely bound. That would make them the easiest to remove.
- Thu May 17, 2018 8:34 am
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: How to tell which elements will be most likely to form a covalent bond
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3335
Re: How to tell which elements will be most likely to form a covalent bond
I think when you're trying to determine whether a bond is ionic or covalent, you look at the electronegativity difference between the 2 atoms. If the difference is greater than 2 its ionic and if its less than 1.5 its covalent. You would find the electronegativity values on a chart in the book. I ho...
- Sun May 13, 2018 9:13 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Radicals
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1507
Re: Radicals
the concept of a radical is that it is any atom that has an unpaired valence electron, but I'm not sure how we use them.
- Wed May 09, 2018 11:59 am
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Zeff HW 2.37
- Replies: 2
- Views: 407
Re: Zeff HW 2.37
For electrons in the s orbital, they're less shielded than electrons in the p-orbital and therefore the s orbital would have a higher Zeff value. Since Zeff is the positive charge the electron experiences, the less shielding and closer they are to the nucleus, the higher their zeff will be. So, I th...
- Tue May 08, 2018 4:25 pm
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Increasing Ionic radius
- Replies: 2
- Views: 440
Re: Increasing Ionic radius
Since all of these ions have the same configuration which would be the configuration of Ar (they're isoelectronic), you would order them based on the number of protons they have. Since p has the fewest number of protons, it would pull the electrons the least and therefore have the largest ionic radi...
- Wed May 02, 2018 10:36 pm
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Homework 2.43 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 647
Re: Homework 2.43 [ENDORSED]
I think for Ag, its because a fully filled or half filled d orbital is more stable, so it will try to be at either 5 or 10 electrons if possible. However, I'm not completely sure if it would then fill the 4d before the 5s or if it fills in the normal order but then transfers the electron to the 4d o...
- Wed May 02, 2018 10:15 pm
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Homework 2.43
- Replies: 2
- Views: 352
Re: Homework 2.43
I think like the person who posted before me that the reason Tungsten isn't the same as Chromium is because Chromium is one of the two exceptions mentioned in lecture. So Tungsten should be following the normal pattern since Chromium is the one that is unusual.
- Wed May 02, 2018 10:12 pm
- Forum: Quantum Numbers and The H-Atom
- Topic: 2.17 homework problem
- Replies: 2
- Views: 336
Re: 2.17 homework problem
I believe for this part it's because they give you the angular momentum quantum # (l). Since they told you l=2, like you said you know it would be the d subshell. Because they told you l=2 you're only looking at that particular subshell not including the s or p.
- Tue May 01, 2018 12:50 am
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Homework 2.43 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 647
Re: Homework 2.43 [ENDORSED]
I might be wrong, but if I understand this correctly, the f block shown on the periodic table is inserted in the d block following Ba. Since Tungsten occurs after this block of elements, the f configuration would have to be considered.
- Tue May 01, 2018 12:44 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: 1.55 part c
- Replies: 1
- Views: 277
Re: 1.55 part c
Since the energy we found in part b was Joules per molecule, you would multiply it by avogadro's number (which gives the number of molecules in a mol) in order to convert the energy to the number of joules per mol.
- Tue May 01, 2018 12:41 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: 1.55 part b
- Replies: 2
- Views: 327
Re: 1.55 part b
I might be wrong but I think the equation used for this problem was just E=hv. In part a you would find the frequency based on the given wavelength, and in part b, you would use the frequency you found in part a and just plug it into the equation E=hv.
- Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:16 pm
- Forum: Bohr Frequency Condition, H-Atom , Atomic Spectroscopy
- Topic: Problem 1.15 Textbook
- Replies: 6
- Views: 717
Re: Problem 1.15 Textbook
for reference the problem says: in the uv spectrum of atomic hydrogen, a line is observed at 102.6nm. Determine the values of n for the initial and final energy levels of the electron during the emission of energy that leads to this spectral line. I understand how you find n=3 as being one of the en...
- Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:59 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: eV to Joules [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 374
Re: eV to Joules [ENDORSED]
You would use the constant given where 1 ev= 1.602x10^-19 J
- Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:45 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Homework Problem #33
- Replies: 4
- Views: 404
Re: Homework Problem #33
I think for that part you have to use the equation "Ephoton = Ek + work function" based on the correct answer. But I'm also a little confused about this equation and when to use it in general.
- Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:13 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Wavelength and frequency proportions [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 686
Re: Wavelength and frequency proportions [ENDORSED]
The equation is c=hv (speed=wavelength x frequency). Since c (speed) is a constant if wavelength decreased, frequency would have to increase in order for the constant c to remain the same (3.00 x 10^8). Essentially, the wavelength and frequency have to equal the constant c when they're multiplied to...
- Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:08 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: conversion from Fahrenheit to kelvin
- Replies: 3
- Views: 469
Re: conversion from Fahrenheit to kelvin
I think you have to go through celsius first, but you can do it all in one step. So you could do (F-32)x (5/9) +273.15 to convert to Kelvin.
- Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:02 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: chemical formula [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 963
Re: chemical formula [ENDORSED]
For the molecular and empirical formulas, if you only had the molecular structure (i think you're talking about the 3d pictures with different colors representing different atoms), you could count the number of each type of atom represented and use that to directly write the molecular formula (one c...
- Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:46 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: Quiz 1
- Replies: 6
- Views: 715
Re: Quiz 1
The empirical formula would be the smallest ratio of the elements. For example if the molecular formula was C4H10, the empirical formula would be C2H5 (divided by a ratio of 2). Whereas the molecular formula tells you how many atoms are in that compound.
- Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:40 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: chemical formula [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 963
Re: chemical formula [ENDORSED]
I believe the 2 in 2Na is acting as a coefficient, so you would have 2 mols of Na whereas Na2 would change the structure of the atom. Na2 would be 2 Na bonded together while 2Na is still an unbound Na but in with a stochiometric coefficient so the ratios allow the chemical reaction to be balanced.
- Sun Apr 15, 2018 9:20 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: HW chapter 1 question 3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 590
Re: HW chapter 1 question 3
Also since we know E=hv, since h is a constant if v(the frequency) decreases then E would decrease so D) is not correct. Going off the other equations we know we can also see that answers A) and B) don't represent the correct relationships between the terms. For A) the speed would not decrease becau...