Search found 70 matches
- Wed Mar 13, 2019 4:34 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Test 2 #6 Ordering Reducing/Oxidizing Power
- Replies: 3
- Views: 544
Re: Test 2 #6 Ordering Reducing/Oxidizing Power
Strongest reducing power: most negative value Strongest oxidation power: most positive value For C, find the most negative value (reducing power) as your anode because you'll be subtracting it in the formula [E°(cell) = E°(cathode) − E°(anode)] and the most positive value (oxidation power) as your c...
- Wed Mar 13, 2019 4:20 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Test 2 Cell Diagram
- Replies: 3
- Views: 493
Re: Test 2 Cell Diagram
Also, if there is a solid in the reaction, make sure it is conducting (metal). If not, we then add Pt(s).
- Wed Mar 13, 2019 4:18 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Platinum in Cell Diagram
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1905
Re: Platinum in Cell Diagram
We add Pt(s) if the reaction has no conducting (metal) solid.
- Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:58 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Test 2: Melting Ice
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1087
Re: Test 2: Melting Ice
Melting of ice is a spontaneous reaction, it releases heat. Therefore, it has a negative deltaG.
You can also think about it another way. Liquid water has more entropy than solid ice. Thus, it can imply that deltaG is more (-).
You can also think about it another way. Liquid water has more entropy than solid ice. Thus, it can imply that deltaG is more (-).
- Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:49 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Water in a cell diagram
- Replies: 5
- Views: 587
Re: Water in a cell diagram
My TA said that you don't include water in the cell diagram because with a galvanic cell, it is implied there's already water.
- Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:43 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Reducing power?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 639
Re: Reducing power?
Just remember that:
Strongest reducing power: most negative value
Strongest oxidation power: most positive value
Strongest reducing power: most negative value
Strongest oxidation power: most positive value
- Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:52 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Pt(s)
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1068
Re: Pt(s)
Also, even if the equation gives you a solid, make sure it's a metal. If not, then you have to use Pt(s).
- Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:48 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Cell diagrams and solids
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1016
Re: Cell diagrams and solids
You would want a metal solid to be the electrode. Pt(s) is inert so it's the usual go-to.
- Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:43 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Strength of reducing agent
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1954
Re: Strength of reducing agent
Also, remember that the reducing agent is associated with the oxidation reaction.
- Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:39 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Galvanic Cell Diagram
- Replies: 3
- Views: 427
Re: Galvanic Cell Diagram
Also, the cell diagram itself might be given and we're asked to provide the half-reactions, similarly to problem 14.11 in the 6th Ed. So, you should also know how to work backwards regarding cell diagrams.
- Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:36 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Galvanic Cell Diagram
- Replies: 6
- Views: 583
Re: Galvanic Cell Diagram
Also, Lavelle might give us the cell diagram and ask for the half-reactions, similarly to problem 14.11 in the 6th edition.
- Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:26 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Closed vs Isolated
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1192
Re: Closed vs Isolated
This conversation thread provides more info:
viewtopic.php?f=127&t=41698
viewtopic.php?f=127&t=41698
- Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:59 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Definitions (isochoric/isometric, isothermal, isobaric)
- Topic: 6th edition 8.25
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3256
Re: 6th edition 8.25
I believe it is because the reaction is explicitly stated to release energy so -q(reaction)=-[-q(calorimeter)].
It would then be -q(reaction)=q(calorimeter).
It would then be -q(reaction)=q(calorimeter).
- Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:49 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Example 8.3 sixth edition
- Replies: 3
- Views: 416
Re: Example 8.3 sixth edition
In the problem, it doesn't matter whether you convert it or not because you're simply finding the difference (whether you add 273 or not, the difference between the two temperatures would still be 80).
- Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:39 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: joules conversion factor
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1064
Re: joules conversion factor
It's listed on the formula sheet; just remember to convert the units to joules in the end.
- Sun Feb 10, 2019 2:24 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: 6th Edition Problem 8.21
- Replies: 8
- Views: 864
Re: 6th Edition Problem 8.21
Kobe_Wright wrote:What would cp be in this equation?
If the substance is anything except water, the Cp is usually given in the question.
- Sun Feb 10, 2019 2:10 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Enthalpy values
- Replies: 3
- Views: 518
Re: Enthalpy values
They'll be given! Here's the list of equations/values:
https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... ations.pdf
https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... ations.pdf
- Sun Feb 10, 2019 2:08 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Decreasing volume and chemical equilibrium
- Replies: 8
- Views: 930
Re: Decreasing volume and chemical equilibrium
If you're decreasing the overall volume, the pressure will increase, shifting the reaction where there's less moles of gas.
- Sun Feb 03, 2019 3:35 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Drawing a heating curve
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1119
Re: Drawing a heating curve
I believe the "steepness" can also depend on the intervals of your x and y axis.
- Sun Feb 03, 2019 3:21 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Reversible reaction
- Replies: 3
- Views: 404
Re: Reversible reaction
Here are the formulas:
"Fixed" or irreversible reactions has a constant external pressure: w=-P*deltaV
Reversible and isothermal reactions that has a changing pressure: w=-nRTln(V2/V1)
"Fixed" or irreversible reactions has a constant external pressure: w=-P*deltaV
Reversible and isothermal reactions that has a changing pressure: w=-nRTln(V2/V1)
- Sun Feb 03, 2019 3:17 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Week 4 HW
- Replies: 2
- Views: 428
Re: Week 4 HW
Here's the syllabus for the whole list:
https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... 4BSYLL.pdf
https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... 4BSYLL.pdf
- Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:56 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Hess' Law Confirmation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 357
Re: Hess' Law Confirmation
You would cancel the reactants and products if they're on opposite sides of the equation. Make sure to remember that it should be in the same state. You might have to multiply or reverse the reaction in order to cancel some reactants/products. If you multiply, you should also do the same to the enth...
- Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:48 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Hess's Law
- Replies: 5
- Views: 461
Re: Hess's Law
Remember to also make sure that the states are the same if you're cancelling.
- Sat Jan 26, 2019 7:42 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: method 1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 429
Re: method 1
Also, remember that they have to be the same state.
- Thu Jan 17, 2019 7:07 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Review of Weak Bases
- Replies: 2
- Views: 278
Re: Review of Weak Bases
Apart from other guidelines, a strong base usually has (OH) in the molecular formula, such as LiOH and KOH.
- Tue Jan 15, 2019 11:53 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: 11.33 6th edition
- Replies: 2
- Views: 249
Re: 11.33 6th edition
Similar to finding the equilibrium constant, the reaction quotient requires you to use molarity/concentration.
- Tue Jan 15, 2019 11:49 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: 11.69 (6th Edition)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 258
11.69 (6th Edition)
Equation: CO(g) + H2O(g) ⇌ CO2(g) + H2(g) Question: (d) If the concentration of H2O is decreased, what happens to the equilibrium constant for the reaction? Answer: (d) The equilibrium constant for the reaction is unchanged because it is unaffected by any change in concentration. Can someone please ...
- Thu Jan 10, 2019 7:57 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: 11.11 (6th Edition)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 111
11.11 (6th Edition)
Can someone please explain the concepts behind 11.11c and 11.11d? I know that the coefficients are implied in part d, but I'm uncertain about the impact of it being included/omitted in the ratio and how it affects the overall value. Thanks!
- Thu Jan 10, 2019 7:54 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Reaction quotient [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 440
Re: Reaction quotient [ENDORSED]
If you're pertaining to 11.13a (6th Edition), you use the reactants. The products, since they're solids, are simply 1 in the equation.
- Thu Jan 10, 2019 7:49 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: K vs Q [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 786
Re: K vs Q [ENDORSED]
The formula is the same. What's different between the two is the concept behind it. The equilibrium constant K is the ratio at equilibrium; it describes a reaction that is at equilibrium. On the other hand, the reaction quotient pertains to the ratio at any given time of the reaction. This might elu...
- Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:17 am
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Boiling point
- Replies: 5
- Views: 857
Re: Boiling point
To sum up the previous comments, the stronger the bond, the higher the boiling point.
- Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:08 am
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Bases
- Replies: 4
- Views: 434
Re: Bases
Strong bases usually have [OH-] in the compound.
- Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:07 am
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Boiling point
- Replies: 3
- Views: 889
Re: Boiling point
Adding to the previous comment, there are more bonds present, thus, there are more bonds to break.
- Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:05 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: strong vs weak acids
- Replies: 5
- Views: 640
Re: strong vs weak acids
Strong bases usually have (OH-) in the compound.
- Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:04 am
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: H20
- Replies: 2
- Views: 328
Re: H20
H20 is neutral because if you draw its Lewis Structure, you can see that there is no formal charge on either the oxygen or the hydrogen.
- Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:03 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Naming (churro)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 343
Re: Naming (churro)
Chlorine is named Chloro because it is inside the bracket; it is a ligand.
- Fri Nov 30, 2018 1:52 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Lewis Structures for Molecules with H- AND O- atoms
- Replies: 3
- Views: 462
Re: Lewis Structures for Molecules with H- AND O- atoms
If you see OH in a compound, H is usually attached to O.
- Fri Nov 30, 2018 1:48 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Polar and Nonpolar
- Replies: 3
- Views: 306
Re: Polar and Nonpolar
Knowing an atom's electronegativity will tell you the polarity of the molecule/compound (you will need to know the trend for this). There are exceptions though, because if there's symmetry in the molecular shape, the dipoles can "cancel" each other out. For example, for CCl4, Chlorine is m...
- Fri Nov 30, 2018 1:43 pm
- Forum: Dipole Moments
- Topic: Lone pairs when determining hybridization
- Replies: 3
- Views: 334
Re: Lone pairs when determining hybridization
You regard the pairs separately. This is used in determining the electron geometry, which then helps you acquire the hybridization of X.
- Fri Nov 30, 2018 1:34 pm
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: French Toast 28
- Replies: 3
- Views: 580
Re: French Toast 28
In addition, Fluorine is more electronegative than Iodine; it holds on tightly to its electrons, which makes the bond shorter, and therefore stronger.
- Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:46 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: sigma vs. pi bonds
- Replies: 4
- Views: 412
Re: sigma vs. pi bonds
Bonds-
Single: 1 sigma, 0 pi
Double: 1 sigma, 1 pi
Triple: 1 sigma, 2 pi
A sigma bond must be present if a pi bond were to exist.
Single: 1 sigma, 0 pi
Double: 1 sigma, 1 pi
Triple: 1 sigma, 2 pi
A sigma bond must be present if a pi bond were to exist.
- Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:42 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Multiple bonds and electron density
- Replies: 3
- Views: 318
Re: Multiple bonds and electron density
We don't take into account the number of bonds in finding electron density because they're connected to the same atom, thus, they are simply regarded as a single region. Below is a post similar to yours with more explanation: https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/forum/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=37332 Hope th...
- Sun Nov 25, 2018 10:15 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Sigma and Pi Bonding
- Replies: 2
- Views: 116
Re: Sigma and Pi Bonding
Sigma bonds: end-to-end overlap and must form before a pi bond Pi bonds: side-by-side overlap and it cannot exist w/o a sigma bond To further clarify: Bonds- Single: 1 sigma, 0 pi Double: 1 sigma, 1 pi Triple: 1 sigma, 2 pi There are comments in this link that provide more clarification: https://lav...
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:25 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Types of Bonds
- Replies: 4
- Views: 475
Re: Types of Bonds
Sigma bonds: end-to-end overlap and must form before a pi bond
Pi bonds: side-by-side overlap and it cannot exist w/o a sigma bond
To further clarify:
Bonds-
Single: 1 sigma, 0 pi
Double: 1 sigma, 1 pi
Triple: 1 sigma, 2 pi
Pi bonds: side-by-side overlap and it cannot exist w/o a sigma bond
To further clarify:
Bonds-
Single: 1 sigma, 0 pi
Double: 1 sigma, 1 pi
Triple: 1 sigma, 2 pi
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:20 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Octahedral to Square Planar
- Replies: 7
- Views: 970
Re: Octahedral to Square Planar
If one looks at its electron geometry, it is considered to be an octahedral because we take into account the lone pairs of the central atom. However, if we look at its molecular shape, it is square planar because we only consider the bonded pairs of the central atom.
I hope this helps!
I hope this helps!
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:16 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Water Molecule
- Replies: 3
- Views: 370
Re: Water Molecule
It is helpful to know about electron geometry since the two comments above are pertaining to that. Electron Geometry: takes into account the lone pairs of the central atom (thus, it is considered to be a tetrahedral) Molecular Shape: considers bonded pairs only of the central atom (thus, its shape i...
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:09 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Molecular Shape vs. Electron Geometry
- Replies: 4
- Views: 444
Re: Molecular Shape vs. Electron Geometry
amogha_koka3I wrote:So is this an easy way to look at it: electron geometry/arrangement takes into account lone pairs of the central atom whereas molecular shape simply considers the shared bonds?
Yeah, that is the difference between the two.
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:05 pm
- Forum: General Science Questions
- Topic: Thanksgiving Week
- Replies: 8
- Views: 945
Re: Thanksgiving Week
There is no class on Wednesday.
- Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:36 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Q. 4.1B
- Replies: 1
- Views: 232
Q. 4.1B
I just wanted to verify the answer for question 4.1B. Is the reason why a linear molecule "may have lone pairs" is that said molecule can have lone pairs of electrons as long as the ends have the same amount of pairs? Or is it completely dependent on the central atom having a lone pair or ...
- Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:18 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: how to know which shape it is
- Replies: 6
- Views: 695
Re: how to know which shape it is
Hi!
The preceding comments are helpful, but I believe that looking at a VSEPR chart would solidify what they're saying.
This link may provide you with a better idea: https://goo.gl/images/bkB9yu
Hope this helps!
The preceding comments are helpful, but I believe that looking at a VSEPR chart would solidify what they're saying.
This link may provide you with a better idea: https://goo.gl/images/bkB9yu
Hope this helps!
- Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:08 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: trigonal pyramidal
- Replies: 3
- Views: 289
Re: trigonal pyramidal
Trigonal pyramidal is applicable when there's 3 atoms bonded to a central atom that has a lone pair. It is the ideal structure because the angles are <109 degrees.
- Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:58 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Standard Units
- Replies: 8
- Views: 809
Re: Standard Units
Wavelength (lambda): nm or m
Frequency (nu): Hz or s^-1.
Speed of light: m/s
Hope it helps!
Frequency (nu): Hz or s^-1.
Speed of light: m/s
Hope it helps!
- Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:53 am
- Forum: Quantum Numbers and The H-Atom
- Topic: s,p,d,f
- Replies: 8
- Views: 957
Re: s,p,d,f
Also, remember after filling in the electrons in the order of 4s & 3d, you should move 3d before 4s. So, it will be 3d^n, 4s^n in your final electron configuration.
- Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:45 am
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Mass Composition
- Replies: 3
- Views: 398
Re: Mass Composition
The mass composition has to add up to 100% or else you would not be able to do the problem.
- Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:41 am
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Exam
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1187
Re: Exam
To provide more clarification: Addition/Subtraction : The answer should have the "smallest number of decimal places." For example: 10.2 + 1.005 + 2.35 = 13.555 = 13.6. (10.2 has one decimal present, thus, we "follow" it) 4.505 - 2.3 = 2.205 = 2.2 Multiplication/Division : One pic...
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:30 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Lewis Structure Drawing
- Replies: 6
- Views: 529
Re: Lewis Structure Drawing
Try to do what Lavelle teaches us. As of now, he used lines to symbolize bonds not lone electrons; dots signify electrons.
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:25 pm
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: Subshells/Orbitals
- Replies: 5
- Views: 536
Re: Subshells/Orbitals
I think we just have to know the general idea of what the f-orbital entails, not the specifics of it.
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 6:19 pm
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: mass of electron
- Replies: 5
- Views: 468
Re: mass of electron
Yes, it is listed in the equations sheet in the front.
The link below lists all of the given:
https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... ations.pdf
As the previous comment stated, you just have to know when to convert that to another unit.
The link below lists all of the given:
https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... ations.pdf
As the previous comment stated, you just have to know when to convert that to another unit.
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 1:50 pm
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Shortcuts
- Replies: 4
- Views: 494
Re: Shortcuts
Looking for patterns may be the way to go.
Look at how the numbers varies for n, l, ml, and ms.
Look at how the numbers varies for n, l, ml, and ms.
- Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:49 am
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Test 2 Material
- Replies: 9
- Views: 688
Re: Test 2 Material
My TA said that it is all of chapter 1 and the first part of chapter 2; I don't know where the cutoff is for the latter though.
- Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:46 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: 2.37
- Replies: 2
- Views: 107
2.37
I just wanted some clarification regarding question 2.37 part a and b because they're related in some way. Why do they mean by "electrons in the lower energy orbitals will 'shield' the electrons in the higher energy orbitals from the nucleus?" Why do electrons in the lower energy levels do...
- Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:41 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: eV to J
- Replies: 7
- Views: 960
Re: eV to J
Just to verify the preceding comment, my TA said that the conversion will be listed on the test.
- Sun Oct 21, 2018 12:23 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: 2.31
- Replies: 2
- Views: 352
Re: 2.31
For (a), one must remember that subshells are the principal and angular momentum quantum numbers. The symbol for the two would be (n) and (l), with l=n-1. a.) cannot exist because if n=2, values of l can be l=1 or l=0. l=1 is the p-orbital and l=0 is the s-orbital; there is no value of l that can be...
- Sat Oct 20, 2018 10:47 pm
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: HW: 2.13
- Replies: 1
- Views: 92
HW: 2.13
Can someone please explain to me the question: "Describe the orientation of the lobes of the px-, py-, and pz-orbitals with respect to the reference Cartesian axes"
I was wondering how one will depict each of the orbitals, such as the orbitals' specific characteristics if they do have one.
I was wondering how one will depict each of the orbitals, such as the orbitals' specific characteristics if they do have one.
- Tue Oct 09, 2018 3:45 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Sig Fig zero rules
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2359
Re: Sig Fig zero rules
In addition, With values that end in zero but has a decimal point after it, you consider those zeros as Significant Figures. For example, 500. and 4350. has 3 and 4 Significant Figures respectively. Hope that helps! If you do have questions regarding subtraction/addition and multiplication/division ...
- Mon Oct 08, 2018 7:38 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Sig Figs: Addition and Subtraction
- Replies: 3
- Views: 518
Re: Sig Figs: Addition and Subtraction
To provide more clarification: Addition/Subtraction : The answer should have the "smallest number of decimal places." For example: 10.2 + 1.005 + 2.35 = 13.555 = 13.6. (10.2 has one decimal present, thus, we "follow" it) 4.505 - 2.3 = 2.205 = 2.2 *Thus, for answers regarding subt...
- Mon Oct 08, 2018 7:27 pm
- Forum: Limiting Reactant Calculations
- Topic: Theoretical vs Actual Yield
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3071
Re: Theoretical vs Actual Yield
To add on the first reply, if the Percent Yield > 100%, the reason would be is that the product is not pure.
- Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:33 am
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Sig Figs
- Replies: 3
- Views: 283
Re: Sig Figs
To provide more clarification: Addition/Subtraction : The answer should have the "smallest number of decimal places." For example: 10.2 + 1.005 + 2.35 = 13.555 = 13.6. (10.2 has one decimal present, thus, we "follow" it) 4.505 - 2.3 = 2.205 = 2.2 Multiplication/Division : One pic...
- Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:08 am
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Avogadro's Constant Sig Fig?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 235
Re: Avogadro's Constant Sig Fig?
Just reaffirming the reply you got, the Solutions Manual goes by 6.022 x 10^23. Ergo, rounding 6.022 to 6.02 will lead to some of your answers to be off, just as you said.
- Thu Oct 04, 2018 11:59 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Sig Fig's in Problem E.21.d
- Replies: 3
- Views: 451
Re: Sig Fig's in Problem E.21.d
The two precedent posts make sense, however, when one adds or subtracts, the rule for significant figures differs from the multiplication/division. When one is adding or subtracting, they should take the "smallest amount of decimal places in the data" (this can be found in one of the links...