Search found 65 matches
- Sun Mar 17, 2019 12:58 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: cell concentration
- Replies: 2
- Views: 468
Re: cell concentration
Concentration cells have the same element on both sides just with different concentrations so there is not Ecell for standard conditions.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:31 pm
- Forum: Interesting Applications: Rechargeable Batteries (Cell Phones, Notebooks, Cars), Fuel Cells (Space Shuttle), Photovoltaic Cells (Solar Panels), Electrolysis, Rust
- Topic: Corrosion
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1675
Re: Corrosion
The outline says to be familiar with industrial and biological examples so I'd just study it.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:29 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: 4J.5
- Replies: 1
- Views: 403
Re: 4J.5
When they say "of NH3," they mean one NH3.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:28 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Delta N
- Replies: 1
- Views: 346
Re: Delta N
Yes. You are correct.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:28 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: Concentration Cells
- Replies: 2
- Views: 253
Re: Concentration Cells
A higher concentration of cations means electrons are more drawn to that side.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:27 pm
- Forum: Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts
- Topic: 7th edition 7D.1
- Replies: 1
- Views: 228
Re: 7th edition 7D.1
Use the equation for the difference in temperature for Arrhenius equations.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:25 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: Reduction Potential of Water
- Replies: 1
- Views: 284
Re: Reduction Potential of Water
It depends if it is a pH = 7. They give it to you before the questions.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:24 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Cell Diagrams: Solids in different phases
- Replies: 1
- Views: 218
Re: Cell Diagrams: Solids in different phases
They will always be separated because solids can't mix.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:22 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: Nernst Equation and pH
- Replies: 2
- Views: 505
Re: Nernst Equation and pH
You can use Nernst Equation to find Q or K if it is at equilibrium. Then you can solve for [H+] if you are given other concentrations.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:50 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: rules for Delta H
- Replies: 1
- Views: 394
Re: rules for Delta H
DeltaH = q at constant pressure. DeltaH doesn't correlate with w ever.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:35 am
- Forum: Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts
- Topic: Catalyst vs Intermediate
- Replies: 1
- Views: 229
Re: Catalyst vs Intermediate
Indeed. You are correct.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:31 am
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: Steady State?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 201
Re: Steady State?
We don't have to know that. We have to pre-equilibrium only.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:29 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Gibbs Free Energy
- Replies: 2
- Views: 595
Re: Gibbs Free Energy
Gibbs free energy of formation is 0 for elements in their standard states.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:26 am
- Forum: Zero Order Reactions
- Topic: Zero-order reactions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 684
Re: Zero-order reactions
The units of the rate are always the same, mol/(L*s). k has the same units. because concentration doesn't matter. Half life is always in time units.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:23 am
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: Solution Manual Q
- Replies: 1
- Views: 236
Re: Solution Manual Q
No, we do not.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:22 am
- Forum: Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts
- Topic: New Mechanisms
- Replies: 1
- Views: 237
Re: New Mechanisms
I believe it is only a single new mechanism because we are dealing with mechanisms of the whole reactions, not individual subreactions.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:29 am
- Forum: Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts
- Topic: Difference between activation energy and free energy of activation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 313
Re: Difference between activation energy and free energy of activation
You are correct. Well done.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:28 am
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: 6th Edition 15.61
- Replies: 2
- Views: 276
Re: 6th Edition 15.61
You take the difference of two Arrhenius equations. It's in the book.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:28 am
- Forum: Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts
- Topic: 7D.5 Seventh Edition
- Replies: 1
- Views: 250
Re: 7D.5 Seventh Edition
I think the solution manual is wrong. The value you get should be lnK2/K1 = -0.59. And then you solve.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:26 am
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: Linear plots problem 15.99
- Replies: 1
- Views: 236
Re: Linear plots problem 15.99
If it is a straight line on the graph, then it is linear.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:26 am
- Forum: Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts
- Topic: Arrehnius Equation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 297
Re: Arrehnius Equation
That particular equation won't be given. The derivation is just taking the difference of two Arrhenius equations.
- Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:25 am
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: Order of reactions plots
- Replies: 2
- Views: 305
Re: Order of reactions plots
For zero order, its A. For first order, its lnA. For second order, its 1/A
- Sat Mar 09, 2019 3:24 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: 6M. 1 7th Edition
- Replies: 2
- Views: 280
6M. 1 7th Edition
A student was given a standard Cu(s)|Cu2+(aq) half-cell and another half-cell containing an unknown metal M in 1.00 M M(NO3)2 (aq) and formed the cell M(s)|M+||Cu2+(aq)|Cu(s). The cell potential was found to be -0.689 V. What is the value of E(M2+/M)? I don't understand how we're supposed to know wh...
- Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:09 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: overall grade points
- Replies: 2
- Views: 360
Re: overall grade points
It sorta depends on how the rest of the class does. This class isn't curved but the grades are scaled. So, Lavelle will select a grade he thinks a B should be and then base everything around that score.
- Wed Feb 20, 2019 1:07 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Spontaneous vs Not Spontaneous
- Replies: 7
- Views: 736
Re: Spontaneous vs Not Spontaneous
Negative delta G is spontaneous and positive is not spontaneous
- Tue Feb 12, 2019 11:33 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: work
- Replies: 5
- Views: 550
Re: work
It means work is being done on the system.
- Sun Feb 10, 2019 6:46 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Midterm Next Week
- Replies: 6
- Views: 684
Re: Midterm Next Week
The midterm covers till right before Gibbs Free Energy.
- Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:21 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: partial pressures vs. concentrations
- Replies: 3
- Views: 356
Re: partial pressures vs. concentrations
I think it depends on what they are asking for. If they do not specify, just make sure its clear which one you are finding.
- Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:17 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: autoprotolysis
- Replies: 2
- Views: 179
Re: autoprotolysis
Autoprotolysis is when water ionizes itself by donating a proton to another water molecule, but the liquid water remains neutral. This helps us derive the equation [H3O+][OH-] = Kw which is helpful in acid base calculations.
- Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:58 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Finding temperature
- Replies: 2
- Views: 326
Re: Finding temperature
I don't think you need to convert to concentrations because the answers seem to be in bars. You can just carry out the calculations in terms of pressure and Kp.
- Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:09 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Aqueous solution
- Replies: 2
- Views: 182
Re: Aqueous solution
Aqueous solutions are included in the calculation because compounds dissociate in solution.
- Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:44 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Bases
- Replies: 4
- Views: 427
Bases
How do I know if something is a strong base?
- Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:36 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Polarizing Power for Na+, Mg2+, Li+, Be2+
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4359
Re: Polarizing Power for Na+, Mg2+, Li+, Be2+
In the books section on ionic radius Li+ is bigger than Mg2+.
- Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:24 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Polarizing Power for Na+, Mg2+, Li+, Be2+
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4359
Re: Polarizing Power for Na+, Mg2+, Li+, Be2+
Yea, but i thought we use ionic radius because these are ions?
- Fri Dec 07, 2018 1:05 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Polarizing Power for Na+, Mg2+, Li+, Be2+
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4359
Polarizing Power for Na+, Mg2+, Li+, Be2+
Why is the polarizing power from least to greatest Na+, Mg2+, Li+, Be2+? I get why Na+ is the least and Be2+ is the greatest but I do not get why Li+ would be greater than Mg2+. Li+ is larger than Mg2+ according to the diagram of ionic radii in 1F.3 7th Edition and it has a lesser charge, so wouldn'...
- Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:47 pm
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: Ranking strong acids and bases
- Replies: 4
- Views: 759
Re: Ranking strong acids and bases
I think greater polarity in the bond means they are more likely to dissociate.
- Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:46 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Lone pairs & dipoles
- Replies: 1
- Views: 136
Re: Lone pairs & dipoles
They mainly affect the shape since lone pairs do not have polar properties.
- Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:44 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Polydentate Ligands
- Replies: 2
- Views: 264
Re: Polydentate Ligands
I think we need to know C2H8O2.
- Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:43 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Ligand Naming: -ido vs. -o
- Replies: 2
- Views: 293
Re: Ligand Naming: -ido vs. -o
I think either should be fine. I normally use -o because they use that in the answer key more.
- Sun Dec 02, 2018 5:03 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Hybridization
- Replies: 5
- Views: 615
Re: Hybridization
Tetrahedral is indeed always sp3.
- Sun Dec 02, 2018 5:01 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Hybridization
- Replies: 3
- Views: 426
Re: Hybridization
It depends. Different numbers of lone pairs can change the hybridization of the central atom but not change the shape. For example, a linear geometry can have 0 or 3 lone pairs.
- Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:31 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: lone pairs
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2117
Re: lone pairs
Lone pairs count as an area of electron density so they count for hybridization.
- Mon Nov 26, 2018 1:42 am
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Resonance
- Replies: 3
- Views: 431
Re: Resonance
Basically. you have to draw a lewis structure first that fits the molecule. Then, see if it has resonance. It's difficult to just tell off the bat unless you have a lot of practice.
- Mon Nov 26, 2018 1:40 am
- Forum: Interionic and Intermolecular Forces (Ion-Ion, Ion-Dipole, Dipole-Dipole, Dipole-Induced Dipole, Dispersion/Induced Dipole-Induced Dipole/London Forces, Hydrogen Bonding)
- Topic: Polar Bonds
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1723
Re: Polar Bonds
If they are opposite each other or have the same relative force of attraction, then they cancel out.
- Mon Nov 26, 2018 1:38 am
- Forum: Student Social/Study Group
- Topic: 4.21 Part c 6th edition
- Replies: 1
- Views: 255
Re: 4.21 Part c 6th edition
I do not think you have to unless it asks for it or all resonance structures.
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:47 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Square Planar vs Tetrahedral
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2432
Re: Square Planar vs Tetrahedral
Square planar has two lone pairs that cause the 4 atoms surrounding the central atom to form a square. Tetrahedral has no lone pairs .
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:41 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Polar
- Replies: 8
- Views: 975
Re: Polar
Polarity does not affect it, only having the formal charges closest to 0 matters.
- Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:38 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: sp3 hybridization
- Replies: 6
- Views: 495
Re: sp3 hybridization
Yes, I think so, because tetrahedral geometry has 4 areas of electron density.
- Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:18 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Polar
- Replies: 8
- Views: 975
Re: Polar
If the formal charges are close to 0, then you use that one.
- Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:14 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Radical formations
- Replies: 1
- Views: 109
Re: Radical formations
When there is an odd number of valence electrons, it will be a radical formation.
- Sat Nov 03, 2018 8:12 pm
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: Formal charge
- Replies: 7
- Views: 927
Re: Formal charge
Yes, if you want to find the most stable form.
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:00 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Lewis Structures
- Replies: 8
- Views: 692
Re: Lewis Structures
The number of dots is the number of electrons for that element.
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:57 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Resonance Structures
- Replies: 5
- Views: 450
Re: Resonance Structures
Ozone is a good example for resonance. The double bond can be on either side of the central oxygen, so there are two resonance structures.
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:55 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: the Octet rule
- Replies: 21
- Views: 4122
Re: the Octet rule
Most elements try to go for a full octet or a half-filled octet.
- Thu Oct 25, 2018 11:32 am
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Question about 4s and 3d orbitals
- Replies: 1
- Views: 288
Re: Question about 4s and 3d orbitals
The 4s orbital is only less in energy when there are no electrons in 3d. But, once 4s and 3d are filled, 4s is higher in energy, so it is the first to lose electrons.
- Tue Oct 23, 2018 12:46 am
- Forum: Bohr Frequency Condition, H-Atom , Atomic Spectroscopy
- Topic: Question 1.55 6th edition
- Replies: 1
- Views: 108
Re: Question 1.55 6th edition
I think your answer is right. We went over this question in my discussion and we got 1.08*10^10 1/s.
- Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:09 pm
- Forum: *Shrodinger Equation
- Topic: Book Example 1.8:
- Replies: 4
- Views: 464
Re: Book Example 1.8:
I would not think so since nothing like that was covered in class.
- Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:06 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Atomic Spectra
- Replies: 3
- Views: 276
Re: Atomic Spectra
I think the one line represents the particular wavelength of light.
- Sat Oct 20, 2018 5:05 pm
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Topics We Need to Know for the Test [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 527
Re: Topics We Need to Know for the Test [ENDORSED]
We don't need to know electron configuration or periodic trends.
- Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:47 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Black Body Radiation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 348
Re: Black Body Radiation
Don't worry about Black Body Radiation. It's not required knowledge for this class.
- Thu Oct 11, 2018 10:44 pm
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: M19
- Replies: 1
- Views: 246
M19
This question was really hard. I looked at the books method, and it didn't make any sense. I did it a different way by determining the coefficients of the other terms using empirical method. Did anyone else do it this way???
- Wed Oct 10, 2018 6:22 pm
- Forum: Bohr Frequency Condition, H-Atom , Atomic Spectroscopy
- Topic: Spectral line energy
- Replies: 1
- Views: 139
Re: Spectral line energy
I think it's negative because we are viewing the energy relative to the electron. So, the electron is losing energy, thus the change in energy is negative.
- Sun Oct 07, 2018 9:11 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Calculating process
- Replies: 5
- Views: 864
Re: Calculating process
I agree.
- Thu Oct 04, 2018 3:15 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Decimal point
- Replies: 14
- Views: 919
Re: Decimal point
Basically, zeroes before the decimal point with the decimal point behind them and zeroes following the decimal point are significant. The only zeroes that aren't significant are zeroes in a number like 120 where they are no decimal points.
- Sun Sep 30, 2018 5:36 pm
- Forum: Balancing Chemical Reactions
- Topic: Short cuts/methods for balancing equations
- Replies: 15
- Views: 1780
Re: Short cuts/methods for balancing equations
Generally, I start by finding the compounds with single atoms in its formula. So, for example, if I see C6H8O6 on one side and I see CO2 on the other, I'll start by putting a 6 in front of the CO2.