Search found 51 matches
- Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:37 pm
- Forum: Amphoteric Compounds
- Topic: 6A.17
- Replies: 4
- Views: 395
Re: 6A.17
When SO3 dissolves in water, it becomes H2SO4, the sulfate acid. For c and d, if they react with acidic matter, they can act as a base. If they react with basic matter, they can act as an acid.
- Thu Dec 05, 2019 3:30 pm
- Forum: Lewis Acids & Bases
- Topic: 6A.13
- Replies: 5
- Views: 303
Re: 6A.13
Yes, Ag+ + e- -> Ag, it can accept electron to be back to original state,. By definition, it is a Lewis acid.
- Thu Dec 05, 2019 2:46 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Fundamental J1
- Replies: 1
- Views: 143
Fundamental J1
Why is not NH3 both a Bronsted acid and base? I think that it can both gain an H to form NH4+ and lose an H to be NH2-, so it should be amphoteric.
9C 1C
Why is [Co(CN)5(OH2)]2- aquapentacyano cobaltate(Ⅲ) instead of aquapentacyano cobalt(Ⅲ)
9C 1A
Why is [Fe(CN)6] 4- hexacyanoferrate(Ⅱ) instead of hexacyanoiron(Ⅱ)?
- Sun Dec 01, 2019 10:28 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: Weak Acids & Bases
- Replies: 6
- Views: 407
Re: Weak Acids & Bases
Organic acids and bases are usually weak.
- Sun Dec 01, 2019 10:20 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: Bronsted Acid/Base
- Replies: 4
- Views: 282
Re: Bronsted Acid/Base
Bronsted acid: hydrogen donor,
Bronsted base: hydrogen acceptor
Bronsted base: hydrogen acceptor
- Sun Dec 01, 2019 10:13 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: Why HF is a weaker acid than HCl
- Replies: 17
- Views: 16325
Re: Why HF is a weaker acid than HCl
Since Cl has larger radius, which means that the attraction between H and Cl is weaker, so HCl is more easily to lose the proton.
- Sun Dec 01, 2019 10:04 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: Pka vs Ka
- Replies: 10
- Views: 608
Re: Pka vs Ka
pKa = -log[Ka], pKa usually have a range of 0 to 14
- Sun Dec 01, 2019 10:02 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: Do strong acids dissociate completely in water?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 642
Re: Do strong acids dissociate completely in water?
Yes, you can regard strong acids to dissociate completely.
- Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:39 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: 2.57
- Replies: 4
- Views: 417
Re: 2.57
My answer is that for first C: sp3,109.5,4 sigma, 0 pi, for second C: sp, 180, 2 sigma, 2 pi
- Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:35 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: 2.57
- Replies: 2
- Views: 236
Re: 2.57
I did it. My answer is that for first C: sp3,109.5,4 sigma, 0 pi, for second C: sp, 180, 2 sigma, 2 pi
- Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:33 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: lone pairs in hybridization
- Replies: 8
- Views: 544
Re: lone pairs in hybridization
In hybridization theory, lone pairs and bonding pairs are the same.
- Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:32 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Knowing when hybridization occurs
- Replies: 6
- Views: 430
Re: Knowing when hybridization occurs
It always occur if the atom has more than one electron domain.
- Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:30 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Hybridization with lone pairs on central atom
- Replies: 6
- Views: 466
Re: Hybridization with lone pairs on central atom
Yes, it's basically the same rule as the one without lone pairs. 2 electron domains -> sp, 3 -> sp2, 4 -> sp3, 5 -> sp3d, 6 -> sp3d2
- Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:12 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: HW 2.63
- Replies: 2
- Views: 214
Re: HW 2.63
In order to fulfill octet rule, there must be two lone pairs of electron around O (since bonding pairs only account for four electrons), thus O have 4 electron domains and its bonding angle is 109.5 (similar to tetrahedral).
- Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:09 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: format of test
- Replies: 5
- Views: 274
Re: format of test
I think it will be similar to test1.
- Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:08 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Bond Angle
- Replies: 3
- Views: 189
Re: Bond Angle
Linear: 180
Trigonal planar: 120
Tetrahedral: 109.5
Trigonal bipyramidal: trigonal bond angle: 120, axial bond angle: 90 and 180
Octahedral: 90 and 180
Trigonal planar: 120
Tetrahedral: 109.5
Trigonal bipyramidal: trigonal bond angle: 120, axial bond angle: 90 and 180
Octahedral: 90 and 180
- Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:57 pm
- Forum: Polarisability of Anions, The Polarizing Power of Cations
- Topic: 2D. 11
- Replies: 2
- Views: 299
2D. 11
Arrange the anions Cl-, Br-, N 3-, and O 2- in order of increasing polarizability. What's the general rule of polarizability?
- Thu Nov 14, 2019 2:45 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: 2E.11
- Replies: 4
- Views: 799
2E.11
Why is the shape of IF4 - is square planar, instead of octahedral?
- Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:58 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Trend of Electronegativity
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2135
Re: Trend of Electronegativity
Electronegativity is larger when you move close to upper right corner of the periodic table (F is the largest).
- Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:54 am
- Forum: Bond Lengths & Energies
- Topic: speed of electromagnetic radiation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 216
Re: speed of electromagnetic radiation
Speed is constant (3.00*10^8 m/s), and it equals to wavelength*frequency.
- Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:49 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: 2.7 Lewis structure for N5 +
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2560
2.7 Lewis structure for N5 +
How to draw the Lewis structure for N5+? (N is connected in a chain)?
- Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:31 am
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: General principles of octet exception
- Replies: 7
- Views: 342
General principles of octet exception
What is the general principles of when we should conform octet rule and when not?
- Thu Nov 07, 2019 10:16 am
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: 2C.7
- Replies: 2
- Views: 224
2C.7
I don't quite understand how to draw the Lewis structure of ICl2 +, ICl4 -, ICl3, ICl5
- Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:04 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: valence electrons
- Replies: 4
- Views: 366
Re: valence electrons
Valence electrons just refer to the electrons at the outermost shell. It increases down the group.
- Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:00 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: 2A 5
- Replies: 5
- Views: 153
Re: 2A 5
Kristina Rizo 3K wrote:Do you have a question regarding how to figure out the ground-state electron configurations?
Yes, I don't quite understand which electrons to remove.
- Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:44 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Radical
- Replies: 2
- Views: 102
Radical
Why can we say some species with odd number valence electrons are radicals? Is the converse-negative statement also true? (Does species with even pair of electrons necessarily mean that they are not radicals?)
- Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:31 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Lewis structure
- Replies: 3
- Views: 183
Lewis structure
I don't quite get when we draw the Lewis structure, how do we know which atom is in the middle.
- Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:14 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: 2A 5
- Replies: 5
- Views: 153
2A 5
Give the ground-state electron configuration expected for each of the following ions: (a) Cu+ (b) Bi 3+ (c) Ga 3+ (d) Tl 3+
- Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:56 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: 2A 1
- Replies: 5
- Views: 283
2A 1
Give the number of valence electrons (including d electrons) for each of the following elements. (a) Sb (b) Si (c) Mn (d) B.
I wonder why the answer for (a) is 5 but that for (c) is 7.
I wonder why the answer for (a) is 5 but that for (c) is 7.
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:46 am
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Ionic Radii
- Replies: 10
- Views: 463
Re: Ionic Radii
Cations are smaller because it reduces the energy level of valence electron by 1.
Anions are bigger because the repulsion force between electrons pushes electron outward.
Anions are bigger because the repulsion force between electrons pushes electron outward.
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:43 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: Probability of finding an electron at a certain location
- Replies: 4
- Views: 273
Re: Probability of finding an electron at a certain location
I think we are not required to calculate Schrodinger's function, but only need to know s-, p-, d-, f- orbitals (it's one of the conclusions of Schrodinger's function).
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:32 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: example in class
- Replies: 6
- Views: 209
Re: example in class
It doesn't matter which orbit of x,y,z the electron actually is in because it's symmetric. You can define your x axis according to your own wish. It's just a convention to write x before y and z.
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:29 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: Quantum Numbers
- Replies: 7
- Views: 247
Re: Quantum Numbers
The 4 quantum numbers describe a specific electron in a specific atom/ion. For each electron in atom/ion, it has a different quantum number.
- Tue Oct 22, 2019 11:24 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: Are electrons always removed from the 4s orbital before the 3d orbital?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 619
Re: Are electrons always removed from the 4s orbital before the 3d orbital?
Yes, electrons with higher energy level are always removed first, and always in -f -p -d -s order
- Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:09 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Momentum
- Replies: 2
- Views: 135
Re: Momentum
Because for some objects (such as photon), they have no mass, but they have momentum. It will be non-sense to write it into delta x * m * delta v>= h/4pi for those objects.
- Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:03 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: 1B.9
- Replies: 5
- Views: 463
Re: 1B.9
Energy per photon=h*c/lambda=6.63*10^-34*3.00*10^8/(420*10^-9)=4.74*10^-19
Total energy= 32*2=64
# of photons= Total energy/energy per photon=64/(4.74*10^-19)=1.35*10^20
Total energy= 32*2=64
# of photons= Total energy/energy per photon=64/(4.74*10^-19)=1.35*10^20
- Mon Oct 14, 2019 11:01 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Homework Question 1B.9
- Replies: 2
- Views: 155
Re: Homework Question 1B.9
Energy per photon=h*c/lambda=6.63*10^-34*3.00*10^8/(420*10^-9)=4.74*10^-19
Total energy= 32*2=64
# of photons= Total energy/energy per photon=64/(4.74*10^-19)=1.35*10^20
Total energy= 32*2=64
# of photons= Total energy/energy per photon=64/(4.74*10^-19)=1.35*10^20
- Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:53 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Confusion on equations
- Replies: 9
- Views: 378
Re: Confusion on equations
It just depends on what is given in the problem and what does the problem ask you to do. For example, given frequency, you can use lamda=c/v to get wavelength or E=hv to get energy.
- Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:48 pm
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Electrons wavelengths and frequency
- Replies: 2
- Views: 224
Re: Electrons wavelengths and frequency
Yes, electrons have its own wavelength and frequency, just as everything, its wavelength is determined by De Broglie equation. But don't mess it up with energy level. After absorbing energy of a photon, the electron jumps to a higher energy level.
- Thu Oct 10, 2019 12:00 pm
- Forum: Limiting Reactant Calculations
- Topic: Net Ionic Equation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 415
Re: Net Ionic Equation
(Cu)2+ (aq) + 2(OH)- (aq) ==> Cu(OH)2 (s). Because Na+ and NO3- are always ions, they don't participate in the reaction.
- Thu Oct 10, 2019 11:52 am
- Forum: Bohr Frequency Condition, H-Atom , Atomic Spectroscopy
- Topic: Rydberg equation [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 73
- Views: 9131
Re: Rydberg equation [ENDORSED]
Rydberg equation states that the energy of energy levels equals to hR/n^2 (n=1,2,3...), h is planck constant(6.63*10^-34 Js), R is Rydberg constant (3.29*10^15 Hz)
- Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:43 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: 1A 3 Chemical Principle 7th edition
- Replies: 2
- Views: 91
Re: 1A 3 Chemical Principle 7th edition
Thank you!
- Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:31 am
- Forum: Accuracy, Precision, Mole, Other Definitions
- Topic: Test 1 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 107
- Views: 22535
Re: Test 1 [ENDORSED]
Does anyone know what will be tested tomorrow? Any topics on quantum world?
- Thu Oct 10, 2019 10:24 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: 1A 3 Chemical Principle 7th edition
- Replies: 2
- Views: 91
1A 3 Chemical Principle 7th edition
Could anyone explain that why decreasing frequency of light leads to the decreasing extent of change of electromagnetic radiation?
- Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:57 pm
- Forum: Balancing Chemical Reactions
- Topic: H.1 Chemical Principle 7th edition
- Replies: 4
- Views: 222
H.1 Chemical Principle 7th edition
H.1 It appears that balancing the chemical equation Cu + SO2-> CuO + S would be simple if we could just add another O atom to the product side: Cu + SO2 -> CuO + S +O. (a) Why is that balancing procedure not allowed? (b) Balance the equation correctly.
- Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:52 pm
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: E.9 Chemical Principle 7th edition
- Replies: 3
- Views: 199
E.9 Chemical Principle 7th edition
Epsom salts consists of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate. Write its formula. (a) How many atoms of oxygen are in 5.15 g of Epsom salts? (b) How many formula units of the compound are present in 5.15g? (c) How many moles of water molecules are in 5.15g of Epson salts?
- Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:45 pm
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: F.3 Chemical Principle 7th edition
- Replies: 2
- Views: 305
F.3 Chemical Principle 7th edition
(a) Write the formula for nitric acid. (b) Without doing a calculation, estimate which element in nitric acid occurs with the greater mass percentage.
- Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:39 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: E.7 Chemical Principle 7th edition
- Replies: 4
- Views: 294
E.7 Chemical Principle 7th edition
A molecule of human DNA was found to contain 2.1 * 10^9 atoms of carbon. Calculate the chemical amount (in moles ) of carbon atoms in the molecule of DNA.
- Thu Oct 03, 2019 4:31 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: E.1 7th edition
- Replies: 4
- Views: 291
E.1 7th edition
E.1 The field of nanotechnology offers some intriguing possibilities, such as the creation of fibers one atom wide. Suppose you were able to string together 1.00 mol Ag atoms, each of radius 144pm, into one of these fibers by encapsulating them in carbon nanotubes. How long would the fiber extend?