Search found 49 matches
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 6:04 pm
- Forum: Zero Order Reactions
- Topic: slope of zero order reaction
- Replies: 2
- Views: 264
slope of zero order reaction
Why is the slope of a zero order reaction always negative compared to a first or second order reaction which are negative and positive respectively?
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:50 pm
- Forum: Kinetics vs. Thermodynamics Controlling a Reaction
- Topic: thermodynamically stable
- Replies: 6
- Views: 511
Re: thermodynamically stable
For something to be thermodynamically stable, it has to be spontaneous right? Even though it will not react I think for something to be thermodynamically stable, it is non spontaneous since it is unlikely to move to a higher energy on its own, making it stable thermodynamically. On the other hand, ...
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:46 pm
- Forum: Method of Initial Rates (To Determine n and k)
- Topic: 7A.15
- Replies: 5
- Views: 400
Re: 7A.15
Since C is a zero order reaction, you can ignore it when solving for A and B because that portion would just cancel out to 1/1 since they are both to the zeroth power.
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:38 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: collision theory
- Replies: 2
- Views: 232
collision theory
does anyone know if we will be going over collision theory this upcoming week during lecture?
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:32 pm
- Forum: Kinetics vs. Thermodynamics Controlling a Reaction
- Topic: instantaneous rate
- Replies: 16
- Views: 973
Re: instantaneous rate
Since the graph is a curve, taking the average rate will treat the graph as a line instead and not account for the curve which an instantaneous rate does.
- Sun Mar 01, 2020 5:22 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: 6O.1 and 6O.3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 337
6O.1 and 6O.3
For problem 6O.1 we chose the cathode to be the nickel reaction which had a smaller or more negative E and this makes sense because the reaction is electrolyzed which means that a non spontaneous reaction was driven by an outside current allowing for the cathode to have a smaller E than that of the ...
- Sun Mar 01, 2020 4:51 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: electrolysis
- Replies: 6
- Views: 484
electrolysis
when a problem states that a reaction is electrolyzed, can we assume that the reaction is non spontaneous?
- Sun Mar 01, 2020 2:41 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: 6N.17
- Replies: 1
- Views: 185
6N.17
For the maximum work of this reaction, why is the answer shown to be positive? Shouldn't it be negative because the equation for Wmax= -nFE and E needs to be positive in this case in order for the cell to do work? Thanks in advance!
- Fri Feb 28, 2020 12:22 am
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: concentration cells
- Replies: 5
- Views: 383
concentration cells
what determines whether something is a concentration cell or not? for example, in 6N3, how do we determine which reactions are concentration cells? Thanks in advance!
- Tue Feb 25, 2020 10:25 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: When to apply Pt into cell diagrams
- Replies: 9
- Views: 538
When to apply Pt into cell diagrams
How do you know when to apply Pt(S) as the inert conductor in a cell diagram besides the fact that you have elements in the same phase? Thanks in advance!
- Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:14 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: n in the change in free gibbs energy equation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 320
n in the change in free gibbs energy equation
How do you find n? Is it number of moles of products minus reactants? vice versa? or is it just the change in moles which means it is always positive? thanks in advance!
- Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:02 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: 6K.3D balancing problem?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 336
Re: 6K.3D balancing problem?
Can someone explain why we can write Cl2 -> 2 Cl- please?
- Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:00 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Half reactions
- Replies: 17
- Views: 923
Re: Half reactions
A half reaction is balanced, when the charges on both sides of the half reaction are balanced and also when the elements themselves are balanced.
- Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:56 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Reduction?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 688
Re: Reduction?
If you figure out the oxidation numbers of each molecule, the group where the oxidation number decreases is the portion of the redox reaction that is reduced since it is gaining a more negative charge, meaning it is gaining electrons.
- Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:54 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Oxidation?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 702
Re: Oxidation?
If you figure out the oxidation numbers of each molecule, the group where the oxidation number increases is the portion of the redox reaction that is oxidized since it is gaining a more positive charge, meaning it is donating its electrons.
- Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:52 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Determining direction of flow
- Replies: 15
- Views: 810
Re: Determining direction of flow
Because the direction of flow is always from anode (negative charge) to cathode (positive charge) and the anode is always on the left while the cathode is on the right, the direction that the electron flows is always from left to right.
- Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:06 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: spontaneity
- Replies: 39
- Views: 1934
Re: spontaneity
jisulee1C wrote:Gibbs Free Energy. If delta G is negative you know that the forward reaction is spontaneous.
Why is it Gibbs Free Energy vs, using enthalpy or entropy.
- Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:04 pm
- Forum: Van't Hoff Equation
- Topic: concept help
- Replies: 4
- Views: 284
Re: concept help
The Van't Hoff equation allows us to relate the equilibrium constant with temperature and also change in enthalpy and entropy.
- Sun Feb 16, 2020 1:01 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Number of electrons
- Replies: 5
- Views: 268
Re: Number of electrons
Yes that would make sense since in a oxidation reaction, you are losing electrons which would now be written separately in the products side of the equation.
- Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:59 pm
- Forum: Van't Hoff Equation
- Topic: equilibrium and gibbs energy
- Replies: 2
- Views: 143
Re: equilibrium and gibbs energy
At equilibrium, delta G is 0 because the equation for it is deltaG= -RTlnK, and if K is at equilibrium, then K =1 and taking the natural log of 1 would give you zero.
- Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:56 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: class example
- Replies: 2
- Views: 188
class example
Just to clarify, in class Lavelle used the example:
8H+ + MnO4- + 5e- = Mn+2 + 4H2O where he said Mn is reduced from +7 to +2
Mn is initially +7 because O4 is is -8 and in order for the overall molecule to have a negative charge, Mn has to be +7 right? Thanks in advance!
8H+ + MnO4- + 5e- = Mn+2 + 4H2O where he said Mn is reduced from +7 to +2
Mn is initially +7 because O4 is is -8 and in order for the overall molecule to have a negative charge, Mn has to be +7 right? Thanks in advance!
- Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:31 pm
- Forum: Entropy Changes Due to Changes in Volume and Temperature
- Topic: Entropy of Surroundings vs Entropy of Systems
- Replies: 1
- Views: 161
Entropy of Surroundings vs Entropy of Systems
For reversible reactions, the delta s system is always equivalent to negative delta s surroundings which is equal to delta s system. However, for irreversible reactions, is delta s surroundings always equal to 0? Why? Thanks in advance!
- Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:27 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Change in pressure
- Replies: 7
- Views: 516
Re: Change in pressure
Increasing the pressure will shift the reaction to the side with less moles of gas.
- Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:24 pm
- Forum: Calculating Standard Reaction Entropies (e.g. , Using Standard Molar Entropies)
- Topic: 4I.3: Negative Entropy?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 128
Re: 4I.3: Negative Entropy?
The answer is negative because the question is asking for the standard entropy change of the surroundings specifically and not the system so the standard entropy change of the system should be equivalent to the negative standard entropy change using the idea that when a system loses, its surrounding...
- Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:20 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Intensive vs Extensive
- Replies: 7
- Views: 367
Re: Intensive vs Extensive
Entropy is an extensive property because it depends on the quantity of each. For example, if you have a 6 atom molecule and a 3 atom molecule, the 6 atom molecule has a higher entropy since it can occupy more states than the latter. So in this case, since the entropy of the two molecules was depende...
- Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:12 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Definitions (isochoric/isometric, isothermal, isobaric)
- Topic: Reversible vs Irreversible
- Replies: 7
- Views: 453
Re: Reversible vs Irreversible
For a reversible system, the system is isothermal and thus temperature is constant which impacts the formulas utilized since some are used for temperature change and some are used when temperature is constant which is the case of a isothermal, reversible system.
- Sun Feb 09, 2020 1:12 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: 4.19
- Replies: 1
- Views: 151
4.19
Calculate the molar kinetic energy (in joules per mole) of Kr(g) at (a) 55.85 8C and (b) 54.85 8C.
What equation are we supposed to use to start this problem?
What equation are we supposed to use to start this problem?
- Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:40 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: 4.7
- Replies: 1
- Views: 99
4.7
Calculate the work that must be done against the atmo- sphere for the expansion of the gaseous products in the combus- tion of 1.00 mol C6H6(l) at 25 8C and 1.00 bar
Can anyone give me insight on how to start this problem?
Can anyone give me insight on how to start this problem?
- Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:09 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: q vs H
- Replies: 9
- Views: 496
q vs H
When given the term, "heat transfer" is this referring to q or H?
- Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:53 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: 4A.13
- Replies: 3
- Views: 125
Re: 4A.13
The first step is to find the heat capacity that is calibrated by the calorimeter. To do this use the eqaution C=q(calorimeter)/change in T. Essentially you would do C=(3.50kJ)/(7.32K) = 0.478kJ/K. Then you can use this heat capacity to calculate the heat released by the reaction. So set up the equ...
- Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:59 am
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Pressure in Reversible/Irreversible Expansion
- Replies: 3
- Views: 175
Re: Pressure in Reversible/Irreversible Expansion
Can someone explain how the equation for work for a reversible expansion is derived? or be more specific when you say the integral is taken? Thanks!
- Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:54 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Hess's Law
- Replies: 2
- Views: 128
Re: Hess's Law
Hess's law states that the total enthalpy change for a reaction is the sum of all changes regardless of however many steps a reaction has because enthalpy is a state property. It is typically used when you are given two or more reactions along with their corresponding enthalpy changes and asked to c...
- Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:49 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Bond Enthalpies
- Replies: 6
- Views: 402
Re: Bond Enthalpies
Bonds that are formed are negative in enthalpy calculations because energy is released when bonds are formed and the system loses energy.
- Sun Feb 02, 2020 10:47 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: 4A.7
- Replies: 3
- Views: 134
Re: 4A.7
You add the q of the water and the kettle because the water in the kettle is part of the entire system now and in order to raise the kettle to the boiling point of water, the water inside needs to be raised too and thus you add the two q's.
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:25 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Endothermic and Exothermic
- Replies: 13
- Views: 622
Re: Endothermic and Exothermic
If heat is flowing out, the reaction is exothermic, and if heat is being absorbed, the reaction is endothermic. A trick I like to use to remember this is by looking at the first two letters of each word, in "exothermic" heat is "EXiting" and in "endothermic" heat is &qu...
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:22 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Decreasing volume
- Replies: 5
- Views: 200
Re: Decreasing volume
I like to think of it as the system relieving itself of the increase in pressure in order to balance itself out or reach equilibrium again by shifting to the side with less moles of gas.
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:20 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: 4A.1
- Replies: 1
- Views: 120
Re: 4A.1
This calculate change in volume because the negative value means the volume is decreasing and also the height used which should be 20 cm is how much the pump was depressed which is then multiplied to the area of the base. The reason why this is calculating the change in volume is because the pump is...
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:16 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: 4A.3
- Replies: 3
- Views: 106
Re: 4A.3
You would use the equation for work where W (work) = - P (work constant) x change in V. In this case you would need to calculate the change in volume first with the information given and following that, multiply it by 2.00 atm which is the work constant in this case. Your change in V should be negat...
- Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:12 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: bond enthalpy calculations
- Replies: 2
- Views: 66
Re: bond enthalpy calculations
I believe it is used to account for the phase change and bond enthalpy when calculating overall reaction enthalpy.
- Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:28 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Decreasing pressure
- Replies: 4
- Views: 170
Re: Decreasing pressure
Why does the reaction shift to the side with less moles of gas when pressure increases? And why does the reaction shift to the side with more moles of gas when pressure decreases?
- Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:25 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Ka and Kb
- Replies: 3
- Views: 98
Ka and Kb
When do we know when to use Ka and Kb when given a reaction equation?
- Sat Jan 18, 2020 11:22 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: K and Kc
- Replies: 3
- Views: 156
Re: K and Kc
K and Kc are the same thing, they both are equilibrium constants, like the last person said, Kc just specifies that it is the constant for concentration while on the other hand, Kp, is the constant for pressure at equilibrium.
- Wed Jan 15, 2020 5:09 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: 5.39
- Replies: 4
- Views: 256
Re: 5.39
I am still confused on where the 1/6.1*10^-3 comes from because I get that the table gives us the reverse reaction of what we want and in order to find the Kc of this reaction, we have to take the reciprocal of it. However, according to the table, the Kc for the reverse reaction is 6.1x10^23 and if ...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:33 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: 5H.3
- Replies: 4
- Views: 147
Re: 5H.3
Does anyone know what the very last column is used for?
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:28 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: K values
- Replies: 4
- Views: 223
Re: K values
I believe that if K< 10^-3 than the reaction STRONGLY favors reactants, but if it is greater than this cutoff, it still favors reactants but not strongly? The same goes for if K> 10^3, the reaction strongly favors products but if under the cutoff, then it still favors products but not strongly.
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:25 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: ice tables
- Replies: 3
- Views: 542
Re: ice tables
Ice tables demonstrate the initial concentrations, change in concentration and equilibrium concentration. So yes, by using an ice table you can not only determine the difference in concentrations but can also calculate the change.
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:21 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Q vs K
- Replies: 8
- Views: 233
Re: Q vs K
The reason why the reaction moves forward when the reaction quotient (Q) is less than the equilibrium constant (K) is because the lesser value means that there is less product than there should be when the reaction reaches equilibrium and thus more product is needed, so the reaction moves forward. A...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:14 am
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: Homework 1
- Replies: 18
- Views: 671
Re: Homework 1
For asking a question on chemistry community, just select the "New Topic" tab in the top left corner. First go back to the main Chem 14B page, from there you should be able to select a topic in the tabs below, and when you do, the "New Topic" button in the corner should appear. H...
- Thu Jan 09, 2020 11:07 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Value of Kc and Kp
- Replies: 6
- Views: 208
Re: Value of Kc and Kp
The value of the equilibrium constant when calculating using concentration versus pressure should be the same. I believe the constant only changes if you alter the temperature of the reaction but when alternating between concentration and pressure, the constant should remain the same.