Search found 67 matches
- Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:49 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Ka correlation to strength of an acid
- Replies: 17
- Views: 51
Re: Ka correlation to strength of an acid
The reason why a larger Ka value correlates to a stronger acid is because Ka=[products]/[reactants] and the larger the Ka value is, the more products there are. When there are a lot of products, that means that a lot of the acid (reactant) dissociated which means there will be more H+ ions, making t...
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 11:56 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: HW 5j #5
- Replies: 5
- Views: 58
Re: HW 5j #5
Yes, an increase in pressure would cause the reaction to shift in the direction that reduces the number of gas-phase molecules, but since the number of gas-phase moles on the reactant side and product side is the same, the equilibrium doesn't change.
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 11:47 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: 5J.1
- Replies: 2
- Views: 45
Re: 5J.1
A) Yes, if the partial pressure of CO2 is increased, the reaction will then shift towards the reactants which decreases the partial pressure of H2 as a product. B) Yes, if the partial pressure of CO is decreased, the reaction will shift towards the reactants which means the partial pressure of CO2 w...
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 11:38 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Pressure Changes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 20
Re: Pressure Changes
When you decrease the volume, the pressure increases, so the equilibrium shifts to reduce the number of gas-phase molecules. However, the equilibrium constant, K, is not affected by a change in pressure.
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:30 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Equilibrium Adjustments
- Replies: 9
- Views: 32
Re: Equilibrium Adjustments
This is referring to Le Chatelier’s Principle. When you cause a disturbance to a system, the system tries to reestablish equilibrium by either shifting towards the products or towards the reactants.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:27 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Reaction Quotient
- Replies: 10
- Views: 465
Re: Reaction Quotient
K is the ratio of products to reactants at equilibrium. Q is the reaction quotient that is calculated at any point in time during the reaction. It is similar to K where it is the ratio of products to reactants. You can compare Q to K to determine which way the reaction will proceed to eventually est...
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:24 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: 5I.27
- Replies: 6
- Views: 36
Re: 5I.27
Yes Q < K, but that means that the reaction would proceed to the right, forming products. For part C, since you are given the initial concentrations and the value of Kc, you can use the ICE table to determine the concentrations at equilibrium.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:19 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: 5.39
- Replies: 3
- Views: 72
Re: 5.39
You can refer to https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... rs_7Ed.pdf for the error in the value of Kc.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:14 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: aqueous solutions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 25
Re: aqueous solutions
Aqueous solutions are included in the equilibrium constant equation. However, pure substances like liquids and solids are not.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:10 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: q vs k
- Replies: 62
- Views: 162
Re: q vs k
Yes, Q is the reaction quotient that is calculated at any point in time during the reaction. You can compare Q to K to determine which way the reaction will proceed to eventually establish equilibrium where Q=K.
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:23 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Changes in Concentration
- Replies: 8
- Views: 339
Re: Changes in Concentration
When the concentration of products or reactants is changed, the system shifts in the direction that will reestablish equilibrium. So, if you decrease the concentration of the products, the reaction will shift to the right until the original product:reactant ratio is obtained. Similarly, if you decre...
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:15 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: How does K change during compression/expansion?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 163
Re: How does K change during compression/expansion?
If you compress a system (volume decreases) and pressure increases, the system shifts towards the side with less moles to reestablish equilibrium. If you expand a system (volume increases) and pressure decreases, the system shifts towards the side with more moles to reestablish equilibrium. However,...
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:02 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: temperature change in reactions
- Replies: 11
- Views: 84
Re: temperature change in reactions
If a reaction is endothermic, the reaction will absorb heat and shift to the right which increases the concentration of the products and therefore increases the value of the equilibrium constant. On the other hand, if the reaction is exothermic, that means that the reaction gives off heat and shifts...
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 12:51 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Temperature/Pressure Effect on Equilibirum (Le Chatlier)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 35
Re: Temperature/Pressure Effect on Equilibirum (Le Chatlier)
If a reaction is endothermic, the reaction will absorb heat and shift to the right which increases the concentration of the products and therefore increases the value of the equilibrium constant. On the other hand, if the reaction is exothermic, that means that the reaction gives off heat and shifts...
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 12:42 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Part 2 module review #19
- Replies: 3
- Views: 39
Re: Part 2 module review #19
Yes, you would omit As because it’s a solid and the concentration of a pure substance like a solid will not affect the reaction. The equilibrium constant would then be [H2]^3 / [AsH3]^2.
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:21 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Determining Difference in Electronegativity
- Replies: 2
- Views: 394
Re: Determining Difference in Electronegativity
Electronegativity was experimentally calculated using both ionization energies and electron affinities, so you cannot determine those numbers yourself. I think that a table of electronegativity values should be provided to you, and from there, you can calculate the electronegativity difference betwe...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:15 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Nonmetals?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 146
Re: Nonmetals?
Nonmentals are more electronegative than metals and this is a periodic trend. Electronegativity increases across a period and decreases down a group. It increases across a period because even though the number of electrons are increasing, they’re being added to the same shell, so it doesn’t affect s...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:08 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Defining electronegativity
- Replies: 4
- Views: 71
Re: Defining electronegativity
Electronegativity is how strongly an atom attracts electrons from other atoms.
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:04 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Differences
- Replies: 3
- Views: 52
Re: Differences
Ionization energy is the minimum energy needed to remove an electron from an atom in the gas phase. Electron affinity is the energy released when an electron is added to a gas phase atom. Electronegativity is the electron pulling power of an atom.
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:24 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: HW question 3.77
- Replies: 4
- Views: 381
Re: HW question 3.77
To look at it more concretely, the electronegativity of Carbon, Fluorine, and Hydrogen, are 2.5, 4.0, and 2.1, respectively. The electronegativity difference of CF4 would be 4 - 2.5 which is 1.5. The electronegativity difference of CH4 would be 2.5 - 2.1 which is 0.4. Since 1.5 is bigger than 0.4, t...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:18 pm
- Forum: Amphoteric Compounds
- Topic: Recognizing Amphoteric Compounds
- Replies: 9
- Views: 154
Re: Recognizing Amphoteric Compounds
You can determine if a species is acidic or basic by looking at whether it donates a proton or accepts a proton. If it donates a proton, then it’s acidic. If it accepts a proton, then it’s basic. Amphoteric species are ones that can react with both acids and bases depending on what other species the...
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:22 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: 2F.7
- Replies: 4
- Views: 79
Re: 2F.7
Yes, I agree that it’s similar to 2F.5. You would go through the same process as you did before to find the hybridized orbitals.
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:02 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Electronegativity
- Replies: 4
- Views: 73
Re: Electronegativity
I think that electronegativity is related to the s-character of the hybridized orbitals. The greater the s-character of the hybridized orbitals, the greater the electronegativity because the electrons are held tighter to the nucleus.
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:56 am
- Forum: Sigma & Pi Bonds
- Topic: HW 2F.3.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 100
Re: HW 2F.3.
In H2S, there are 2 sigma bonds and no pi bonds because there are just two single bonds in this molecule. There is only one sigma bond in a single bond. In SO2, there are 2 sigma bonds and 2 pi bonds because there are two double bonds in this molecule. In a double bond, there is one sigma bond and o...
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:55 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: 2F.3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 66
Re: 2F.3
In H2S, there are 2 sigma bonds and no pi bonds because there is just two single bonds in this molecule. In SO2, there are 2 sigma bonds and 2 pi bonds because there are two double bonds in this molecule.
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:49 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: unhybridized orbitals
- Replies: 4
- Views: 49
Re: unhybridized orbitals
I believe that sigma bonds are formed from hybridized orbitals.
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:25 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Electron Configuration
- Replies: 7
- Views: 394
Re: Electron Configuration
I believe the two exceptions that are relevant to this class are chromium and copper.
chromium = [Ar] 3d^5 4s^1
copper = [Ar] 3d^10 4s^1
chromium = [Ar] 3d^5 4s^1
copper = [Ar] 3d^10 4s^1
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:23 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Nitric Oxide
- Replies: 5
- Views: 82
Re: Nitric Oxide
NO is linear and also polar because oxygen is slightly more electronegative than nitrogen. I agree that in this case, the lone electron doesn’t affect the shape because a two atom molecule is always linear, but I’m not too sure as to how it would affect molecules with more than two atoms.
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:47 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Important aspects of Radicals
- Replies: 6
- Views: 74
Re: Important aspects of Radicals
I think the most important thing to know about radicals is that they have an odd number of valence electrons which means there is an unpaired electron, making them much more reactive because they want an electron.
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:26 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Sp3d or dsp3
- Replies: 22
- Views: 863
Re: Sp3d or dsp3
In Dr. Lavelle’s most recent lecture, I believe he said you can write it either way, but I prefer to write it as sp3d.
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:24 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: d hybridized orbital confusion
- Replies: 7
- Views: 57
Re: d hybridized orbital confusion
In Dr. Lavelle’s most recent lecture, I believe he said you can write it either way.
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 1:03 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Electronegativity Ex.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 71
Re: Electronegativity Ex.
To determine which molecule has greater ionic character, you have to look at electronegativity. The greater the difference in electronegativity, the greater ionic character the molecule has because the electrons are being unequally shared. The electronegativity difference between Hydrogen and Chlori...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:55 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Electronegativity and Bond Strength
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1895
Re: Electronegativity and Bond Strength
C—F bonds have the smallest electronegativity difference which means that the C—F bond is the least polar out of the three different bonds. This means that CF4 has the least ionic character while CBr4 has the greatest ionic character. CBr4 has the most unequal sharing of electrons while CF4 has the ...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:49 am
- Forum: Bond Lengths & Energies
- Topic: 3.87 Homework Problem
- Replies: 3
- Views: 921
Re: 3.87 Homework Problem
You can approach this problem by thinking about the atomic radius of each halogen. As the distance between the nuclei of the bonded atoms decrease, then the strength of that bond increases. Out of these three halogens, fluorine has the smallest atomic radius, so the nucleus of Carbon and Fluorine ar...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:48 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Strongest CX bond, where X is a halogen
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1848
Re: Strongest CX bond, where X is a halogen
You can approach this problem by thinking about the atomic radius of each halogen. As the distance between the nuclei of the bonded atoms decrease, then the strength of that bond increases. Out of these three halogens, fluorine has the smallest atomic radius, so the nucleus of Carbon and Fluorine ar...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:46 am
- Forum: Coordinate Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Question 3.87 (Sixth Edition)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 357
Re: Question 3.87 (Sixth Edition)
You can approach this problem by thinking about the atomic radius of each halogen. As the distance between the nuclei of the bonded atoms decreases, then the strength of that bond increases. Out of these three halogens, Fluorine has the smallest atomic radius, so the nucleus of Carbon and Fluorine a...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 2:18 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Textbook Problem 1B.9
- Replies: 5
- Views: 76
Re: Textbook Problem 1B.9
First, you find the total energy by multiplying 2.0 s by the conversion factor 32 W (32 J/s). The seconds will cancel and you will get 64 J as the total energy. Then you have to find the energy per photon. You have to convert given wavelength into meters which is 4.2 x 10^-7 m. Plug this into the eq...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 2:06 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Question 1.27 (Sixth Edition)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 500
Re: Question 1.27 (Sixth Edition)
First, you find the total energy by multiplying 2.0 s by the conversion factor 32 W (32 J/s). The seconds will cancel and you will get 64 J as the total energy. Then you have to find the energy per photon. You have to convert given wavelength into meters which is 4.2 x 10^-7 m. Plug this into the eq...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:58 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Discussion Section Problem
- Replies: 3
- Views: 300
Re: Discussion Section Problem
When you are given the frequency and are asked to find the energy, all you have to do is plug that frequency into the equation, E=hv, where h (Planck’s constant) = 6.63 x 10^-34. When you solved for wavelength and simplified the equation, it resulted in E=h(v/wavelength) which is untrue.
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:50 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Einstein Equation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 92
Re: Einstein Equation
Yes, the equation E=hv is an equation for the energy of an individual photon. If you wanted to find the amount of photons, then you divide the total energy by the energy of a single photon.
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:46 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Sapling Week 4 #23
- Replies: 3
- Views: 118
Re: Sapling Week 4 #23
In this case, you wouldn’t need to multiply by Avogadro’s number because the electron affinity you found is already for one atom.
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:07 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Textbook 1B 25
- Replies: 4
- Views: 72
Re: Textbook 1B 25
For this problem I follow the logic and step/process, but I am confused as to why the delta(v) is only 5 instead of 10. In the equation it says that the speed is 5.0 m/s + or - 5, so wouldn't that mean the uncertainty is 10 not 5? (5 for +5 and 5 for -5) I guess I am confused because I thought in l...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:01 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: delta V. in. Heisenberg questions
- Replies: 6
- Views: 129
Re: delta V. in. Heisenberg questions
I agree that the uncertainty in velocity would be 10 because you multiply by two when there’s a ± because that represents the range of values that the speed could be. I believe that there’s an error in the answer key. You can find the correct solution here. https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-content/s...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:54 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Uncertainty Module Example Question
- Replies: 3
- Views: 76
Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Module Example Question
The process you went through was correct, except you divided by the uncertainty in position again when you were supposed to divide by the mass of the car instead. Another way you could have approached the problem is by isolating Δv from Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Equation (Δx • Δp ≥ h/4pi) first, sinc...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:43 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Indeterminacy Principle Assessment #18
- Replies: 2
- Views: 53
Re: Heisenberg Indeterminacy Principle Assessment #18
First, you would convert the radius into meters which would be 5x10^-11m. You have to multiply the radius by 0.01 because the radius is known to an accuracy of 1%. You should get 5x10^-13m. This is the uncertainty in position and from there you can just plug the uncertainty in position into Heisenbe...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:30 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: heisenberg module #18
- Replies: 3
- Views: 76
Re: heisenberg module #18
First, you would convert the radius into meters which would be 5x10^-11m. You have to multiply the radius by 0.01 because the radius is known to an accuracy of 1%. You should get 5x10^-13m. This is the uncertainty in position and from there you can just plug the uncertainty in position into Heisenbe...
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:20 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: 1B.7 b)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 73
Re: 1B.7 b)
In part a, you found the energy emitted by one atom of sodium which was 3.37x10^-19 J. Since there are 1.31^20 atoms in 5.00mg of Sodium, it emits 1.31x^20 times more energy than one Sodium atom alone. This is why you multiply instead of divide.
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:09 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 106
Re: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
Heisenberg’s Indeterminacy Equation is Δx • Δp ≥ h/4pi. Δx and Δp are inversely related because they are on the same side of the equation and h/4pi needs to stay constant. For example, if uncertainty in position increases, uncertainty in momentum must decrease to keep the right side of the equation ...
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:23 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Post Assessment Q#18
- Replies: 2
- Views: 53
Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Post Assessment Q#18
First, you would convert the radius into meters which would be 5x10^-11m. You have to multiply the radius by 0.01 because the radius is known to an accuracy of 1%. You should get 5x10^-13m. This is the uncertainty in position and from there you can just plug the uncertainty in position into Heisenbe...
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:12 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Multiplying Uncertainty of Speed by two to find deltaV
- Replies: 4
- Views: 51
Re: Multiplying Uncertainty of Speed by two to find deltaV
I believe that you multiply by two when there’s a ± because that represents the range of values that the speed could be. In this case, the uncertainty in velocity should be 10 seconds.
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:08 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Uncertainty in speed
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2013
Re: Uncertainty in speed
Velocity is related to momentum because the product of velocity and mass is equal to momentum. Therefore, uncertainty in velocity is related to uncertainty in position through Heisenberg’s Indeterminacy Equation which is Δx • Δp ≥ h/4pi or Δx • Δv• m ≥ h/4pi
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:09 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: 1B.25
- Replies: 2
- Views: 87
Re: 1B.25
The diameter represents the uncertainty in position because the electron is confined to the space within the lead atom. Since you know Δx and ℏ (“h bar”), you can plug these values into Heisenberg’s Indeterminacy Equation (Δp x Δx ≥ 1/2 ℏ) to solve for Δp. Because the mass of an electron is 9.109x10...
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:02 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: 1B.9 (7th edition)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 445
Re: 1B.9 (7th edition)
First, you calculate 2s•32J/s=64J (total energy). We are also given the wavelength (420nm) which we need to convert to meters in order to plug into the equation (c= λv) and solve for frequency. Once we have the frequency, we can solve for the energy of a photon by multiplying the frequency by Planck...
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:46 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Homework Problem 1B.7
- Replies: 2
- Views: 56
Re: Homework Problem 1B.7
For part b, you find the atoms of sodium in 5.00 mg of sodium by converting from milligrams to grams, then from grams to moles (molar mass of sodium), then from moles to atoms (Avogadro's number). Since you know the energy emitted by one excited sodium atom (part a), you multiply that energy by the ...
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:30 am
- Forum: DeBroglie Equation
- Topic: Measureable-wavelike properties
- Replies: 5
- Views: 66
Re: Measureable-wavelike properties
To be detectable, a particle must have a wavelength of at least 10^-15 m. As the mass of an object increases, the wavelength decreases which makes it more likely that the object has particle-like properties rather than wave-like properties.
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:23 am
- Forum: DeBroglie Equation
- Topic: Use
- Replies: 4
- Views: 143
Re: Use
I believe that the De Broglie equation works for any particle that has momentum (p or mv). It’s helpful in describing smaller particles because their wavelengths can be detected while objects with a larger mass have smaller wavelengths that cannot be detected.
- Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:44 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: Chemistry Review Section E
- Replies: 4
- Views: 247
Re: Chemistry Review Section E
A mole of an ionic compound corresponds to 6.02x10^23 formula units. I think the answers are the same as molecules because the calculations are the same, but the type of particles are different.
- Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:34 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Photoelectric Effect Energy and Excess Energy
- Replies: 9
- Views: 80
Re: Photoelectric Effect Energy and Excess Energy
Amplitude is related to the intensity of light. However, because light isn’t characterized by wave properties only, the intensity of the light (and its amplitude) doesn’t affect whether electrons are ejected or not. This was discovered in the photoelectric experiments.
- Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:12 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Wavelength and KE
- Replies: 5
- Views: 206
Re: Wavelength and KE
From the Kinetic Energy equation, you can isolate velocity and then substitute it into De Broglie's equation. This will give you: λ = h/√(2mKE). To solve for the wavelength, you can then plug in the value that you’re given for kinetic energy along with Planck’s constant and the mass of an electron w...
- Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:02 pm
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Homework problem Fundamentals E.15
- Replies: 3
- Views: 458
Re: Homework problem Fundamentals E.15
You are trying to figure out the identity of the metal in the metal hydroxide. In order to do that, you have to subtract the molar mass of (OH)₂ from the total molar mass of the metal hydroxide which is 74.10 g/mol. 74.10-34=40.1 g/mol. Using your periodic table, you will find that Calcium (Ca) has ...
- Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:37 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Photons
- Replies: 3
- Views: 227
Re: Photons
Although photons are extremely small particles of light, research suggests that photons are actually detectable by the human eye. Scientists discovered that once you are able to see a photon, there is a higher chance that you’ll be able to detect another photon shortly after that.
- Thu Oct 08, 2020 2:00 am
- Forum: Balancing Chemical Reactions
- Topic: Fundamental Exercise H7
- Replies: 5
- Views: 55
Re: Fundamental Exercise H7
Catalysts don’t affect chemical equations since they are not consumed in reactions. Catalysts aren’t considered reactants or products, so they just appear above the yield arrow, if you were to include it in the chemical equation.
- Thu Oct 08, 2020 1:52 am
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Inaccurate Answer
- Replies: 4
- Views: 101
Re: Inaccurate Answer
The book could just be rounding to a different number of sig figs than you are. Because the difference between the book’s values and your values are so small, it doesn’t cause a major discrepancy. I would continue to use your atomic masses because they include up to the thousandths place which is mo...
- Thu Oct 08, 2020 1:43 am
- Forum: Accuracy, Precision, Mole, Other Definitions
- Topic: Textbook L. 35
- Replies: 3
- Views: 77
Re: Textbook L. 35
Yes, instead of FeBr2, it should be Fe3Br8.
- Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:29 am
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: Formula Units?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 181
Re: Formula Units?
A mole of an ionic compound corresponds to 6.02x10^23 formula units. To find the amount of formula units in 5.15g of Magnesium Sulfate Heptahydrate, you divide by the molar mass of this compound, then multiply by Avogadro’s number.
- Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:11 am
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: Prefixes
- Replies: 6
- Views: 141
Re: Prefixes
I think that it would be best to just memorize all of the prefixes so it’s easier when you’re doing conversions. It’s especially important to have the most commonly used prefixes memorized.
- Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:56 am
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Empirical to Molecular Formulas [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 153
Re: Empirical to Molecular Formulas [ENDORSED]
Once you’ve found the empirical formula, you need to calculate its molar mass. The molar mass of the molecular formula will be given. You divide the molecular molar mass by the empirical molar mass and this will result in a whole number, approximately. To find the molecular formula, you multiply eac...