Search found 102 matches
- Mon Mar 08, 2021 11:05 am
- Forum: General Rate Laws
- Topic: 7C.7
- Replies: 5
- Views: 477
Re: 7C.7
To determine the rate of a reaction, you look at the slow step because it is the rate determining step. In this case, since the first step is the slow step, the rate would be k[NO][Br2].
- Mon Mar 08, 2021 11:03 am
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: 7B.5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 447
Re: 7B.5
For part a, since you are given the rate constant, you can solve for the half life using the equation t1/2 = 0.693/k. For part b, you would use the first order integrated rate law which is [A] = [A]0e^-kt. [A] = 0.0567e^-(3.7x10^-5)(12,600) [A] = 0.036M For part c, you use the same equation except n...
- Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:57 am
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: Textbook Problem 7B.3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 258
Re: Textbook Problem 7B.3
I found the molarity of A which I found to be 0.068M. I subtracted that from its initial concentration (0.153M). This will give you [A] which is 0.085M. Now that you know [A] and [A]0, you can solve for the rate constant using the first order integrated rate law which is [A] = [A]0e^-kt
- Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:50 am
- Forum: Zero Order Reactions
- Topic: kind of reaction
- Replies: 25
- Views: 1212
Re: kind of reaction
A zero order reaction is independent of the concentration of reactants. It has a graph of [A] vs t that is a decreasing linear graph where the slope is -k.
- Mon Mar 08, 2021 10:47 am
- Forum: Zero Order Reactions
- Topic: q. 6
- Replies: 3
- Views: 352
Re: q. 6
The [X] vs t graph is a decreasing linear graph because X is a reactant which means that its concentration decreases as the reaction progresses.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:39 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Textbook 6K 3d
- Replies: 2
- Views: 208
Re: Textbook 6K 3d
I believe the reaction should be: Cl2 (g) —> HClO (aq) + Cl- (aq)
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:34 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Sapling Week 7/8 #5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 262
Re: Sapling Week 7/8 #5
I agree ^^ You just wrote 3S- (aq) instead of 3S2- (aq).
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:31 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Sapling Week 7/8 - Question #5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 254
Re: Sapling Week 7/8 - Question #5
I think you just have to be careful when you enter the equation in and also reevaluate the stoichiometric coefficient of water. It should read [Pb(OH)4]2- (aq) + ClO- (aq) —> PbO2 (s) + Cl- (aq) + H2O (l) + 2OH- (aq)
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 2:27 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Textbook Problem 6K.5 a
- Replies: 2
- Views: 143
Re: Textbook Problem 6K.5 a
Bromine is being oxidized because the charge goes from -1 to +5, so it’s losing electrons. This means that Br- is the reducing agent and O3 is the oxidizing agent.
- Mon Mar 01, 2021 1:50 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Textbook Problem 6K.1
- Replies: 2
- Views: 233
Re: Textbook Problem 6K.1
Reaction at the anode: C2H5OH (aq) —> C2H4O (aq) + 2H+ (aq) +2e- Reaction at the cathode: Cr2O72- (aq) + 14H+ (aq) +6e- —> 2Cr3+ (aq) +7H2O(l) You have to multiply the first reaction by 3 so that 6 electrons will be transferred. When you multiply it by 3, you get: 3C2H5OH (aq) —> 3C2H4O (aq) + 6H+ (...
- Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:16 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Equations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 349
Re: Equations
You would use -P(delta V) when there is a constant external pressure. You use -nRTln(V2/V1) when the reaction is an isothermal, reversible one.
- Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:15 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Homework Problem 4A.3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 389
Re: Homework Problem 4A.3
For part a, you would use the formula: w = -P•deltaV, since the external pressure is constant. To find the change in volume, you would use the formula for the volume of a cylinder which is πr^2•deltah. The work would be positive with respect to the air in the pump and since heat doesn’t affect this ...
- Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:11 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Homework Problem 4B.13
- Replies: 2
- Views: 325
Re: Homework Problem 4B.13
Since it’s an isothermal, reversible expansion, you would use the formula: w = -nRTln(V2/V1). You use the ideal gas law (PV = nRT) to find the amount of moles. V2 would be 6.52L and V1 would be 4.29L. You plug in all the values you know to solve for work.
- Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:08 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Irreversible Vs. Reversible Expansion
- Replies: 4
- Views: 407
Re: Irreversible Vs. Reversible Expansion
When there is an irreversible expansion, you use the formula: w = -P•deltaV where P is the external pressure which is constant. When there is an isothermal reversible expansion, you use the formula: w = -nRT•ln(V2/V1).
- Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:05 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Topic 4A Exercises: 4A. 13
- Replies: 2
- Views: 322
Re: Topic 4A Exercises: 4A. 13
First, you find the heat capacity of the calorimeter with the formula q = C•deltaT (you use 7.32 for delta T and 3.50 for q). Then, you use that heat capacity and the same formula to find the heat of surroundings of the second experiment. The heat of the system is the opposite of the heat of surroun...
- Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:46 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Homework question 4B.13
- Replies: 5
- Views: 288
Re: Homework question 4B.13
I think the manual is correct. You first find the moles of gas with the ideal gas law (PV = nRT). Then you use the formula w = -nRTln(V2/V1) and you use the gas constant 8.3145 J/K•mol. You should then get -326J.
- Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:41 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Degeneracy
- Replies: 11
- Views: 919
Re: Degeneracy
Degeneracy is the number of ways of achieving a given energy state. This is applied to thermodynamics because it’s related to entropy. As degeneracy increases, there is more disorder and therefore has more entropy.
- Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:29 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: closed system energy change
- Replies: 16
- Views: 847
Re: closed system energy change
No, they are different. Heat is represented by q and work is represented by w. q + w is equal to the change in internal energy of the closed system.
- Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:24 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: closed and open system better understandable and explaination
- Replies: 6
- Views: 434
Re: closed and open system better understandable and explaination
I’m not sure as to what you’re referring to because that’s a big chunk of the lecture, but an open system is one that can exchange both matter AND energy with its surroundings (doesn’t insulate), a closed system is one that only can exchange energy with the surroundings (doesn’t insulate), and an is...
- Tue Feb 16, 2021 6:20 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: 4C.1
- Replies: 3
- Views: 223
Re: 4C.1
The reason why NO2 has a higher heat capacity than NO is because it’s a more complex molecule which requires more heat to raise the temperature by 1 degree Celcius.
- Mon Feb 08, 2021 4:23 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Most accurate method
- Replies: 6
- Views: 365
Re: Most accurate method
Bond enthalpies is the least accurate method because it uses the average enthalpy from many different molecules while Hess’s Law and standard enthalpies of formation are more accurate but also more or less equivalent in accuracy with each other.
- Mon Feb 08, 2021 4:19 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: specific heat of water
- Replies: 2
- Views: 158
Re: specific heat of water
Since q(surroundings) = -q(system), you would find the heat gained by the cold water which is equal to the heat lost by the hot water.
m(cold water)•c•deltaT(cold water) = -m(hot water)•c•deltaT(hot water)
(440)(4.184)(Tf - 25) = -100(4.184)(Tf - 95)
Tf = 38°C
m(cold water)•c•deltaT(cold water) = -m(hot water)•c•deltaT(hot water)
(440)(4.184)(Tf - 25) = -100(4.184)(Tf - 95)
Tf = 38°C
- Mon Feb 08, 2021 4:15 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Calculating Bond Enthalpies
- Replies: 4
- Views: 273
Re: Calculating Bond Enthalpies
The formula for determining bond enthalpies is different from that of standard enthalpy of formation. The formula you would use to calculate the bond enthalpy is: (enthalpy of formation of reactants) - (enthalpy of formation of products).
- Mon Feb 08, 2021 2:42 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: hw problem #8
- Replies: 3
- Views: 209
Re: hw problem #8
You would do 371 kJ x (4 mol CS2 / 358.8 kJ) = moles of CS2 produced. You would then use the molar mass of CS2 to convert from moles of CS2 to mass of CS2 in grams.
- Mon Feb 08, 2021 2:36 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Sapling Question #14
- Replies: 2
- Views: 147
Re: Sapling Question #14
In the first step of Path B, it says that the gas is cooled at constant volume which means that the final volume is the same as the initial volume. Since delta V is final volume minus initial volume, delta V is zero.
- Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:56 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Units for K
- Replies: 29
- Views: 1276
Re: Units for K
I believe that the units cancel out leaving you with just the ratio of products to reactants.
- Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:42 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: response to change in equilibria
- Replies: 6
- Views: 396
Re: response to change in equilibria
When you increase the pressure, the reaction shifts towards the side with the least moles of gas because it wants to reestablish equilibrium. On the other hand, when you decrease the pressure, the reaction shifts towards the side with more moles of gas because it wants to return to the pressure it w...
- Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:33 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: 5J.13 and Ideal Gas Law
- Replies: 8
- Views: 632
Re: 5J.13 and Ideal Gas Law
Yes, you don’t have to calculate anything in this problem. All you have to do is look at the two K values and use Le Chatelier’s Principle. When the equilibrium mixture is heated, the K value decreases, so that means there’s more reactants than products and there will be less ammonia present since i...
- Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:24 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Partial pressure plot
- Replies: 2
- Views: 178
Re: Partial pressure plot
To find the ratios between the compounds, you compare the change in their partial pressures. The partial pressure of compound A changed by around 10. The partial pressure of compound B changed by around 5. The partial pressure of compound C changed by around 10. The ratio of A to B to C would be 2:1...
- Mon Feb 01, 2021 7:20 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Sapling Weeks 3+4 #14
- Replies: 5
- Views: 388
Re: Sapling Weeks 3+4 #14
For Path A, since it’s an isothermal, reversible expansion, you would use the equation: w = -nRTln(V final/V initial). For the first step of path B, because the volume remains constant, there is no work done. In the second step of path B, you use the formula: w = -Pex•deltaV.
- Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:55 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: 5J.5 part d in Textbook Problems
- Replies: 4
- Views: 145
Re: 5J.5 part d in Textbook Problems
That’s a typo! You can refer to the correct chemical equation here: https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-content/supporting-files/Chem14B/Solution_Manual_Errors_7Ed.pdf The answer would be no change because there are two moles of HD gas on the reactants side and one mole of H2 gas plus one mole of D2 ga...
- Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:53 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: 5J #5 part d
- Replies: 2
- Views: 107
Re: 5J #5 part d
That’s a typo! You can refer to the correct chemical equation here: https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... rs_7Ed.pdf
- Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:49 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: 5.33
- Replies: 3
- Views: 109
Re: 5.33
The reactant, X2, is a diatomic molecule which means that bonds need to be broken in order to get the product, 2 individual molecules of X. Breaking bonds requires energy which means that the process is endothermic. Since the reaction is endothermic, heat is on the left side of the chemical equation...
- Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:48 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Textbook Problem 5J.11 Part D
- Replies: 3
- Views: 111
Re: Textbook Problem 5J.11 Part D
The reactant, X2, is a diatomic molecule which means that bonds need to be broken in order to get the product, 2 individual molecules of X. Breaking bonds requires energy which means that the process is endothermic. Since the reaction is endothermic, heat is on the left side of the chemical equation...
- Mon Jan 25, 2021 12:33 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Determining Acid Dissociation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 92
Re: Determining Acid Dissociation
A conjugate acid is the species that is left after a base is protonated, so it would have one more H+ ion than the base that formed it. A conjugate base is the species that is left after an acid is deprotonated, so it would have one less H+ ion than the acid that formed it.
- Wed Jan 20, 2021 12:49 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Ka correlation to strength of an acid
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2316
Re: Ka correlation to strength of an acid
The reason why a larger Ka value correlates to a stronger acid is because Ka=[products]/[reactants] and the larger the Ka value is, the more products there are. When there are a lot of products, that means that a lot of the acid (reactant) dissociated which means there will be more H+ ions, making t...
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 11:56 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: HW 5j #5
- Replies: 5
- Views: 157
Re: HW 5j #5
Yes, an increase in pressure would cause the reaction to shift in the direction that reduces the number of gas-phase molecules, but since the number of gas-phase moles on the reactant side and product side is the same, the equilibrium doesn't change.
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 11:47 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: 5J.1
- Replies: 2
- Views: 950
Re: 5J.1
A) Yes, if the partial pressure of CO2 is increased, the reaction will then shift towards the reactants which decreases the partial pressure of H2 as a product. B) Yes, if the partial pressure of CO is decreased, the reaction will shift towards the reactants which means the partial pressure of CO2 w...
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 11:38 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Pressure Changes
- Replies: 3
- Views: 91
Re: Pressure Changes
When you decrease the volume, the pressure increases, so the equilibrium shifts to reduce the number of gas-phase molecules. However, the equilibrium constant, K, is not affected by a change in pressure.
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:30 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Equilibrium Adjustments
- Replies: 10
- Views: 480
Re: Equilibrium Adjustments
This is referring to Le Chatelier’s Principle. When you cause a disturbance to a system, the system tries to reestablish equilibrium by either shifting towards the products or towards the reactants.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:27 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Reaction Quotient
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1012
Re: Reaction Quotient
K is the ratio of products to reactants at equilibrium. Q is the reaction quotient that is calculated at any point in time during the reaction. It is similar to K where it is the ratio of products to reactants. You can compare Q to K to determine which way the reaction will proceed to eventually est...
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:24 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: 5I.27
- Replies: 6
- Views: 186
Re: 5I.27
Yes Q < K, but that means that the reaction would proceed to the right, forming products. For part C, since you are given the initial concentrations and the value of Kc, you can use the ICE table to determine the concentrations at equilibrium.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:19 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: 5.39
- Replies: 3
- Views: 244
Re: 5.39
You can refer to https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-conten ... rs_7Ed.pdf for the error in the value of Kc.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:14 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: aqueous solutions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 387
Re: aqueous solutions
Aqueous solutions are included in the equilibrium constant equation. However, pure substances like liquids and solids are not.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 1:10 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: q vs k
- Replies: 62
- Views: 2703
Re: q vs k
Yes, Q is the reaction quotient that is calculated at any point in time during the reaction. You can compare Q to K to determine which way the reaction will proceed to eventually establish equilibrium where Q=K.
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:23 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Changes in Concentration
- Replies: 8
- Views: 756
Re: Changes in Concentration
When the concentration of products or reactants is changed, the system shifts in the direction that will reestablish equilibrium. So, if you decrease the concentration of the products, the reaction will shift to the right until the original product:reactant ratio is obtained. Similarly, if you decre...
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:15 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: How does K change during compression/expansion?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 945
Re: How does K change during compression/expansion?
If you compress a system (volume decreases) and pressure increases, the system shifts towards the side with less moles to reestablish equilibrium. If you expand a system (volume increases) and pressure decreases, the system shifts towards the side with more moles to reestablish equilibrium. However,...
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 1:02 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: temperature change in reactions
- Replies: 11
- Views: 428
Re: temperature change in reactions
If a reaction is endothermic, the reaction will absorb heat and shift to the right which increases the concentration of the products and therefore increases the value of the equilibrium constant. On the other hand, if the reaction is exothermic, that means that the reaction gives off heat and shifts...
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 12:51 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Temperature/Pressure Effect on Equilibirum (Le Chatlier)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 329
Re: Temperature/Pressure Effect on Equilibirum (Le Chatlier)
If a reaction is endothermic, the reaction will absorb heat and shift to the right which increases the concentration of the products and therefore increases the value of the equilibrium constant. On the other hand, if the reaction is exothermic, that means that the reaction gives off heat and shifts...
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 12:42 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Part 2 module review #19
- Replies: 3
- Views: 213
Re: Part 2 module review #19
Yes, you would omit As because it’s a solid and the concentration of a pure substance like a solid will not affect the reaction. The equilibrium constant would then be [H2]^3 / [AsH3]^2.
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:21 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Determining Difference in Electronegativity
- Replies: 13
- Views: 1011
Re: Determining Difference in Electronegativity
Electronegativity was experimentally calculated using both ionization energies and electron affinities, so you cannot determine those numbers yourself. I think that a table of electronegativity values should be provided to you, and from there, you can calculate the electronegativity difference betwe...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:15 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Nonmetals?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 468
Re: Nonmetals?
Nonmentals are more electronegative than metals and this is a periodic trend. Electronegativity increases across a period and decreases down a group. It increases across a period because even though the number of electrons are increasing, they’re being added to the same shell, so it doesn’t affect s...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:08 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Defining electronegativity
- Replies: 6
- Views: 838
Re: Defining electronegativity
Electronegativity is how strongly an atom attracts electrons from other atoms.
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 3:04 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Differences
- Replies: 3
- Views: 302
Re: Differences
Ionization energy is the minimum energy needed to remove an electron from an atom in the gas phase. Electron affinity is the energy released when an electron is added to a gas phase atom. Electronegativity is the electron pulling power of an atom.
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:24 pm
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: HW question 3.77
- Replies: 4
- Views: 941
Re: HW question 3.77
To look at it more concretely, the electronegativity of Carbon, Fluorine, and Hydrogen, are 2.5, 4.0, and 2.1, respectively. The electronegativity difference of CF4 would be 4 - 2.5 which is 1.5. The electronegativity difference of CH4 would be 2.5 - 2.1 which is 0.4. Since 1.5 is bigger than 0.4, t...
- Mon Dec 07, 2020 2:18 pm
- Forum: Amphoteric Compounds
- Topic: Recognizing Amphoteric Compounds
- Replies: 9
- Views: 761
Re: Recognizing Amphoteric Compounds
You can determine if a species is acidic or basic by looking at whether it donates a proton or accepts a proton. If it donates a proton, then it’s acidic. If it accepts a proton, then it’s basic. Amphoteric species are ones that can react with both acids and bases depending on what other species the...
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:22 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: 2F.7
- Replies: 4
- Views: 252
Re: 2F.7
Yes, I agree that it’s similar to 2F.5. You would go through the same process as you did before to find the hybridized orbitals.
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:02 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Electronegativity
- Replies: 4
- Views: 301
Re: Electronegativity
I think that electronegativity is related to the s-character of the hybridized orbitals. The greater the s-character of the hybridized orbitals, the greater the electronegativity because the electrons are held tighter to the nucleus.
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:56 am
- Forum: Sigma & Pi Bonds
- Topic: HW 2F.3.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 968
Re: HW 2F.3.
In H2S, there are 2 sigma bonds and no pi bonds because there are just two single bonds in this molecule. There is only one sigma bond in a single bond. In SO2, there are 2 sigma bonds and 2 pi bonds because there are two double bonds in this molecule. In a double bond, there is one sigma bond and o...
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:55 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: 2F.3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 170
Re: 2F.3
In H2S, there are 2 sigma bonds and no pi bonds because there is just two single bonds in this molecule. In SO2, there are 2 sigma bonds and 2 pi bonds because there are two double bonds in this molecule.
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:49 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: unhybridized orbitals
- Replies: 4
- Views: 168
Re: unhybridized orbitals
I believe that sigma bonds are formed from hybridized orbitals.
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:25 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Electron Configuration
- Replies: 7
- Views: 718
Re: Electron Configuration
I believe the two exceptions that are relevant to this class are chromium and copper.
chromium = [Ar] 3d^5 4s^1
copper = [Ar] 3d^10 4s^1
chromium = [Ar] 3d^5 4s^1
copper = [Ar] 3d^10 4s^1
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 7:23 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Nitric Oxide
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1383
Re: Nitric Oxide
NO is linear and also polar because oxygen is slightly more electronegative than nitrogen. I agree that in this case, the lone electron doesn’t affect the shape because a two atom molecule is always linear, but I’m not too sure as to how it would affect molecules with more than two atoms.
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:47 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Important aspects of Radicals
- Replies: 6
- Views: 327
Re: Important aspects of Radicals
I think the most important thing to know about radicals is that they have an odd number of valence electrons which means there is an unpaired electron, making them much more reactive because they want an electron.
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:26 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Sp3d or dsp3
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2219
Re: Sp3d or dsp3
In Dr. Lavelle’s most recent lecture, I believe he said you can write it either way, but I prefer to write it as sp3d.
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:24 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: d hybridized orbital confusion
- Replies: 7
- Views: 373
Re: d hybridized orbital confusion
In Dr. Lavelle’s most recent lecture, I believe he said you can write it either way.
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 1:03 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Electronegativity Ex.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 255
Re: Electronegativity Ex.
To determine which molecule has greater ionic character, you have to look at electronegativity. The greater the difference in electronegativity, the greater ionic character the molecule has because the electrons are being unequally shared. The electronegativity difference between Hydrogen and Chlori...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:55 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Electronegativity and Bond Strength
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3768
Re: Electronegativity and Bond Strength
C—F bonds have the smallest electronegativity difference which means that the C—F bond is the least polar out of the three different bonds. This means that CF4 has the least ionic character while CBr4 has the greatest ionic character. CBr4 has the most unequal sharing of electrons while CF4 has the ...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:49 am
- Forum: Bond Lengths & Energies
- Topic: 3.87 Homework Problem
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1387
Re: 3.87 Homework Problem
You can approach this problem by thinking about the atomic radius of each halogen. As the distance between the nuclei of the bonded atoms decrease, then the strength of that bond increases. Out of these three halogens, fluorine has the smallest atomic radius, so the nucleus of Carbon and Fluorine ar...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:48 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: Strongest CX bond, where X is a halogen
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2326
Re: Strongest CX bond, where X is a halogen
You can approach this problem by thinking about the atomic radius of each halogen. As the distance between the nuclei of the bonded atoms decrease, then the strength of that bond increases. Out of these three halogens, fluorine has the smallest atomic radius, so the nucleus of Carbon and Fluorine ar...
- Wed Nov 18, 2020 12:46 am
- Forum: Coordinate Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Question 3.87 (Sixth Edition)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 555
Re: Question 3.87 (Sixth Edition)
You can approach this problem by thinking about the atomic radius of each halogen. As the distance between the nuclei of the bonded atoms decreases, then the strength of that bond increases. Out of these three halogens, Fluorine has the smallest atomic radius, so the nucleus of Carbon and Fluorine a...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 2:18 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Textbook Problem 1B.9
- Replies: 5
- Views: 532
Re: Textbook Problem 1B.9
First, you find the total energy by multiplying 2.0 s by the conversion factor 32 W (32 J/s). The seconds will cancel and you will get 64 J as the total energy. Then you have to find the energy per photon. You have to convert given wavelength into meters which is 4.2 x 10^-7 m. Plug this into the eq...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 2:06 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Question 1.27 (Sixth Edition)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 889
Re: Question 1.27 (Sixth Edition)
First, you find the total energy by multiplying 2.0 s by the conversion factor 32 W (32 J/s). The seconds will cancel and you will get 64 J as the total energy. Then you have to find the energy per photon. You have to convert given wavelength into meters which is 4.2 x 10^-7 m. Plug this into the eq...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:58 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Discussion Section Problem
- Replies: 8
- Views: 771
Re: Discussion Section Problem
When you are given the frequency and are asked to find the energy, all you have to do is plug that frequency into the equation, E=hv, where h (Planck’s constant) = 6.63 x 10^-34. When you solved for wavelength and simplified the equation, it resulted in E=h(v/wavelength) which is untrue.
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:50 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Einstein Equation [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 433
Re: Einstein Equation [ENDORSED]
Yes, the equation E=hv is an equation for the energy of an individual photon. If you wanted to find the amount of photons, then you divide the total energy by the energy of a single photon.
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 1:46 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Sapling Week 4 #23
- Replies: 3
- Views: 438
Re: Sapling Week 4 #23
In this case, you wouldn’t need to multiply by Avogadro’s number because the electron affinity you found is already for one atom.
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:07 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Textbook 1B 25
- Replies: 4
- Views: 232
Re: Textbook 1B 25
For this problem I follow the logic and step/process, but I am confused as to why the delta(v) is only 5 instead of 10. In the equation it says that the speed is 5.0 m/s + or - 5, so wouldn't that mean the uncertainty is 10 not 5? (5 for +5 and 5 for -5) I guess I am confused because I thought in l...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:01 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: delta V. in. Heisenberg questions
- Replies: 6
- Views: 575
Re: delta V. in. Heisenberg questions
I agree that the uncertainty in velocity would be 10 because you multiply by two when there’s a ± because that represents the range of values that the speed could be. I believe that there’s an error in the answer key. You can find the correct solution here. https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-content/s...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:54 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Uncertainty Module Example Question
- Replies: 3
- Views: 299
Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Module Example Question
The process you went through was correct, except you divided by the uncertainty in position again when you were supposed to divide by the mass of the car instead. Another way you could have approached the problem is by isolating Δv from Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Equation (Δx • Δp ≥ h/4pi) first, sinc...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:43 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Indeterminacy Principle Assessment #18
- Replies: 2
- Views: 275
Re: Heisenberg Indeterminacy Principle Assessment #18
First, you would convert the radius into meters which would be 5x10^-11m. You have to multiply the radius by 0.01 because the radius is known to an accuracy of 1%. You should get 5x10^-13m. This is the uncertainty in position and from there you can just plug the uncertainty in position into Heisenbe...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 10:30 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: heisenberg module #18
- Replies: 3
- Views: 307
Re: heisenberg module #18
First, you would convert the radius into meters which would be 5x10^-11m. You have to multiply the radius by 0.01 because the radius is known to an accuracy of 1%. You should get 5x10^-13m. This is the uncertainty in position and from there you can just plug the uncertainty in position into Heisenbe...
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:20 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: 1B.7 b)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 163
Re: 1B.7 b)
In part a, you found the energy emitted by one atom of sodium which was 3.37x10^-19 J. Since there are 1.31^20 atoms in 5.00mg of Sodium, it emits 1.31x^20 times more energy than one Sodium atom alone. This is why you multiply instead of divide.
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:09 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Replies: 5
- Views: 395
Re: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
Heisenberg’s Indeterminacy Equation is Δx • Δp ≥ h/4pi. Δx and Δp are inversely related because they are on the same side of the equation and h/4pi needs to stay constant. For example, if uncertainty in position increases, uncertainty in momentum must decrease to keep the right side of the equation ...
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:23 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Post Assessment Q#18
- Replies: 2
- Views: 161
Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Post Assessment Q#18
First, you would convert the radius into meters which would be 5x10^-11m. You have to multiply the radius by 0.01 because the radius is known to an accuracy of 1%. You should get 5x10^-13m. This is the uncertainty in position and from there you can just plug the uncertainty in position into Heisenbe...
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:12 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Multiplying Uncertainty of Speed by two to find deltaV
- Replies: 4
- Views: 166
Re: Multiplying Uncertainty of Speed by two to find deltaV
I believe that you multiply by two when there’s a ± because that represents the range of values that the speed could be. In this case, the uncertainty in velocity should be 10 seconds.
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:08 pm
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Uncertainty in speed
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2418
Re: Uncertainty in speed
Velocity is related to momentum because the product of velocity and mass is equal to momentum. Therefore, uncertainty in velocity is related to uncertainty in position through Heisenberg’s Indeterminacy Equation which is Δx • Δp ≥ h/4pi or Δx • Δv• m ≥ h/4pi
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:09 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: 1B.25
- Replies: 4
- Views: 309
Re: 1B.25
The diameter represents the uncertainty in position because the electron is confined to the space within the lead atom. Since you know Δx and ℏ (“h bar”), you can plug these values into Heisenberg’s Indeterminacy Equation (Δp x Δx ≥ 1/2 ℏ) to solve for Δp. Because the mass of an electron is 9.109x10...
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:02 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: 1B.9 (7th edition)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 841
Re: 1B.9 (7th edition)
First, you calculate 2s•32J/s=64J (total energy). We are also given the wavelength (420nm) which we need to convert to meters in order to plug into the equation (c= λv) and solve for frequency. Once we have the frequency, we can solve for the energy of a photon by multiplying the frequency by Planck...
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:46 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Homework Problem 1B.7
- Replies: 2
- Views: 114
Re: Homework Problem 1B.7
For part b, you find the atoms of sodium in 5.00 mg of sodium by converting from milligrams to grams, then from grams to moles (molar mass of sodium), then from moles to atoms (Avogadro's number). Since you know the energy emitted by one excited sodium atom (part a), you multiply that energy by the ...
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:30 am
- Forum: DeBroglie Equation
- Topic: Measureable-wavelike properties
- Replies: 5
- Views: 269
Re: Measureable-wavelike properties
To be detectable, a particle must have a wavelength of at least 10^-15 m. As the mass of an object increases, the wavelength decreases which makes it more likely that the object has particle-like properties rather than wave-like properties.
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 2:23 am
- Forum: DeBroglie Equation
- Topic: Use
- Replies: 4
- Views: 333
Re: Use
I believe that the De Broglie equation works for any particle that has momentum (p or mv). It’s helpful in describing smaller particles because their wavelengths can be detected while objects with a larger mass have smaller wavelengths that cannot be detected.
- Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:44 pm
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: Chemistry Review Section E
- Replies: 4
- Views: 441
Re: Chemistry Review Section E
A mole of an ionic compound corresponds to 6.02x10^23 formula units. I think the answers are the same as molecules because the calculations are the same, but the type of particles are different.
- Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:34 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Photoelectric Effect Energy and Excess Energy
- Replies: 9
- Views: 228
Re: Photoelectric Effect Energy and Excess Energy
Amplitude is related to the intensity of light. However, because light isn’t characterized by wave properties only, the intensity of the light (and its amplitude) doesn’t affect whether electrons are ejected or not. This was discovered in the photoelectric experiments.
- Tue Oct 13, 2020 5:12 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Wavelength and KE
- Replies: 5
- Views: 927
Re: Wavelength and KE
From the Kinetic Energy equation, you can isolate velocity and then substitute it into De Broglie's equation. This will give you: λ = h/√(2mKE). To solve for the wavelength, you can then plug in the value that you’re given for kinetic energy along with Planck’s constant and the mass of an electron w...
- Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:02 pm
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Homework problem Fundamentals E.15
- Replies: 3
- Views: 768
Re: Homework problem Fundamentals E.15
You are trying to figure out the identity of the metal in the metal hydroxide. In order to do that, you have to subtract the molar mass of (OH)₂ from the total molar mass of the metal hydroxide which is 74.10 g/mol. 74.10-34=40.1 g/mol. Using your periodic table, you will find that Calcium (Ca) has ...
- Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:37 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Photons
- Replies: 3
- Views: 385
Re: Photons
Although photons are extremely small particles of light, research suggests that photons are actually detectable by the human eye. Scientists discovered that once you are able to see a photon, there is a higher chance that you’ll be able to detect another photon shortly after that.
- Thu Oct 08, 2020 2:00 am
- Forum: Balancing Chemical Reactions
- Topic: Fundamental Exercise H7
- Replies: 5
- Views: 181
Re: Fundamental Exercise H7
Catalysts don’t affect chemical equations since they are not consumed in reactions. Catalysts aren’t considered reactants or products, so they just appear above the yield arrow, if you were to include it in the chemical equation.
- Thu Oct 08, 2020 1:52 am
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Inaccurate Answer
- Replies: 4
- Views: 221
Re: Inaccurate Answer
The book could just be rounding to a different number of sig figs than you are. Because the difference between the book’s values and your values are so small, it doesn’t cause a major discrepancy. I would continue to use your atomic masses because they include up to the thousandths place which is mo...
- Thu Oct 08, 2020 1:43 am
- Forum: Accuracy, Precision, Mole, Other Definitions
- Topic: Textbook L. 35
- Replies: 3
- Views: 276
Re: Textbook L. 35
Yes, instead of FeBr2, it should be Fe3Br8.
- Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:29 am
- Forum: SI Units, Unit Conversions
- Topic: Formula Units?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 760
Re: Formula Units?
A mole of an ionic compound corresponds to 6.02x10^23 formula units. To find the amount of formula units in 5.15g of Magnesium Sulfate Heptahydrate, you divide by the molar mass of this compound, then multiply by Avogadro’s number.