Hi! I am not sure how to determine and compare the acidic strength between H3PO3 and H3PO4.
Could someone explain it?
Search found 50 matches
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 12:05 am
- Forum: Polyprotic Acids & Bases
- Topic: Which one is more acidic: H3PO3 or H3PO4
- Replies: 9
- Views: 69
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 12:00 am
- Forum: Conjugate Acids & Bases
- Topic: Proton Transfer
- Replies: 3
- Views: 23
Re: Proton Transfer
Hi! I think in this question, C6H5NH3+ is a weak acid. So the equation is C6H5NH3+ + H2O --> C6H5NH2 + H3O+ Totally agree with Victor. The +1 charge is a hint for the weak acid.
- Thu Dec 10, 2020 11:33 pm
- Forum: Conjugate Acids & Bases
- Topic: Textbook question 6.21
- Replies: 2
- Views: 32
Re: Textbook question 6.21
Hi! I think not every atom with lone pairs could accept protons. But N atom with three bonds usually can accept one proton. So in this case, 2 protons can be accepted by this base.
- Thu Dec 10, 2020 11:23 pm
- Forum: Conjugate Acids & Bases
- Topic: Can strong acids become conjugate bases?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 52
Re: Can strong acids become conjugate bases?
Hi! All acids have conjugate bases. Strong acids usually have weak conjugate bases. Weak acids, on the other hand, have strong conjugate bases.
- Thu Dec 10, 2020 11:20 pm
- Forum: Conjugate Acids & Bases
- Topic: Sapling #13
- Replies: 3
- Views: 29
Re: Sapling #13
Hi! To get the answer, you need to compare the pH and pKa. If the pKa is lower than pH, which means the HA is more acidic than the solution, HA will be ionized into H+ and A-. Thus this acid is negatively charged. Otherwise, (pKa is higher than pH), it'll remain neutral.
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 5:15 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: what does (en) mean?
- Replies: 23
- Views: 157
Re: what does (en) mean?
Hi! en is shorthand for ethylenediamine. The formula of this ligand is NH2CH2CH2NH2. Hope it helps.
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 5:01 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Oxidation State
- Replies: 16
- Views: 72
Re: Oxidation State
Hi! In general, the oxidation state is the charge of that atom.
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 4:58 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Naming Order
- Replies: 16
- Views: 62
Re: Naming Order
Hi! I think as long as you put the transition metal at the beginning, you should be fine. The order of ligands is not so important.
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 4:52 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: sapling 9c.3
- Replies: 4
- Views: 41
Re: sapling 9c.3
Hi! I think only the names are ordered alphabetically not including the prefixes.
- Sat Dec 05, 2020 4:45 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: sapling problem #1
- Replies: 5
- Views: 53
Re: sapling problem #1
Hi! There are two Cl in the complex ion, so it should be dichloro which has -2 negetive charges. In addition there is a cl (-1) atom outside. Given that the complex compound is neutral, Co should have +3 charges, written as Cobalt (III).
- Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:19 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: More than 6 electron densities
- Replies: 5
- Views: 41
Re: More than 6 electron densities
I believe there are hybridizations beyond sp3d2. However, I dont think we are going to use them, at least not in 14A lol.
- Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:14 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: e density
- Replies: 30
- Views: 133
Re: e density
Yes! Every bond and lone pair is considered as one region of electron density.
- Wed Nov 25, 2020 3:12 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Lecture example ethene
- Replies: 9
- Views: 87
Re: Lecture example ethene
Hi! I think ethene has sp2 orbitals instead of sp3 orbitals. C has 3 electrons in 2sp2 orbitals and 1 electron in 2p electron. Hope it helps!
- Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:58 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Sp3d or dsp3
- Replies: 22
- Views: 863
Re: Sp3d or dsp3
According to Dr. Lavelle (in his latest lecture), both are correct. :)
- Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:54 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Finding Hybridization
- Replies: 6
- Views: 28
Re: Finding Hybridization
Both bonds and lone pairs are considered as regions of electron density and thus determine the hybridization. One bond (single, double, or trible) counts as one region of electron density. So does one lone pair. I dont think there is any exception.
- Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:48 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Lone Pair E-
- Replies: 47
- Views: 263
Re: Lone Pair E-
Yes. One lone pair is considered as one region of electron density. Hope it helps :)
- Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:03 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Stable Structures
- Replies: 10
- Views: 67
Re: Stable Structures
Yes, I think we should always consider the most stable structure when determining the shapes of molecules.
- Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:01 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Sapling 2E 25
- Replies: 2
- Views: 19
Re: Sapling 2E 25
I think your answer is correct. I'm not sure why it gives another answer instead.
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 11:52 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Bond Angle
- Replies: 9
- Views: 61
Re: Bond Angle
I think the bond angle depends on the exact atoms in the molecules. We can get the actual values through experiments data.
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 11:49 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: VSEPR notation
- Replies: 9
- Views: 32
Re: VSEPR notation
Yes. I think it can tell you the shape of molecules since it represents the number of bonded atoms and lone pairs.
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 6:57 pm
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Oxidation Number
- Replies: 8
- Views: 90
Re: Oxidation Number
I think MinjooPark_3F has explained very clearly. Basically, you should memorize those oxidation numbers.
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 6:51 pm
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Sapling week 5 & 6 #5
- Replies: 20
- Views: 123
Re: Sapling week 5 & 6 #5
The formal charge of C should be -2. FC= valence electrons (4) - (long pairs (4) + sharing electrons/2 (2))
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 6:46 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Resonance
- Replies: 19
- Views: 100
Re: Resonance
I think the reason is that in resonance structures, electrons move around more (delocalized electrons), which requires less energy to stablize the structure
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 6:25 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Formal Charge
- Replies: 11
- Views: 77
Re: Formal Charge
Hi! I think you are right about getting each atom equal or close to 0 formal charge.
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 6:20 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: bond length
- Replies: 37
- Views: 152
Re: bond length
Hi, I don't think we need to calculate the actual bond length. As long as you know some characters like the longer length the weaker strength, you should be fine.
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 5:37 am
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Formal Charge
- Replies: 11
- Views: 343
Re: Formal Charge
It would be -1 then :)
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 5:30 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: lewis structure
- Replies: 10
- Views: 88
Re: lewis structure
To calculate the formal charge of each atom, you just need to use the formula formal charge = valence electrons - (shared electrons/2 + lone pairs)
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 5:22 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Lewis Structure for BrF3
- Replies: 6
- Views: 26
Re: Lewis Structure for BrF3
Hi!
I agree with what others have discussed. The answer is incorrect for having 26 electrons instead of 28 electrons.
I agree with what others have discussed. The answer is incorrect for having 26 electrons instead of 28 electrons.
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 5:17 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Sapling Weeks 5-6 HW Question 2
- Replies: 7
- Views: 63
Re: Sapling Weeks 5-6 HW Question 2
How do you know when it's best to use a double bond as opposed to using a single bond and a lone pair? I think it depends on the formal charge. It is better for atom to have 0 formal charge because it's more stable. So if a double bond can make the atom's formal charge equal to 0, then draw the dou...
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 5:11 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Sapling W 5/6 #1
- Replies: 5
- Views: 42
Re: Sapling W 5/6 #1
Hi!
I think you need to assign the formal charge when you draw the structure. It doesn't matter where you put the elements except the centreal one.
I think you need to assign the formal charge when you draw the structure. It doesn't matter where you put the elements except the centreal one.
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:50 am
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Kinetic Energy
- Replies: 10
- Views: 108
Re: Kinetic Energy
According to the equation E(photon)-work function=Kinetic energy, the work funtion is a constant. So the higher frequency, the larger energy of Photo, and thus the larger kinetic energy.
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:46 am
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Participation points
- Replies: 16
- Views: 169
Re: Participation points
Hi!
I think you should have 5 posts per week. :)
I think you should have 5 posts per week. :)
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:42 am
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Sampling HW Q4
- Replies: 5
- Views: 56
Re: Sampling HW Q4
Hi!
You should use E of photo to minus the kinetic energy of the electron (mv^2/2) in order to get the work funtion.
You should use E of photo to minus the kinetic energy of the electron (mv^2/2) in order to get the work funtion.
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 6:39 am
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Lyman Series
- Replies: 30
- Views: 199
Re: Lyman Series
Yes, if it is Lyman series n1 should be 1
- Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:59 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: 10/30 lecture
- Replies: 6
- Views: 56
Re: 10/30 lecture
The sulfate has four O atoms (6*4 electrons) so prof multiplied 4. In ammonium there are 4 H atoms, therefore he multiplied the number of electrons by 4
- Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:57 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: m vs nm
- Replies: 66
- Views: 450
Re: m vs nm
I think both are OK, unless it is stated in the question.
- Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:56 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: 1B7
- Replies: 2
- Views: 51
Re: 1B7
Hi! In part a, you get the energy emitted by an excited atom. For part b, you just need to find the number of sodium atoms in 5 mg sodium (using moalr mass of sodium and avogadro's number). Then multiply the result of part a and the number of sodium atoms.
- Thu Oct 22, 2020 9:02 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Textbook Questions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 57
Re: Textbook Questions
I just did all of them because it's said that some of midterms questions will come from the textbook. lol
- Thu Oct 22, 2020 8:55 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Electrons Emitted
- Replies: 7
- Views: 45
Re: Electrons Emitted
Hi! The number of electrons emitted is maximized when their kinetic energy equal to 0. So you just need to divide the total energy by the work funtion.
- Thu Oct 22, 2020 8:49 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Textbook question 1.A.1
- Replies: 2
- Views: 26
Textbook question 1.A.1
Hi guys!
Does anyone how the phenomenon that cathode rays pass through metal foils can support wave model of electron?
Does anyone how the phenomenon that cathode rays pass through metal foils can support wave model of electron?
- Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:48 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Post-Module Assessment #20
- Replies: 2
- Views: 47
Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Post-Module Assessment #20
Delta X is +/- 1% of the hydrogen radius, whcih is (1.01-0.99)(0.05nm). Hope it helps!
- Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:26 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: post module #14
- Replies: 5
- Views: 67
Re: post module #14
Th answer would be D, because the momentum of a sationary object is 0. The Heisenberg Indeterminacy is for moving object.
- Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:21 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Heisenberg Uncertainty Module Question
- Replies: 1
- Views: 40
Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Module Question
Hi! The delta X as mentioned in the question is +/- 1% of the hydrogen radius (2*0.01*0.05nm). To get the delta V you need to first use the equation Delta p x Delta x >= h / 4 pi to get the value of Delta P. Then plug the values in delta P = M * delta V where M is the mass of an electron. Hope it he...
- Wed Oct 14, 2020 7:08 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Sapling Week 2/3 question 4
- Replies: 9
- Views: 112
Re: Sapling Week 2/3 question 4
yea, we should use the equation E(photon) - E (energy remove e-) = E (excess), where work function is the energy remove e-. the maximum kinetic energy is E (excess). Basically, you just need to plug in the values and do the calculation. Hope it helps !
- Wed Oct 14, 2020 6:58 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Textbook Homework 1A.9
- Replies: 4
- Views: 33
Re: Textbook Homework 1A.9
Hi! i think the prefix M (mage) in this question means 10^6. Hope it helps :)
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:48 pm
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Units for Dilution Equation [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 23
- Views: 208
Re: Units for Dilution Equation [ENDORSED]
I believe the unit doesn't matter if you're just concerning about the calculation. It's ok to use milliliters for volume. However, if you are tring to solve M, the unit should be in liters. (mol/L)
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:04 pm
- Forum: Balancing Chemical Reactions
- Topic: Stoichiometric Coefficients
- Replies: 20
- Views: 147
Re: Stoichiometric Coefficients
I think it's best to always check the equation first. Usually it's quite easy to tell whether it's balanced or not.
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 8:58 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Sig Figs for elements on Periodic table
- Replies: 14
- Views: 141
Re: Sig Figs for elements on Periodic table
Hi!! I usually use 4 sig figs. It seems to be enough based on the questions I've solved.
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 8:28 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Sig Figs
- Replies: 11
- Views: 118
Re: Sig Figs
there are four sig figs: 3204.
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 8:02 pm
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: Students in different time zones [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1398