Search found 85 matches
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:19 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: bonds and energy
- Replies: 13
- Views: 59
Re: bonds and energy
Hi! When you break the bond, you need energy to do it because when a compound is bonded, it becomes more stable. To break that stability, it will require some energy. On the contrary, when you form a bond, you're causing stability which is what atoms "want" and as such, energy is released....
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:18 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: R values
- Replies: 9
- Views: 35
Re: R values
Hi! The R values differ based on the units so you need to evaluate what units are given in the problem and go off of that. It's usually the pressure unit that varies, but most of the time, you'll either be given bar or atm (since these are the SI units). I hope this helps!
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:16 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Preferred way to calculate enthalpy
- Replies: 6
- Views: 24
Re: Preferred way to calculate enthalpy
Hi! It largely depends what information you are given to work with. If you are given some other reactions, then you should use Hess's Law. However, if you're specifically given heat of formations, then you should use the third method. I hope this helps!
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:14 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Method 2 and Resonance Structures
- Replies: 2
- Views: 22
Re: Method 2 and Resonance Structures
Hi! So, I think that you just need to consider the most stable resonance structure, since that's where the compound will "spend most of its time." I'm pretty sure that for the exam, Dr. Lavelle will give us quite simple molecules so you shouldn't need to worry too much about this. I hope t...
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:12 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Standard enthalpy of formation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 27
Re: Standard enthalpy of formation
So, the first method, which is Hess's method, does not necessarily use the elements in their most stable form. The goal of Hess's method is to use the delta H from known reactions to find the delta H of an unknown reactions. However, when considering standard enthalpy of formation, it's specifically...
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 6:10 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Carbon (graphite form)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 24
Re: Carbon (graphite form)
Hi! I think the only thing you need to know about carbon (in its graphite form) is that this is the most stable form of carbon, it is a solid, and its standard heat of formation would be 0 kJ. I hope this helps!
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:05 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Sapling Week 2 - Question 5
- Replies: 1
- Views: 14
Re: Sapling Week 2 - Question 5
Hi! I've attached my work below, but basically you use the pH to work backwards for the solution to the problem. I hope this helps!
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:02 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Sapling Question #4
- Replies: 6
- Views: 47
Re: Sapling Question #4
Hi! So the set-up is weird for this problem because of the nature of the equation. The equation in this problem is PCl3 + Cl2 --> PCl5. Since PCl5 is a product and you're starting off with pressure of a product, you can only subtract from the product and add to the reactant side. Another way to thin...
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:57 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: today's lecture
- Replies: 8
- Views: 42
Re: today's lecture
Hi! If you remember from previous lectures, we were told that we could approximate and ignore -x or +x if K was less than 10^-4. In this part of the lecture, Dr. Lavelle was just referring to the fact that this is another way to know if your approximation is okay (but specifically in regards to acid...
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:55 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Textbook Problem 5I #15
- Replies: 4
- Views: 32
Re: Textbook Problem 5I #15
Hi! For this problem, you would set up an ICE box the way you normally do and solve for the equilibrium concentrations. Make sure that before you start the problem that you solve for Q to know which way the reaction will proceed. Also, make sure that when you set up your K and Q equations that you d...
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:54 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Percent ionization
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20
Re: Percent ionization
Hi! Percent ionization just refers to how much of the weak acid actually ionized in solution. The formula for this would be (conj base concentration/initial acid concentration) * 100%. One thing to note is that when the problem has acids, it's usually referred to as percent ionization, but when the ...
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 8:51 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Strong Acid and Base
- Replies: 4
- Views: 24
Re: Strong Acid and Base
Hi! So, when you have a strong acid or base, you don't need to make an ICE table because the original molarity of the acid or base will match the molarity of the H+ or OH- (depending on the compound). It's only when you're dealing with weak acids or bases that you need to actually make an ICE table....
- Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:25 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Q and K
- Replies: 46
- Views: 159
Re: Q and K
As stated above, Q is the reaction quotient at a given period of time (that is not necessarily equilibrium). K is the reaction proportion at equilibrium specifically. When Q < K, the reaction will shift towards the products. When Q > K, the reaction will shift towards the reactants. When Q = K, the ...
- Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:23 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Calculating shifts in equilibrium due to temp change
- Replies: 3
- Views: 37
Re: Calculating shifts in equilibrium due to temp change
For now, there's not a way to calculate K using only the temperature. We will learn about how to do this in the thermodynamic unit using the van't Hoff equation. For now, you just need to know how an increase or decrease in temperature would affect the shift in equilibrium. I hope this helps!
- Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:21 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: endothermic v endergonic
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10
Re: endothermic v endergonic
Endothermic is referring to heat while endergonic is referring to entropy. However, I think, for now, we only need to know about endothermic reactions and we do not need to know about endergonic. I hope this helps!
- Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:20 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Calculating Q
- Replies: 7
- Views: 30
Re: Calculating Q
Hi! I find it helpful to know what phases would appear in Qc versus Qp. In Qc, you can include gaseous and aqueous molecules. In Qp, you can only include gaseous molecules. I hope this helps!
- Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:16 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Calculating concentrations using ICE Chart
- Replies: 8
- Views: 33
Re: Calculating concentrations using ICE Chart
You can only ignore the subtraction or addition of x (the change component) when K < 10^-4. Otherwise, you will have to use the quadratic equation or solve for x because the change is actually significant. I hope this helps!
- Sat Jan 09, 2021 11:15 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Partial pressure vs. concentration
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10
Re: Partial pressure vs. concentration
Hi! In order to differentiate when you would use partial pressure versus concentration, you would need to look at what information the problem provides. If the problem provides you with concentrations or mols or if it mentions Kc, you should use concentration. If it mentions pressures or uses Kp, th...
- Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:29 am
- Forum: Identifying Acidic & Basic Salts
- Topic: Neutral Salts
- Replies: 7
- Views: 57
Re: Neutral Salts
The best way to determine it in my opinion is to play a game of mix and match as the person above said. If you have LiCl, you would make each ion an acid/base. LiOH is a strong base and HCl is a strong acid. As such, the salt would cancel out and the solution would have a pH of 7. I hope this helps!
- Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:28 am
- Forum: Air Pollution & Acid Rain
- Topic: Why does acid rain exist
- Replies: 13
- Views: 147
Re: Why does acid rain exist
Acid rain largely exists because of the effect of fossil fuels and other air pollutants. When we release these air pollutants, they react with water to create acids, which lowers the pH of the rain. Anything that reduces the production of CO2, SO2, or NO2 (which are the main pollutants) would reduce...
- Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:26 am
- Forum: Calculating the pH of Salt Solutions
- Topic: Titration Diagram
- Replies: 4
- Views: 63
Re: Titration Diagram
I believe that we don't need to know about all the different points on a titration diagram. The main thing is that you should be able to predict whether the stoichiometric point of a titration would be greater than, less than, or equal to 7 based on the acids and bases that interacted. For reference...
- Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:24 am
- Forum: Polyprotic Acids & Bases
- Topic: Defintion
- Replies: 24
- Views: 767
Re: Defintion
The main polyprotic acids that we need to know for the test are carbonic acid, sulfuric acid, and phosphoric acid. It's also important to remember that the intermediate states for any of these compounds can result in that intermediate compound acting amphoteric (having acidic and basic properties). ...
- Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:22 am
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: pH < pKa but for bases
- Replies: 3
- Views: 53
Re: pH < pKa but for bases
The way I remember this is by thinking about bases as being the opposite of acids. For acids, when pH > pKa, the acid will deprotonate. However, for bases, when pH > pKa, the base usually stays the way it is because that is the way that pH stays greater. The same principle applies for the other way ...
- Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:21 am
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: 6.B.5.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 23
Re: 6.B.5.
Hi! Just as a tip, it helps a lot to remember the number 14 when doing anything relating to pH. pH + pOH = 14 and [H+] * [OH-] is equal to 10^-14. I hope this helps a little!
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:34 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: HClO3 Strength for 14A
- Replies: 3
- Views: 41
Re: HClO3 Strength for 14A
HClO3 is a strong acid, which means that it will dissociate easily in water. I hope this helps!
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:33 pm
- Forum: Acidity & Basicity Constants and The Conjugate Seesaw
- Topic: Equilibrium constant
- Replies: 5
- Views: 24
Re: Equilibrium constant
The equilibrium constant essentially represents the ratio of the rates at which the forwards and backwards reaction are happening. It also represents the concentrations of the products and reactants. Hope this helps!
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:32 pm
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: [H3O+] vs [H+]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 22
Re: [H3O+] vs [H+]
Hi! Just keep in mind that H+ is more of a shorthand for what is actually happening. H3O+ represents the ion in the reaction that is actually happens, which symbolizes that H2O gets an H+ ion. Hope this helps!
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:30 pm
- Forum: Amphoteric Compounds
- Topic: Amphoteric
- Replies: 11
- Views: 207
Re: Amphoteric
When remembering the difference between amphoteric and amphiprotic, think of the roots in each word. Amphiprotic contains the root "prot" which is similar to proton. As such, an amphiprotic compound can donate and accept protons. An amphoteric compound can act as a base or an acid.
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:28 pm
- Forum: Amphoteric Compounds
- Topic: 6A 17
- Replies: 4
- Views: 54
Re: 6A 17
The best way to find the answer to this is to look at the periodic table that Dr. Lavelle mentioned today in class. Metal oxides will form strong bases and nonmetal oxides will form strong acids. Anything that is not a metal oxide or a nonmetal oxide is likely an amphoteric compound.
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:26 pm
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: HF in Water
- Replies: 3
- Views: 38
Re: HF in Water
As stated previously, you have to keep in mind the easiness of the acid to break in water. HCl is a stronger acid than HF, so it breaks easier in water. It could theoretically still form a coordinate covalent bond, but it would not form as easily. Hope this helps!
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:24 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: oxidation number
- Replies: 3
- Views: 35
Re: oxidation number
Hi! The overall charge for this molecule is -2. As such, all the oxidations states need to add up to -2. The chlorine in this case has an oxidation state of -1. As such, -1 * 6 is -6. Through the addition, we can find that Platinum has an oxidation state of +4.
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 9:22 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Polydentate
- Replies: 8
- Views: 58
Re: Polydentate
I find that drawing the Lewis structure helps me find out if a molecule is a polydentate. If more than one of the atoms on the molecule has a lone pair of electrons, then it is likely a polydentate. I hope this helps!
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:23 am
- Forum: *Molecular Orbital Theory (Bond Order, Diamagnetism, Paramagnetism)
- Topic: Ligands
- Replies: 9
- Views: 106
Re: Ligands
You can identify the number of ligands by thinking about the coordination sphere and the coordination number of the compound (which is the amount of bonds to the central atom). Hope this helps!
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:21 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: e density
- Replies: 30
- Views: 140
Re: e density
A bonding area and a region with a lone pair are considered regions of electron density. Moreover, keep in mind that having a single bond versus having a triple bond doesn't change whether an area is a region of electron density. Hope this helps!
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:18 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Hybridization Explanation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 73
Re: Hybridization Explanation
Hybridization helps provide low energy levels and it also is a more realistic explanation of the probability of actually finding an electron in a certain orbital. Hope this helps!
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:17 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Textbook 2F.15 Question
- Replies: 2
- Views: 16
Re: Textbook 2F.15 Question
When you compare molecules with sp3 hybridized orbitals with sp2 hybridized orbitals, it is apparent that the sp2 orbitals have more s characteristics because as the amount of p characteristic decreases, the amount of s characteristic increases. We can also see that as the s characteristic increases...
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:14 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Textbook 2E.11b
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9
Re: Textbook 2E.11b
The formula for iodine trichloride is ICl(3). As such, the total amount of electrons would be 7 + 3(7) = 28 electrons. The Lewis structure would involve the three chlorines being bonded to the iodine and the iodine having two lone pairs, making it a T-shape geometry. Hope this helps!
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:12 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Sapling #3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 52
Re: Sapling #3
The shape of this molecule is AX(2)E. This is the Bent geometry. When a molecule is Bent, it has an angle of 120 degrees. As such, the smallest bond angle would be 120 degrees. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:44 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Bond Angles (<109 or 104.5, etc)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 56
Re: Bond Angles (<109 or 104.5, etc)
I think that for trigonal pyramidal, you just need to remember that the bond angle will be slightly less than 109.5 degrees but the exact measurement varies depending on the molecule. I don't think Lavelle expects us to know the exact bond angles. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:42 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: sapling q 5
- Replies: 4
- Views: 48
Re: sapling q 5
When you think of axial atoms, associate that with the "axes", meaning that those atoms are around a pole that goes through the central atom. The equatorial atoms are ones that "surround" the central atom in a sense. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:41 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Equatorial plane
- Replies: 2
- Views: 28
Re: Equatorial plane
The lone pair on the equatorial plane is closer to the atoms so it will have a greater repulsion from the atoms. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:39 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Shape Names
- Replies: 50
- Views: 299
Re: Shape Names
To whoever asked, typically when you have two lone pairs, you do try to place them far away from each other as lone pairs repel each other. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:38 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Lone pairs and 180 degrees
- Replies: 1
- Views: 24
Re: Lone pairs and 180 degrees
Part A of the problem features a central atom with two atoms bonded to it at 120 degree angle. Because of the angle, we know that there must be at least one lone pair of electrons here. For part B, there still could be two lone pairs on the central atom which would balance each other out because the...
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:04 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Rules for Assigning Shape
- Replies: 6
- Views: 61
Re: Rules for Assigning Shape
Hi! When assigning shape, the main things that you should take into consideration are the bonding pairs and the lone pairs that surround the central atom. Think of the bond angles as a "result" of the shape, not something that causes the shape. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:03 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Repulsion
- Replies: 9
- Views: 75
Re: Repulsion
Bonding pairs are really stable because two molecules are being connected. However, when you have lone pairs, imagine two electrons floating around and being repulsed from one another. Have two of those pairs and the repulsion becomes even stronger. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 6:02 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: VSEPR
- Replies: 11
- Views: 93
Re: VSEPR
Yes! The VSEPR model helps show the shape and structure and by doing so, shows you the polarity of the model. One of the examples was the octahedral model that Lavelle talked about in lecture today!
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:55 pm
- Forum: Interionic and Intermolecular Forces (Ion-Ion, Ion-Dipole, Dipole-Dipole, Dipole-Induced Dipole, Dispersion/Induced Dipole-Induced Dipole/London Forces, Hydrogen Bonding)
- Topic: Textbook 3F.3
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10
Re: Textbook 3F.3
For this problem, I would recommend drawing out the Lewis structures for each molecule and seeing how everything balances out. If the molecule is polar, it is likely that there will be dipole-dipole interactions. If the molecule is nonpolar, there probably will be no significant dipole-dipole intera...
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:54 pm
- Forum: Interionic and Intermolecular Forces (Ion-Ion, Ion-Dipole, Dipole-Dipole, Dipole-Induced Dipole, Dispersion/Induced Dipole-Induced Dipole/London Forces, Hydrogen Bonding)
- Topic: Helpful Summary of What Induced Dipole- Induced Dipole depends on
- Replies: 6
- Views: 73
Re: Helpful Summary of What Induced Dipole- Induced Dipole depends on
The fluctuations in a nonpolar molecule are caused by van der Waal forces, rather than dipole-dipole forces. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:47 pm
- Forum: Interionic and Intermolecular Forces (Ion-Ion, Ion-Dipole, Dipole-Dipole, Dipole-Induced Dipole, Dispersion/Induced Dipole-Induced Dipole/London Forces, Hydrogen Bonding)
- Topic: H-F H-F Hydrogen Bonding vs Dipole-Dipole
- Replies: 11
- Views: 83
Re: H-F H-F Hydrogen Bonding vs Dipole-Dipole
You're right when you say that hydrogen bonding is involved here. However, I believe that Dr. Lavelle was just referring to the fact that H-F has both dipole-dipole interactions and hydrogen bonding. Both have separate energies. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 9:31 am
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Coulombs equation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 132
Re: Coulombs equation
To put it concisely, Coulomb's equation gives you the relationship between electrostatic charge and radius (or distance) between ions. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 9:30 am
- Forum: Sigma & Pi Bonds
- Topic: sigma and pi bonds
- Replies: 27
- Views: 598
Re: sigma and pi bonds
Just to clarify what has been said above, single bonds consist of one sigma bond. Double bonds consist of one sigma bond and one pi bond. And triple bonds consist of one sigma bond and two pi bonds. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 9:28 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: periodic table
- Replies: 16
- Views: 128
Re: periodic table
The way that I remember this is that atomic radius is the only one that decreases across a period and increases down a group. The rest of the trends (electronegativity, electron affinity, etc.) all increase across a period and decrease down a group. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 9:27 am
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: Identifying Radicals
- Replies: 24
- Views: 176
Re: Identifying Radicals
This was actually really helpful for me, because I didn't quite understand what a radical was. My follow up question is whether any element can be a radical or if only a certain group are radicals.
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 9:26 am
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: Expanded Octate
- Replies: 4
- Views: 37
Re: Expanded Octate
Typically, elements in the d block form ionic bonds, because they are metals. So, they don't usually have expanded octets. The main elements that have expanded octets are phosphorus, sulfur, and chlorine. Hope this helps!
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 9:24 am
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Formal Charge Equation
- Replies: 16
- Views: 72
Re: Formal Charge Equation
L refers to the number of lone pair electrons that an atom has. Make sure to count the electrons and not just the number of pairs. For instance, if oxygen had 3 lone pairs, L would be 6. Hope this helps!
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:37 am
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Ionization Energy v. Work Function
- Replies: 3
- Views: 32
Re: Ionization Energy v. Work Function
Hi! So, the reason for this is because when you try to remove an electron forcibly from an atom, you're removing it from its valence shell and it's difficult to remove it. When you look at the work function, you're typically referring to metals that have a lattice electron structure which is easier ...
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:34 am
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: Nodal Plane Importance
- Replies: 9
- Views: 50
Re: Nodal Plane Importance
The nodal plane is the place where there is the zero probability density. To put it another way, the nodal plane is the place where you cannot find any electrons. Knowing where the nodal planes are helps us zone in on the location of electrons. Hope this helps!
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:32 am
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Exceptions in Electron Configurations: Filling out Half/Full d-shell
- Replies: 4
- Views: 40
Re: Exceptions in Electron Configurations: Filling out Half/Full d-shell
HI! So, the reason that this doesn't happen is because then the s orbital would be empty and the d orbital would be full. Although this sounds good, it doesn't make sense for the s orbital to be empty as this breaks the rule of filling up lower energy shells first. Hope this helps!
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:29 am
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: 1E 25
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14
Re: 1E 25
Keep in mind that the valence electrons are the ones on the outermost shell. This helps differentiate between the valence shell configuration and electron configuration. Hope this helps!
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:27 am
- Forum: Quantum Numbers and The H-Atom
- Topic: ml values for d-orbitals
- Replies: 3
- Views: 43
Re: ml values for d-orbitals
Hi! So, you're correct when you say that the value of l will determine the possible values of ml. However, keep in mind that the value of l determines the orbitals, whereas the value(s) of ml determines the orbitals of the subshell (which is the orientation). You don't actually need to know the shap...
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:24 am
- Forum: Quantum Numbers and The H-Atom
- Topic: quantum number 4
- Replies: 6
- Views: 68
Re: quantum number 4
The 4th quantum number shows us the spin of the electron. Using the 4th quantum number, we can determine the magnetic field of the electron and it shows us which "way" the electron is going, to put it simply.
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 11:00 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Showing Work for Heisenberg Indeterminacy Equation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 30
Re: Showing Work for Heisenberg Indeterminacy Equation
You should generally use an inequality symbol because the uncertainty of the position, momentum, or velocity is always equal to or greater than whatever you calculate it to be. Hope this helps!
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:57 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Calculating Delta P
- Replies: 3
- Views: 42
Re: Calculating Delta P
It largely depends on what the question is asking. In the lecture, Dr. Lavelle found the uncertainty of the velocity to prove a point and show why that model was incorrect. In some instances, the problem may just ask for uncertainty of position and in other instances, it may ask for uncertainty of v...
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:56 am
- Forum: *Shrodinger Equation
- Topic: Schrodinger for exam
- Replies: 20
- Views: 445
Re: Schrodinger for exam
Dr. Lavelle just talked about it in his lecture! You don't need to know the actual equation, but you just need to understand it conceptually. You also need to understand how Schrodinger's equation links to orbitals. Hope this helps!
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:54 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Rutherford's Experiment
- Replies: 2
- Views: 33
Re: Rutherford's Experiment
It's also important to note that JJ Thompson came up with the plum pudding model, whereas Rutherford came up with the idea that most of the mass in an atom was in the center of the atom and concentrated on what became the nucleus. Hope this helps!
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:15 am
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Homework Problem 7 Sapling
- Replies: 2
- Views: 47
Re: Homework Problem 7 Sapling
You got the wavelength right, so what you should do is take the frequency that you are given and calculate the wavelength from the frequency using c = (wavelength)(frequency). From there, you compare the two values for wavelengths and if they are not equal, you can determine that it's not due to the...
- Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:57 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: post module #14
- Replies: 5
- Views: 67
Re: post module #14
Keep in mind that if something is stationary, then it's really easy to find its momentum and position, even if it is small. As such, the particles need to be moving, so the answer is D. Hope this helps!
- Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:53 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Discussion 2D Question 2
- Replies: 3
- Views: 54
Re: Discussion 2D Question 2
Hi! When a photon hits a metal, it interacts with exactly one electron and if the energy of the photon is high enough, it will eject an electron from the metal. As more photons come in, those photons can also interact with electrons. Essentially, one photon will put all its energy into one electron,...
- Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:51 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: What exactly is Φ?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 153
Re: What exactly is Φ?
I think the most important thing that you need to remember about the work function is that it represents the threshold energy. The amount of energy that the photon comes in with minus the threshold energy gives you the kinetic energy of the ejected electron. Hope this helps!
- Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:37 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Quanta and Photons
- Replies: 19
- Views: 172
Re: Quanta and Photons
Hi! Think of it like this. If you have water that is pouring into a bucket on a scale, that stream of water that is pouring will look constant and the scale will increase steadily. If you slow down the stream of water, the stream of water will still be constant and the scale will still increase stea...
- Mon Oct 12, 2020 10:21 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Lyman, Balmer, Paschen, Brackett Series
- Replies: 3
- Views: 60
Re: Lyman, Balmer, Paschen, Brackett Series
It's also important to note that each element has its own unique "fingerprint" of lines. For instance, Hydrogen has the Balmer and Lyman series, but only Hydrogen has these. Carbon, Oxygen, and other elements will have their own lines so keep that in mind. Hope this helps!
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 11:07 am
- Forum: Limiting Reactant Calculations
- Topic: Textbook problem M5?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 99
Re: Textbook problem M5?
I've attached my work, but in essence, once you find the limiting reactant, you can translate the amount of limiting reactant that is used into how much product would be produced from that limiting reactant. Once you find the amount of product, you can translate it back into moles of BrF3 (the exces...
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:57 am
- Forum: Balancing Chemical Reactions
- Topic: Law of Conservation with Exothermic/Endothermic Reactions
- Replies: 11
- Views: 131
Re: Law of Conservation with Exothermic/Endothermic Reactions
Heat doesn't factor into the aspect of mass. Mass can only be found when a compound is in one of the four states of matter (solid, liquid, gas or aqueous). Involving heat as a part of mass starts to go into the realm of nuclear reactions, which we're not doing right now. Hope that helps!
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:55 am
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Balancing Chemical Equations
- Replies: 12
- Views: 151
Re: Balancing Chemical Equations
When you balance an equation, you do sometimes end up having coefficients that are all divisible by a common number. If you are able to divide it, you should because it's really only considered proper if all of the coefficients are properly reduced.
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:54 am
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Empirical VS Molecular
- Replies: 10
- Views: 122
Re: Empirical VS Molecular
The empirical formula helps identify a starting point and it can help you find the molecular formula from the mass percentage composition. It can also help you see how different molecules may be related to each other.
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:53 am
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: VInitial and VFinal
- Replies: 13
- Views: 146
Re: VInitial and VFinal
This formula is basically used for every problem relating to dilution. If you have three of those components, you can find out the last one. Hope this helps!
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:51 am
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Empirical VS Molecular
- Replies: 10
- Views: 122
Re: Empirical VS Molecular
Its also important to note that the molecular formula can sometimes be the same as the empirical formula. However, the molecular formula must always be either the same as the empirical formula or a multiple of the empirical formula.
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:49 am
- Forum: Accuracy, Precision, Mole, Other Definitions
- Topic: Accuracy vs Precision
- Replies: 20
- Views: 212
Re: Accuracy vs Precision
Measuring tools usually have the aspect of precision because it represents how close to the actual answer the measurement will be. It shows how close together the results will be, which makes sense according to the definition of precision.
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:47 am
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Mol VS Mole
- Replies: 17
- Views: 213
Re: Mol VS Mole
They're the same thing! Mol is just an abbreviation of mole.
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:45 am
- Forum: Accuracy, Precision, Mole, Other Definitions
- Topic: Accuracy vs Precision
- Replies: 20
- Views: 212
Re: Accuracy vs Precision
This is super helpful! Thank you!
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:38 am
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Week 1 Sapling HW Chem 14A Problem 9
- Replies: 8
- Views: 178
Re: Week 1 Sapling HW Chem 14A Problem 9
You should assume that the molar mass is 110 grams/mol. The + and -10 doesn't really matter too much!
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:25 am
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Dilutions
- Replies: 10
- Views: 111
Re: Dilutions
When doing a dilution, you usually pour more water in or pour a more concentrated solution in. You don't usually pour more solute in. For instance, if I had a bowl with 10 blueberries and 10 strawberries, I could reduce the ratio of blueberries by putting more strawberries. I didn't change the amoun...
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 10:23 am
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Molarity Example from Lecture 10/5 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 115
Re: Molarity Example from Lecture 10/5 [ENDORSED]
To solve this problem, you should use the equation M1V1 = M2V2. So, (0.0380 M)(x mL) = (0.00150 M)(250 mL) and from there, you solve for x. The moles of the solute doesn't change, because when you are diluting or concentrating, you change the volume of the solution by pouring more solution or pourin...
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:33 am
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: G21
- Replies: 2
- Views: 84
Re: G21
I attached my work for the problem. But, you need to be able to find the total moles of the ion you're looking for and divide it by the total volume to find the answer for each part. For instance, since each molecule has potassium in it, you would convert the grams of each product into moles of pota...
- Mon Oct 05, 2020 9:23 am
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Significant Figures In A Given Weight
- Replies: 11
- Views: 186
Re: Significant Figures In A Given Weight
Make sure that you acknowledge exactly what the "7" is listed as in the problem. If it just says 7, then that's one significant figure, but if it says 7.00 that would be three significant figures. Hope this helps!