YuditGaribay3J wrote:So when we are looking at oxidizing agents it is just the opposites of what we think it is. So normally I think of oxidizing as losing but it is actually gaining? and vise versa?
If you put it that way then yes.
YuditGaribay3J wrote:So when we are looking at oxidizing agents it is just the opposites of what we think it is. So normally I think of oxidizing as losing but it is actually gaining? and vise versa?
Kamille Kibria 2A wrote:im not sure if this diagram helps but this is what I did. you just add up the reverse delta H and activation of the forward reaction. we have different numbers but it's still the same concept
Arya Adibi 1K wrote:As stated by Chem_Mod, Whenever a conducting electrode is needed, use Pt.
You would need a conducting electrode whenever either the reactants or products are aqueous and don't have a solid conductor.
LeanneBagood_2F wrote:wait what exactly are bomb calorimeters? has this mentioned in lecture before? if so, when/where and how solid should we be on this topic?
Heather Costa 2C wrote:wait actually it just used to help find the temperature when it is unknown?
LeanneBagood_2E wrote:What about when you're presented with the names+prefixes already and you have to find the opposite?
Like, does the order you write the ligands/formulas in the square brackets matter?