Search found 102 matches
- Fri Mar 12, 2021 11:10 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: Sapling #13 W10
- Replies: 2
- Views: 189
Re: Sapling #13 W10
In this case it is included because it is part of the reverse reaction from the first step that is being used to create the rate law you need. You would included it even though it is an intermediate.
- Fri Mar 12, 2021 11:08 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: Sapling 20
- Replies: 5
- Views: 362
Re: Sapling 20
I agree, you need to use the Arrhenius equation for this problem. Do it for the catalyzed and uncatalyzed reactions by dividing them, and you'll notice that A cancels out for both. From there just plug in the needed values and solve (remember to watch the units, as R is in J and the given values are...
- Fri Mar 12, 2021 10:59 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Oxidation Numbers: Provided or memorize?
- Replies: 26
- Views: 2206
Re: Oxidation Numbers: Provided or memorize?
Like people said, if you know the general rules about elements like O and H, you can usually figure out the other oxidation numbers from there.
- Fri Mar 12, 2021 10:56 pm
- Forum: Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts
- Topic: Are catalysts consumed?
- Replies: 37
- Views: 2067
Re: Are catalysts consumed?
Can someone explain how when we're given multiple steps whether to tell the difference between what's an intermediate and what is a catalyst? I feel like a catalyst would be present in the fast step because that's what makes it fast and we would see it also in the product but I don't know if this i...
- Fri Mar 12, 2021 10:51 pm
- Forum: Zero Order Reactions
- Topic: Overall reaction order
- Replies: 22
- Views: 1230
Re: Overall reaction order
It is rare, but theoretically yes. All of the reactants would have to be zero order for this to occur.
- Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:37 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: Rate Laws and Elementary Steps
- Replies: 4
- Views: 284
Re: Rate Laws and Elementary Steps
Hi, I agree with what you're thinking. The rate laws come from the balanced reactions and the stoichiometric coefficients, but just remember that intermediates are not included in the rate law itself.
- Sun Mar 07, 2021 3:19 pm
- Forum: Method of Initial Rates (To Determine n and k)
- Topic: Concept of Order (n)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 499
Re: Concept of Order (n)
Mari Williams 1K wrote:Is the order of the reaction referring to the total sum of the order of the reactants?
The overall order of the reaction is the sum of the orders of each of the reactants in your rate law.
- Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:42 pm
- Forum: Method of Initial Rates (To Determine n and k)
- Topic: graphs and order
- Replies: 19
- Views: 971
Re: graphs and order
The zero order graphs are linear with the given data, [A] vs. Time. First order graphs come when ln[A] is plotted vs. time and gives a straight line. Second order graphs come when 1/[A] is plotted vs. time and gives a straight line.
- Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:40 pm
- Forum: General Rate Laws
- Topic: Derivation of integrated rate laws and half-life equations
- Replies: 7
- Views: 397
Re: Derivation of integrated rate laws and half-life equations
Knowing the laws and half-life equations is good but memorizing how they are derived is not as important, just having an understanding of how they were derived is good.
- Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:35 pm
- Forum: Kinetics vs. Thermodynamics Controlling a Reaction
- Topic: kinetics vs. thermodynamics
- Replies: 23
- Views: 1341
Re: kinetics vs. thermodynamics
Thermodynamics is primarily concerned with stability of a reaction, but kinetics is concerned with the rate of the reaction.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 5:26 pm
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: Which Nesnst Equation
- Replies: 25
- Views: 1294
Re: Which Nesnst Equation
The log equation is used when you are at 298 K (25 C). Otherwise, use the ln equation because it has the variable for temperature in it.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 5:24 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Anode/Cathode
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1802
Re: Anode/Cathode
The anode must go on the left and the cathode must go on the right so that it is consistent when you see how the electrons are flowing.
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 3:17 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: E° vs. E and G° vs. G
- Replies: 25
- Views: 1131
Re: E° vs. E and G° vs. G
I'm seeing both 273.15 K and 298 K on this thread for standard temperature. I thought that it was 298 K (25 degrees celsius), but could someone please clarify which one it is? The temperature at STP is 273.15 K (0 C) and the temperature at SATP is 298 K (25 C). Standard conditions for delta G naugh...
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 1:48 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Sapling Week 7/8 #19
- Replies: 3
- Views: 290
Re: Sapling Week 7/8 #19
Okay great, thanks!
- Sun Feb 28, 2021 12:13 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Sapling Week 7/8 #19
- Replies: 3
- Views: 290
Sapling Week 7/8 #19
Calculate the standard potential, E∘, for this reaction from its ΔG∘ value.
X(s)+Y2+(aq)⟶X2+(aq)+Y(s)ΔG∘=63.0 kJ
Which equation would we use for this problem?
X(s)+Y2+(aq)⟶X2+(aq)+Y(s)ΔG∘=63.0 kJ
Which equation would we use for this problem?
- Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:44 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Sapling Week 7/8 #2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 353
Re: Sapling Week 7/8 #2
That makes more sense, thank you!
- Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:49 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Sapling Week 7/8 #2
- Replies: 6
- Views: 353
Sapling Week 7/8 #2
Write a balanced overall reaction from these unbalanced half-reactions.
In⟶In3+
Cd2+⟶Cd
I tried this problem by adding electrons but didn't get the right answer, how would you add the electrons to find the overall reaction?
In⟶In3+
Cd2+⟶Cd
I tried this problem by adding electrons but didn't get the right answer, how would you add the electrons to find the overall reaction?
- Sun Feb 21, 2021 4:46 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Anode and Cathode
- Replies: 11
- Views: 598
Re: Anode and Cathode
The anode is always the oxidized side because that is where the electrons are leaving for the reduced side.
- Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:19 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: State function?
- Replies: 36
- Views: 1663
Re: State function?
E is not a state function because you need to know the path taken. You cannot just figure it out from the final state to the initial, you need to know the process.
- Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:12 pm
- Forum: Van't Hoff Equation
- Topic: Vant Hoff's equation
- Replies: 7
- Views: 535
Re: Vant Hoff's equation
You would also need to know the two temperatures and the equilibrium constants themselves (depending on the version you are using). Knowing delta H would also be useful.
- Sun Feb 14, 2021 6:06 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Sapling 5/6 #19
- Replies: 4
- Views: 308
Re: Sapling 5/6 #19
Okay, I think it was the units messing me up, thanks!
- Sun Feb 14, 2021 3:08 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Sapling 5/6 #19
- Replies: 4
- Views: 308
Sapling 5/6 #19
For a gaseous reaction, standard conditions are 298 K and a partial pressure of 1 bar for all species. For the reaction N2(g)+3H2(g)↽−−⇀2NH3(g) the standard change in Gibbs free energy is ΔG∘=−69.0 kJ/mol. What is ΔG for this reaction at 298 K when the partial pressures are PN2=0.400 bar, PH2=0.350 ...
- Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:29 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Sapling 5/6 #7
- Replies: 4
- Views: 259
Re: Sapling 5/6 #7
That makes sense, thank you guys!
- Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:22 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Sapling 5/6 #7
- Replies: 4
- Views: 259
Sapling 5/6 #7
Hi, I am having some trouble finding delta H for this problem, which equation would I use for that?
- Sun Feb 14, 2021 1:14 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: sapling week 5/6 assignment #15
- Replies: 6
- Views: 463
Re: sapling week 5/6 assignment #15
Like people said above, the best way is to approach it as a Hess-like situation. You need to manipulate the reactions so that you can cancel things out to get the final result. Just remember that any changes you make there should be reflected in the delta H and delta S values before you plug them in...
- Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:11 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using First Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Sapling #19
- Replies: 6
- Views: 347
Re: Sapling #19
Okay, just wanted to make sure, thank you!
- Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:02 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using First Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Sapling #19
- Replies: 6
- Views: 347
Sapling #19
A constant‑volume calorimeter was calibrated by carrying out a reaction known to release 1.32 kJ of heat in 0.600 L of solution in the calorimeter (q=−1.32 kJ) , resulting in a temperature rise of 2.18 C . In a subsequent experiment, 300.0 mL of 0.40 M HClO2(aq) and 300.0 mL of 0.40 M NaOH(aq) were ...
- Sun Feb 07, 2021 4:49 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Sapling #14
- Replies: 4
- Views: 292
Re: Sapling #14
Okay that makes sense, thanks!
- Sun Feb 07, 2021 4:44 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Sapling #14
- Replies: 4
- Views: 292
Sapling #14
A sample of an ideal gas in a cylinder of volume 3.84 L at 298 K and 2.10 atm expands to 8.65 L by two different pathways. Path A is an isothermal, reversible expansion. Path B has two steps. In the first step, the gas is cooled at constant volume to 1.07 atm . In the second step, the gas is heated ...
- Sun Feb 07, 2021 12:03 am
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Work on a system
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1297
Re: Work on a system
Compression is the easiest example for me to remember when it comes to a positive work value because the work is going into the system.
- Sun Jan 31, 2021 2:25 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Sapling #12
- Replies: 2
- Views: 90
Sapling #12
At constant volume, the heat of combustion of a particular compound, compound A, is −3931.0 kJ/mol. When 1.157 g of compound A (molar mass =120.61 g/mol) is burned in a bomb calorimeter, the temperature of the calorimeter (including its contents) rose by 6.587 ∘C. What is the heat capacity (calorime...
- Sun Jan 31, 2021 2:13 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Endothermic v. Exothermic
- Replies: 139
- Views: 19459
Re: Endothermic v. Exothermic
Endothermic reactions will always be positive because they require heat to occur, and exothermic reactions will always be negative because they release heat and therefore lose energy.
- Sun Jan 31, 2021 2:10 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Exothermic vs Extothermic
- Replies: 13
- Views: 473
Re: Exothermic vs Extothermic
If the surroundings are getting warmer, the reaction is exothermic because it is releasing heat into the system. If they are getting colder, it is endothermic because heat is being absorbed from the system.
- Sun Jan 31, 2021 2:08 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Standard Enthalpies of Formation using Hess's Law
- Replies: 18
- Views: 1224
Re: Standard Enthalpies of Formation using Hess's Law
You can arrange the reactions any way you want, just remember to make the necessary changes to the delta H values.
- Sun Jan 31, 2021 2:07 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: when to assume x is insignificant
- Replies: 86
- Views: 9873
Re: when to assume x is insignificant
If K it is less than 10^-3 you can assume, but to be safe it is better to approximate if K is less than 10^-4.
- Sun Jan 24, 2021 3:41 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Inverse Kc [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 41
- Views: 2682
Re: Inverse Kc [ENDORSED]
You would use the inverse when you are dealing with the reverse reaction.
- Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:13 pm
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: Sapling Week 2 #5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 342
Re: Sapling Week 2 #5
That makes sense, thanks!
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 2:23 pm
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: Sapling Week 2 #5
- Replies: 3
- Views: 342
Sapling Week 2 #5
The Kb for an amine is 9.365×10−5. What percentage of the amine is protonated if the pH of a solution of the amine is 9.570 ? Assume that all OH− came from the reaction of B with H2O. Hi, I found the concentration of [OH-] but I cannot get the right percentage, how do I find the correct percentage p...
- Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:49 pm
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: Sapling #2
- Replies: 7
- Views: 532
Re: Sapling #2
That makes sense, thank you!
- Wed Jan 20, 2021 5:38 pm
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: Sapling #2
- Replies: 7
- Views: 532
Sapling #2
The Ka of a monoprotic weak acid is 0.00362. What is the percent ionization of a 0.142 M solution of this acid?
Hi, is this one of the instances where you can disregard the x in 0.142-x (from the ICE table) when working with the Ka equation?
Hi, is this one of the instances where you can disregard the x in 0.142-x (from the ICE table) when working with the Ka equation?
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:13 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Strong vs Weak Acids and Bases
- Replies: 7
- Views: 321
Re: Strong vs Weak Acids and Bases
Memorizing the strong acids and bases is the best bet because then you can easily identify which ones are weak acids and bases during an exam.
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:11 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Using the ICE table
- Replies: 36
- Views: 1620
Re: Using the ICE table
Hi, ICE tables are applicable when working with both concentration (Kc) and pressure (Kp).
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:08 am
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Kelvin or Celsius?
- Replies: 86
- Views: 6665
Re: Kelvin or Celsius?
Hi, you would use Kelvin and make sure to convert from other units like Celsius.
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:07 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: hw question #9
- Replies: 6
- Views: 175
Re: hw question #9
Hi, you would use 0.700 M for [NO] because you are trying to find the concentrations when equilibrium is reestablished after making 0.700 the amount, so you wouldn't want to use the first value given.
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:00 am
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Sampling hw #4
- Replies: 16
- Views: 1843
Re: Sampling hw #4
Kaleb Tuliau 3E wrote:So total pressure is all of our equilibrium pressures combined?
Yes, the total pressure is all of the equilibrium pressures (found in the last row of the ICE table) combined!
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:42 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: K vs. Q
- Replies: 53
- Views: 2694
Re: K vs. Q
Yes, Q and K are both the same process of using the ratio of products to reactants. The only difference is that Q is when the reaction is not at equilibrium.
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:34 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: I in ICE Chart
- Replies: 11
- Views: 538
Re: I in ICE Chart
Yes, if you are given the initial concentration for a reverse reaction, the products would not equal 0.
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:29 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Confusion with terms
- Replies: 9
- Views: 421
Re: Confusion with terms
Yes, these terms all mean the same thing in describing that formation of the products is favored, and I agree that thinking of it in the other terms besides "shifting" is easiest for me to remember.
- Fri Jan 08, 2021 3:26 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Sapling #3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 213
Re: Sapling #3
That makes sense, thank you!
- Fri Jan 08, 2021 1:54 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Sapling #3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 213
Sapling #3
At a certain temperature, the equilibrium constant, Kc, for this reaction is 53.3. H2(g)+I2(g)↽−−⇀2HI(g) Kc=53.3 At this temperature, 0.300 mol H2 and 0.300 mol I2 were placed in a 1.00 L container to react. What concentration of HI is present at equilibrium? Hi, how would you solve the ICE table fo...
- Sat Dec 12, 2020 12:26 pm
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: Bookwork 6B #3
- Replies: 6
- Views: 212
Re: Bookwork 6B #3
Hi, in general for these calculations you should convert from mL to L because Liters is the unit used in the formula itself.
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 2:22 pm
- Forum: Identifying Acidic & Basic Salts
- Topic: TB J17
- Replies: 1
- Views: 123
TB J17
In each of the following salts, either the cation or the anion is a weak acid or a weak base in water. Write the chemical equation for the proton transfer reaction of this cation or anion with water: (a) NaC6H5O; (b) KClO; (c) C5H5NHCl; (d) NH4Br. Hi, I looked at the answers in the textbook but I am...
- Thu Dec 10, 2020 10:50 pm
- Forum: Acidity & Basicity Constants and The Conjugate Seesaw
- Topic: Sapling Question 13
- Replies: 4
- Views: 324
Re: Sapling Question 13
That helps tons, thank you!
- Thu Dec 10, 2020 10:07 pm
- Forum: Acidity & Basicity Constants and The Conjugate Seesaw
- Topic: Sapling Question 13
- Replies: 4
- Views: 324
Sapling Question 13
A monoprotic weak acid, HA , is ionized according to the reaction HA(aq) + H2O(l) ↽−−⇀ A−(aq) + H3O + (aq) pKa=3.78 where A− is the conjugate base to HA. For this weak monoprotic acid, the predominant species present at pH 6.49 is: neutral. charged. unknown. Hi, how would I go about solving this pro...
- Thu Dec 10, 2020 9:43 pm
- Forum: Lewis Acids & Bases
- Topic: Lewis vs Bronsted Definition
- Replies: 7
- Views: 479
Re: Lewis vs Bronsted Definition
The easiest way to know is just to remember that Bronsted is dealing with protons, while Lewis is dealing with electrons. It helps me to think back to Lewis structures, because we focused on the electrons during that topic, so that relates to the focus on electrons here.
- Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:38 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: TB 9C #5
- Replies: 2
- Views: 99
Re: TB 9C #5
That makes sense, thank you!
- Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:07 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Naming Compounds-Outside of the Brackets
- Replies: 8
- Views: 468
Re: Naming Compounds-Outside of the Brackets
Hi, I agree that you just use a space. You only attach the things that are inside the brackets into one word, and you put the stuff outside the brackets into separate words that are either before or after the compound, based on where they are in relation to the brackets.
- Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:05 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: Coordination Number
- Replies: 8
- Views: 479
Re: Coordination Number
Hi, coordination number is the number of ligands attached to the transition metal. It is easiest to look at the number of ligands inside the brackets.
- Thu Dec 03, 2020 7:58 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: TB 9C #5
- Replies: 2
- Views: 99
TB 9C #5
Which of the following ligands can be polydentate? If the ligand can be polydentate, give the maximum number of places on the ligand that can bind simultaneously to a single metal center: (a) HN(CH2CH2NH2)2; (b) CO32−; (c) H2O; (d) oxalate. Hi, what is the easiest way to figure out which of these ar...
Re: Sapling 1
Hi, naming the compounds like that follows alphabetical order without the prefixes included. You only add in the prefixes after you have determined the order of the ligand names themselves.
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 10:21 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Confused on Hybridization
- Replies: 6
- Views: 350
Re: Confused on Hybridization
Counting the regions of electron density an atom has is the quickest way to figure it out. You just add the number of atoms connected to the atom to the number of lone pairs attached and then that gives you the values (2 regions is sp, 3 is sp2, etc.).
- Sat Nov 28, 2020 10:19 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: What we need to know about bond angles
- Replies: 4
- Views: 268
Re: What we need to know about bond angles
Hi! I'm assuming that yes, you should know the general bond angles for atoms that have no lone pairs to affect the values. That means just generally knowing that linear is 180, trigonal planar is 120, tetrahedral is 109.5, etc. because those are set and from there you can make some assumptions about...
- Fri Nov 27, 2020 9:37 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Molecular Geometry
- Replies: 7
- Views: 418
Re: Molecular Geometry
Remembering molecular geometry is really just easiest through memorization, and I use flashcards to keep all of the details straight. I also do what Faith said in terms of remembering what the roots of the words mean, and it is also easy to think about the differences between a planar shape and a py...
- Fri Nov 27, 2020 9:29 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Practice Problem
- Replies: 3
- Views: 332
Re: Practice Problem
The 120 degree angle comes from the distance between the three Cl equatorial atoms around the P. They are all on the same plane, and the plane (360 degrees) is divided into three equal sections of 120.
- Fri Nov 27, 2020 9:26 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: trigonal planar vs trigonal pyramidal
- Replies: 9
- Views: 821
Re: trigonal planar vs trigonal pyramidal
The easiest way to tell is just to remember that trigonal planar has three regions of electron density that are all on the same plane. Trigonal pyramidal adds a lone pair to create four regions, forming the "pyramid" shape that gives it its name.
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:47 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Lone Pair E-
- Replies: 47
- Views: 2467
Re: Lone Pair E-
Hi, we do count regions of electron density because they affect the shape of the molecule by repelling other regions.
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:40 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Polar bonds
- Replies: 8
- Views: 256
Re: Polar bonds
Hi, I agree with the concept that the dipole moments won't cancel out. If the atoms are the same electronegativity, they will cancel, but otherwise the difference between the two means they are polar.
- Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:34 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Resonance Structures and Sigma & Pi Bonds
- Replies: 6
- Views: 516
Re: Resonance Structures and Sigma & Pi Bonds
All resonance structures have sigma and pi bonds, and when drawing the structures you just change where they go.
- Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:28 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Textbook 2E #27c
- Replies: 6
- Views: 349
Re: Textbook 2E #27c
That makes sense, thank you!
- Sat Nov 21, 2020 12:00 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Textbook 2E.1b
- Replies: 2
- Views: 93
Re: Textbook 2E.1b
I also think it becomes possible for that one to have lone pairs on the central atom because there could be one on the top of the central atom and one on the bottom, so they would repel and cancel each other out in terms of altering the linear structure.
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 11:57 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Textbook 2E #27c
- Replies: 6
- Views: 349
Textbook 2E #27c
Predict whether each of the following molecules is likely to be polar or nonpolar:
(c) CHCl3
(trichloromethane, also known as chloroform, a common organic solvent and once used as an anesthetic).
Why exactly is this molecule polar?
(c) CHCl3
(trichloromethane, also known as chloroform, a common organic solvent and once used as an anesthetic).
Why exactly is this molecule polar?
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 11:53 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: VSEPR notation
- Replies: 9
- Views: 404
Re: VSEPR notation
VSEPR notation can tell you the shape because it tells you the bonded atoms and the pairs. From there you can figure out the bond angles if they're slightly different from expected.
- Tue Nov 17, 2020 10:47 pm
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: Chem 14B enrollment [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 364
Re: Chem 14B enrollment [ENDORSED]
Okay cool, I was just going to wait through the second pass and hope enough people drop so that we can find a spot :( hopefully some spots open up!
- Tue Nov 17, 2020 10:35 pm
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: Chem 14B enrollment [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 364
Chem 14B enrollment [ENDORSED]
Can we still enroll in chem 14b if the class is full and closed? Or do we have to choose another class?
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 8:16 pm
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Oxidation Number
- Replies: 8
- Views: 469
Re: Oxidation Number
That makes sense, thank you!
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 3:39 pm
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Oxidation Number
- Replies: 8
- Views: 469
Oxidation Number
Is the only way to determine the oxidation number of something by memorizing the rules? Or is there a process we could follow?
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 3:07 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Sapling #2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 295
Re: Sapling #2
The oxygen atoms with a single bond have a formal charge of -1, while the other has a formal charge of zero because of the double bond.
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 1:34 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Sapling #2-Formal Charge
- Replies: 3
- Views: 139
Re: Sapling #2-Formal Charge
That makes sense, thank you so much!
- Thu Nov 12, 2020 9:15 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Sapling #2-Formal Charge
- Replies: 3
- Views: 139
Sapling #2-Formal Charge
Hi, how would you find the formal charge for C03^2-? For the sapling platform does it go on the central atom?
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 3:45 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Negative Sign
- Replies: 12
- Views: 939
Re: Negative Sign
If you're talking about the negative on the molecular formula itself, you use the brackets to put it outside the drawing of the Lewis structure. Otherwise, you are talking about the negative that goes with the charge of each atom in the molecule individually, so it goes with the atoms themselves.
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 3:41 pm
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Formal Charge of the Same Element
- Replies: 15
- Views: 541
Re: Formal Charge of the Same Element
I agree with what has been said about each atom having its own formal charge. It all depends on the individual bonds and lone pairs that accompany each atom, which determines the charge.
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 3:35 pm
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Bond lengths
- Replies: 20
- Views: 814
Re: Bond lengths
Hi, the drawings themselves are not very particular about the lengths of the bonds. You can draw them the same and it'll be fine, just remember that they are shorter in reality even though it is not needed in the drawing.
- Sat Nov 07, 2020 3:32 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Atom in the middle of a lewis structure
- Replies: 7
- Views: 278
Re: Atom in the middle of a lewis structure
Hi, it goes in the middle because it has the most open spaces to accept new bonds and electrons, so it is the most useful there.
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 2:23 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Atomic Radius
- Replies: 38
- Views: 3365
Re: Atomic Radius
The radius decreases across the period because the effective nuclear charge increases as you go across. This causes greater attraction to electrons that pulls them in closer to the nucleus, resulting in a smaller radius.
- Sun Nov 01, 2020 1:38 pm
- Forum: Trends in The Periodic Table
- Topic: Trends
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1217
Re: Trends
Atomic radius increases as you go down a group because more shells are being added as n increases. It decreases across a period because the effective nuclear charge increases, which pulls the electrons in closer to the nucleus of the atom.
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:23 pm
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Outline Topic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 137
Re: Outline Topic
I agree, electrons in the outer shells are there because they were excluded from inner shells due to the Pauli Exclusion Principle. Because they are physically not able to be closer, they feel less of the effects of the nucleus which lessens the energy required to remove it from the atom.
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 11:17 pm
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Excited State
- Replies: 2
- Views: 201
Re: Excited State
Thank you, I didn't understand that you had to add the exponents together!
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 10:59 pm
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Excited State
- Replies: 2
- Views: 201
Excited State
Hi, how exactly do we figure out how to go from the excited state of an atom to the ground state?
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 9:24 pm
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Sapling HW #12
- Replies: 4
- Views: 867
Re: Sapling HW #12
That makes sense, thank you!
- Fri Oct 30, 2020 8:50 pm
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Sapling HW #12
- Replies: 4
- Views: 867
Sapling HW #12
The electron affinity of thulium has been measured by a technique known as laser photodetachment electron spectroscopy. In this technique, a gaseous beam of the anions of an element is bombarded with photons from a laser. Electrons from the anion are then ejected and their energies are detected. The...
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:41 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Sapling HW #13
- Replies: 3
- Views: 111
Re: Sapling HW #13
Okay, that makes sense, thank you!
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:21 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Sapling HW #13
- Replies: 3
- Views: 111
Sapling HW #13
The E. coli bacterium is about 2.3 μm long. Suppose you want to study it using photons of that wavelength or electrons having that de Broglie wavelength. What is the energy Eelectron of the electron?
How do I find the energy of the electron for this problem?
How do I find the energy of the electron for this problem?
- Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:00 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Constants
- Replies: 21
- Views: 760
Re: Constants
Hi, I agree with what is said above. Use the amount that is specified on the formula sheet and try to avoid rounding many decimal places until the end of the problem to get the closest decimal possible. It will make it easier to match your answer to whatever is closest on the multiple choice!
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 4:26 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Sapling Homework week 2 problem 5
- Replies: 11
- Views: 575
Re: Sapling Homework week 2 problem 5
Hi! I think you have to convert the wavelengths from cm to meters before you calculate the energy, or else you end up with a different answer. If you convert the wavelength first, you should get an energy of 2.13*10-20. Hope this helps. Hi, I agree with this. Converting from cm to meters first is n...
- Fri Oct 23, 2020 4:10 pm
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Sapling 2 HW #6
- Replies: 10
- Views: 590
Re: Sapling 2 HW #6
Hi, I agree with using the equation v=R[(1/n1^2)-(1/n2^2)]. By plugging in 1 for n1, and 6 for n2, you are ensuring that you do not end up with a negative answer, which you would get if you switched those values. Hope that helps!
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:14 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Sapling HW #9
- Replies: 4
- Views: 182
Re: Sapling HW #9
Okay, that makes sense, thank you!
- Wed Oct 21, 2020 5:52 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Sapling HW #9
- Replies: 4
- Views: 182
Sapling HW #9
Calculate the wavelength, in nanometers, of the spectral line produced when an electron in a hydrogen atom undergoes the transition from the energy level n=4 to the level n=2. Hi, for this question it is asking for the wavelength, but the constant on the formula sheet is in Hz. Do we have to solve i...
- Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:32 am
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Photoelectric Effect Module #28B
- Replies: 6
- Views: 225
Re: Photoelectric Effect Module #28B
Hi! I was missing the division by Avogadro's number, so that makes much more sense! Thank you!
- Sun Oct 18, 2020 10:24 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: Photoelectric Effect Module #28B
- Replies: 6
- Views: 225
Photoelectric Effect Module #28B
Light hits a sodium metal surface and the velocity of the ejected electron is 6.61 x 105 m.s-1. The work function for sodium is 150.6 kJ.mol-1. How much energy is required to remove an electron from one sodium atom? Hi, I know this is the problem where the value for the work function comes into play...
- Sun Oct 18, 2020 9:58 pm
- Forum: Photoelectric Effect
- Topic: In a Vacuum
- Replies: 7
- Views: 227
Re: In a Vacuum
I agree, using a vacuum is necessary in this case because without a vacuum, collisions with the air molecules cause them to lose energy before reaching the detector. In order for the detector to obtain the correct readings, the vacuum is needed to reduce electron collisions and keep the maximum ener...