Search found 109 matches
- Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:33 am
- Forum: Third Law of Thermodynamics (For a Unique Ground State (W=1): S -> 0 as T -> 0) and Calculations Using Boltzmann Equation for Entropy
- Topic: Units of W
- Replies: 16
- Views: 827
Re: Units of W
Degeneracy does not have a unit assigned!
- Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:31 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Textbook 6M.5
- Replies: 5
- Views: 294
Re: Textbook 6M.5
For part A of 6M.5, we are asked to write a cell diagram for the following reaction: 2 NO3-(aq) + 8 H+(aq) + 6 Hg(l) -> 3 Hg2 (2+) (aq) + 2NO (g) + 4H2O (l) Why is that in the answer key, we put platinum at the end of the right side of the cell diagram but not on the left side? I now understand thi...
- Sat Mar 13, 2021 11:57 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: sapling week 9&10 question 13
- Replies: 3
- Views: 301
Re: sapling week 9&10 question 13
Thank you!! That helped a lot.
- Sat Mar 13, 2021 10:06 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: textbook 6.73 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 299
textbook 6.73 [ENDORSED]
Hi. Could someone walk me through how to identify the half reactions in the anode and cathode? I am aware that the left hand sides should contain Al and O2 but I don't know how to proceed. The “aluminum–air fuel cell” is used as a reserve battery in remote locations. In this cell, aluminum reacts wi...
- Sat Mar 13, 2021 5:33 am
- Forum: Appications of the Nernst Equation (e.g., Concentration Cells, Non-Standard Cell Potentials, Calculating Equilibrium Constants and pH)
- Topic: textbook 6N.1 a)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 260
textbook 6N.1 a)
Hi. I used Eº=-0.445 for this question instead of rounding it to -0.45 like what the solution does. The lnK I calculated was about -34.66. But the textbook used -35. Therefore my answer is 8.86*10^-16 while the answer's is 6*10^-6. This is pretty off. How do we decide whether or not to round our ans...
- Sat Mar 13, 2021 3:26 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Textbook 6M.5
- Replies: 5
- Views: 294
Re: Textbook 6M.5
I am also confused by why there isn't a solid. Also for question 6L.5, why does the solution add Pt(s) when there is already I2(s) in the half reaction?
- Sat Mar 13, 2021 2:22 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: 6L.5 textbook b)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 158
6L.5 textbook b)
For this question the solution is Pt(s)|I-(aq)|I2(s)||Ce4+(aq),Ce3+(aq)|Pt(s)
Why is Pt(s) necessary on the left hand side? I thought that since we already have I2(s) we cna just use it as an electrode instead?
Is it because I2 is the product of 2I-(aq) ----> I2(s) + 2e- ?
Why is Pt(s) necessary on the left hand side? I thought that since we already have I2(s) we cna just use it as an electrode instead?
Is it because I2 is the product of 2I-(aq) ----> I2(s) + 2e- ?
- Sat Mar 13, 2021 12:19 am
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: 6K.5 Part A
- Replies: 2
- Views: 206
Re: 6K.5 Part A
Oxidation reactions do not always have a change in oxidation number. The oxygen on both sides of the equation are not balanced. Try adding H2O to the right side of the equation to balance the oxygen first. And then balance the H by adding H+ and OH+ (because it is in a basic solution). Before balanc...
- Wed Mar 10, 2021 7:45 am
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: sapling week 9&10 question 13
- Replies: 3
- Views: 301
sapling week 9&10 question 13
Hi. I'm confused by sapling's solution.
How do we know that combining the concentration of H2O with the rate constants kslow, kforward, and kreverse will yield the overall rate constant k?
How do we know that combining the concentration of H2O with the rate constants kslow, kforward, and kreverse will yield the overall rate constant k?
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:49 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: qrev
- Replies: 27
- Views: 1667
Re: qrev
qrev is the of heat produced in a reversible process.
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:10 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: R constant of an Ideal Gas
- Replies: 16
- Views: 835
Re: R constant of an Ideal Gas
I usually pay attention to the units given in the question and the units the answer want us to use. If the question gives volume in liters and pressure in atm, then I would use the R constant that has units L and atm. If the questions further asks for joules, remember to convert your answer in L*atm...
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:08 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Definitions (isochoric/isometric, isothermal, isobaric)
- Topic: Useful Summary of Thermodynamic Definitions
- Replies: 55
- Views: 18631
Re: Useful Summary of Thermodynamic Definitions
Thank you for the summary! It's very useful.
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:07 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: G° vs G
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2706
Re: G° vs G
∆Gº is the gibbs free energy under standard conditions 298K and 1atm. ∆G is not under standard conditions and can vary.
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:05 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Gas Constant R
- Replies: 43
- Views: 4085
Re: Gas Constant R
I usually look at the units given in the problems to determine which R value to use. For example, if we want our answer to be in J, use 8.314.
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:04 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Delta H and Delta S both positive
- Replies: 31
- Views: 8655
Re: Delta H and Delta S both positive
When delta H and delta S are both positive, then delta G would be nagtative at high temperatures because T*∆S would be greater than ∆H. The reaction will be spontaneous
delta G would be positive at low temperatures because T*∆S would be smaller than ∆H. The reaction is non-spontaneous.
delta G would be positive at low temperatures because T*∆S would be smaller than ∆H. The reaction is non-spontaneous.
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 11:01 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Q and K
- Replies: 40
- Views: 2936
Re: Q and K
Q and K are both ratios of [products]/[reactants], but K is the ratio at equilibrium.
When Q is less than K the reaction favors to the products. When Q is greater than K the reaction favors to the reactants.
When Q is less than K the reaction favors to the products. When Q is greater than K the reaction favors to the reactants.
- Tue Feb 23, 2021 10:59 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Delta G and G naught
- Replies: 46
- Views: 4667
Re: Delta G and G naught
∆Gº is ∆G at standard conditions, while ∆G can be under any conditions and they vary with the conditions.
- Fri Feb 19, 2021 6:32 am
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: unit of w
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1255
Re: unit of w
Hi! Multiplying P (in atm) with V (in L) using the w=-PV equation will result in L*atm. We then use the conversion 1 L*atm = 101.325J to convert the units to J or further to kJ. You can find the conversion on the equation sheet.
- Thu Feb 18, 2021 11:26 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Textbook 4.7
- Replies: 3
- Views: 213
Re: Textbook 4.7
I think this is because the reaction is happening at 25ºC, at which water is liquid.
- Thu Feb 18, 2021 10:38 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: textbook 4D.9
- Replies: 1
- Views: 237
textbook 4D.9
Why is the energy per one mole of TNT positive in the solution?
The energy released per mol of reaction (-13168kJ) is negative.
The energy released per mol of reaction (-13168kJ) is negative.
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 1:13 am
- Forum: Student Social/Study Group
- Topic: Culinary Chemistry
- Replies: 239
- Views: 37468
Re: Culinary Chemistry
Thanks for recommending all these youtube channels!! I always enjoyed the relationship between cooking and chemistry but never got to systematically learn about them :)
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 1:05 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Likeliness to form products/reactants
- Replies: 27
- Views: 986
Re: Likeliness to form products/reactants
When Q<K, ∆G would be negative and the reaction is spontaneous. The reaction tends to proceed in the forward direction forming more products. When Q>K, ∆G would be positive then the reaction is nonspontaneous (or spontaneous in the reverse direction). The reaction tends to proceed in the reverse dir...
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 1:01 am
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: Sapling Week 6 Question 1
- Replies: 6
- Views: 377
Re: Sapling Week 6 Question 1
Because N2O has 3 different resonance structures, there would be multiple ways to arrange these molecules! Also, the structures with 1 double bond and 1 triple bond are asymmetrical.
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 12:55 am
- Forum: Entropy Changes Due to Changes in Volume and Temperature
- Topic: ln of T1/T2 in deltaS equation
- Replies: 2
- Views: 444
Re: ln of T1/T2 in deltaS equation
We use these different equations depending on the conditions! From the two different V values in ∆S = nRln(V2/V1), we can tell that volumn is changing. Temperature is constant. When temperature is changing and volume and pressure are constant, we would either use ∆S = nCvln(T2/T1) (Cv is the specifi...
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 12:47 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Sapling Week 5 and 6 #19
- Replies: 4
- Views: 290
Re: Sapling Week 5 and 6 #19
Given the partial pressures of the reactants and products, we can solve for Q (the reaction quotient), and then apply it into the equation ∆G = ∆Gº + RTlnQ. It's interesting how we connected things learnt ealier in this class together with what we're learning now haha
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 12:36 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: rearranging equation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 204
Re: rearranging equation
I'm not sure which part you are struggling on but I had trouble composing the desired equation from a bunch of others. The way I do it now is try to figure out which components we would like to keep and which components we want to cancel out. Then move the ones that cancel each other out to opposite...
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 12:25 am
- Forum: Entropy Changes Due to Changes in Volume and Temperature
- Topic: sapling week 5 & 6 question 8 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 142
Re: sapling week 5 & 6 question 8 [ENDORSED]
Thank you! That cleared everything up.
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 12:12 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Meaning of K
- Replies: 55
- Views: 4052
Re: Meaning of K
I agree with Madilyn! So far, I've only seen K representing the equilibrium constant in thermodynamics questions. The lowercase k representing the Boltzmann's constant will appear in the future.
- Sun Feb 14, 2021 8:57 am
- Forum: Entropy Changes Due to Changes in Volume and Temperature
- Topic: sapling week 5 & 6 question 8 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 142
sapling week 5 & 6 question 8 [ENDORSED]
Hi. I'm aware that there are 3 steps to approach this question: "1. heating the water from 41.0 °C to its normal boiling point, 100.0 °C. 2. allow it to vaporize at its normal boiling point. 3. cool the water vapor back to 41.0 °C" How did we figure out the third step that we have to cool ...
- Thu Feb 11, 2021 1:30 am
- Forum: Entropy Changes Due to Changes in Volume and Temperature
- Topic: Different R Constants
- Replies: 14
- Views: 774
Re: Different R Constants
I agree with others that it is helpful to keep track of the units! For example, if you are using pressure together with R (probably in PV=nRT), you would want to use the R value that has a pressure unit inside, which is 8.206*10^-2 L*atm*K-1*mol-1
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:58 am
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Sapling Week 3&4 HW #14
- Replies: 4
- Views: 254
Re: Sapling Week 3&4 HW #14
How do you know whether you use the initial or final V and P? I have used the same formula and ideas as Olivia so I was wondering how you know which V and P values to use. I'm not sure but I think for pathway A, when calculating the n with PV=nRT, we're using initial values of P and V because the c...
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:45 am
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Sapling Week 3&4 HW #14
- Replies: 4
- Views: 254
Re: Sapling Week 3&4 HW #14
Did you use 8.314 J/mol/K throughout your calculation? I did that too but then realized we have to use 0.08206Latm/mol/K in the PV=nRT equation when calculating for n. Because for P we are using the pressure given in atm. And then we should use 8.314 J/mol/K in w=-nRTln(V2/V1) to calculate w. Becaus...
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 7:20 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: W3-W4 Sapling question 12
- Replies: 6
- Views: 177
Re: W3-W4 Sapling question 12
I agree with the other response. In this sapling question we could also tell that we're expected to use q=c∆T by looking at the units. For the heat capacity (calorimeter constant) of the calorimeter, the unit is kJ/°C. This means that we do not consider its mass (which also makes sense since mass of...
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 6:41 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Week 3/4 Sapling #9
- Replies: 13
- Views: 757
Re: Week 3/4 Sapling #9
Because we are mixing cold water with hot water, the heat gained by cold water would equal to the heat released by hot water. We then apply the equation q=cm∆T mcold water * specific heat capacity of water* (final temperature - initial temp of cold water) = mhot water * specific heat capacity of wat...
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:42 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Sapling week 3 #6
- Replies: 12
- Views: 495
Re: Sapling week 3 #6
If you look at the textbook, bond energies are often given as positive values. When forming C-H bonds, the reaction is exogonic, which means that the energy should be negative. Hence, we need to add a negative sign to it.
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:38 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Sapling #4
- Replies: 7
- Views: 485
Re: Sapling #4
Adding on to what everyone else is saying, the bond strength of the products is weaker, this means that the system requires energy to form and maintain weaker bonds from stronger (more stable) bonds.
- Sat Jan 30, 2021 3:04 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Strong Ka
- Replies: 8
- Views: 968
Re: Strong Ka
As far as we've learnt, just remember that H2SO4 is the only exception that the first deprotonation is complete and we have to use the Ka2 value in calculations. For other polyprotic acids whose Ka1 value>Ka2, we ignore the Ka2 value.
- Sat Jan 30, 2021 3:00 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Changes in Pressure
- Replies: 10
- Views: 439
Re: Changes in Pressure
Yes you're right! Just remember changes in pressure do not affect liquids, solids, and aqueous solutions.
- Sat Jan 30, 2021 2:58 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: 4E.5 C-C Bond Enthalpy
- Replies: 6
- Views: 299
Re: 4E.5 C-C Bond Enthalpy
There are 2 types of representations for the benzene molecule, one is 3 C=C bonds and 3 C-C bonds, and an alternative one uses a circle inside the hexagon (accounting for the resonance in structure). For the alternative structure, we see the ring as composed of C⋯––C bonds.
- Fri Jan 29, 2021 7:39 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: 4.13
- Replies: 3
- Views: 149
Re: 4.13
I agree that C and H2 are omitted because they are at their standard state. You can also tell by checking appendix 2A of our textbook. The ∆Hfº of these two substances are 0, which is why they are omitted.
- Thu Jan 28, 2021 11:15 pm
- Forum: Acidity & Basicity Constants and The Conjugate Seesaw
- Topic: textbook 6D.15
- Replies: 1
- Views: 219
textbook 6D.15
For part b, I don't seem to find any Ka value for Al(H20)6^3+ in the textbook. Am I looking for the wrong one? Where did you guys find the Ka value?
- Thu Jan 28, 2021 1:45 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Taking the Anti-Log
- Replies: 37
- Views: 2672
Re: Taking the Anti-Log
For the conversion from pKa to Ka, just do 10^(-pKa).
In general, for -log(a)=b, a would equal to 10^(-b).
In general, for -log(a)=b, a would equal to 10^(-b).
- Mon Jan 25, 2021 8:33 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: textbook 5.35 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 81
textbook 5.35 [ENDORSED]
I'm confused by why the solution is dividing the partial pressure given in the plot (in kPa) by 100. If this step is a unit conversion, shouldn't we divide by 1000? If not, what is this step doing?
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:41 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Exothermic vs Endothermic
- Replies: 13
- Views: 615
Re: Exothermic vs Endothermic
We can tell by looking at the signs of the enthalpy ∆H. If ∆H is positive, the rxn will be endothermic. If ∆H is negative, the rxn will be exothermic.
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:37 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: % Ionization and % Protonation
- Replies: 11
- Views: 554
Re: % Ionization and % Protonation
So does ionization apply to both acids and bases but protonation and deprotonation only refers to either one?
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:34 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Sapling #9
- Replies: 7
- Views: 364
Re: Sapling #9
I would compare the pKa values with pH. In this case we are dealing with an acid: if pH<pKa, the environment(represented by pH) is more acidic. acid is protonated, it will remain as HA and therefore the reaction is neutral. if pH>pKa, the environment is more alkaline. The acid will give off a proton...
- Tue Jan 19, 2021 7:33 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Sapling Week 2 Question 9 & 10
- Replies: 4
- Views: 268
Re: Sapling Week 2 Question 9 & 10
For me I would compare the pKa values with pH. If we are dealing with an acid (like in question #9): if pH<pKa, the environment(represented by pH) is more acidic. acid is protonated, it will remain as HA and therefore the reaction is neutral. if pH>pKa, the environment is more alkaline. The acid wil...
- Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:41 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Q and K
- Replies: 46
- Views: 1815
Re: Q and K
Yes you're correct. Q is measured at any instant of the reaction but K is only measured after the reaction reaches equilibrium.
- Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:36 am
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: n/V = concentration
- Replies: 19
- Views: 2418
Re: n/V = concentration
Accoding to the ideal gas law, PV=nRT. If we divide both sides with V, we could have the equation for pressure: P=(nRT)/V Because n (in moles) divided by volume V(in liters) would result in concentration (in moles per liter), we could substitute n/V in the equation with concentration. Therefore, P =...
- Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:32 am
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Inert Gases
- Replies: 11
- Views: 353
Re: Inert Gases
Hi. Dr. Lavelle brought this up to demonstrate that the change caused by adding/deducting pressure isn't strictly associated by moles of gases. It's associated with concentration of gases. Adding an inert gas to a container with fixed volume only changes pressure. It does not participate in the reac...
- Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:27 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Increase in Pressure
- Replies: 31
- Views: 846
Re: Increase in Pressure
This only applies to gases. Liquid pressure has very little association with volume.
- Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:23 am
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: reversing reactions
- Replies: 83
- Views: 5554
Re: reversing reactions
K would also be inversed. It will become 1/K because the equilibrium constant for the inversed reaction is adopting a reversed product-reactant relationship.
- Thu Jan 14, 2021 1:21 am
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: T variable in pv=nrt [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 38
- Views: 1746
Re: T variable in pv=nrt [ENDORSED]
T must always be in Kelvin. But if you are given in Celcius, you can convert it into Kelvin with the equation Kelvin = Celsius + 273.15.
- Thu Jan 07, 2021 4:04 am
- Forum: General Science Questions
- Topic: mole vs. M
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3168
Re: mole vs. M
You're right M means is molarity and represents moles per Liter.
- Thu Jan 07, 2021 4:00 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Equilibrium Constant
- Replies: 8
- Views: 639
Re: Equilibrium Constant
Yes, if the denominator is the greater concentration, equilibrium constant K would be less than 1. The equilibrium lies more to the left, favoring reactants.
- Sat Dec 12, 2020 11:34 pm
- Forum: Conjugate Acids & Bases
- Topic: textbook 6.21 Thymine (& EDTA) [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 285
textbook 6.21 Thymine (& EDTA) [ENDORSED]
Hi. The solution for 6.21 says that protons can only bind to the lone pairs on nitrogen. And Dr. Lavelle's reply in another post explains that: "Oxygen, as the more electronegative element, holds more tightly to its lone pair than the nitrogen. The nitrogen lone pair, therefore, is more availab...
- Sat Dec 12, 2020 9:41 pm
- Forum: Lewis Acids & Bases
- Topic: textbook 6A.15
- Replies: 1
- Views: 247
textbook 6A.15
For question b), I drew SO2 with 2 double bonds, 2 lone pairs on each of the two O atoms, and a S with expanded octet. Everything else is like what the solution has shown.
Is my answer also correct? Does the structure of SO2 have to have 1 single and 1 double bond in this case?
Is my answer also correct? Does the structure of SO2 have to have 1 single and 1 double bond in this case?
- Sat Dec 12, 2020 9:49 am
- Forum: Coordinate Covalent Bonds
- Topic: textbook 9C.5 b)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 209
textbook 9C.5 b)
Can someone explain why carbonato (CO3^2-) can be either monodentate or bidentate?
The solution says it can bind a metal ion through either one or two of the oxygen ions.
How does this happen? And why is the third oxygen ion left out?
The solution says it can bind a metal ion through either one or two of the oxygen ions.
How does this happen? And why is the third oxygen ion left out?
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 8:07 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Bases
- Topic: Hard/soft water clarification
- Replies: 4
- Views: 425
Hard/soft water clarification
Dr. Lavelle mentions soft water is alkaline and hard water is acidic in lecture.
But all my google results tell me that "hard water is more alkaline and has a higher mineral content than soft".
Which one should I believe in? Or does it depend on specific situations?
But all my google results tell me that "hard water is more alkaline and has a higher mineral content than soft".
Which one should I believe in? Or does it depend on specific situations?
- Fri Dec 11, 2020 12:14 am
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: Sapling Week 10 #13
- Replies: 7
- Views: 439
Re: Sapling Week 10 #13
Adding on, if pH > pKa, it means that the environmnet (solution) is more alkaline. The acid would give out a proton to form an anion to neutralize it (acid is deprotonated).
if pH < pKa, the environment is more acidic than the acid. The acid does not change anything (acid is protonated).
if pH < pKa, the environment is more acidic than the acid. The acid does not change anything (acid is protonated).
- Wed Dec 09, 2020 10:03 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: week 10 Sapling Q12
- Replies: 2
- Views: 162
week 10 Sapling Q12
Could someone please explain why would the strength of the bond to hydrogen decrease as the number of oxygen atoms increases?
Thank you!
Thank you!
- Wed Dec 09, 2020 9:23 am
- Forum: Identifying Acidic & Basic Salts
- Topic: week 10 Sapling Q7
- Replies: 5
- Views: 436
week 10 Sapling Q7
I am stuck with this problem. Could someone tell me what I did wrong?
The feedback says I have not identified all the basic salts.
Much appreciated
The feedback says I have not identified all the basic salts.
Much appreciated
- Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:55 am
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Sapling #6 week 10
- Replies: 4
- Views: 386
Re: Sapling #6 week 10
Hi. I had the same question before and found this response by varlam17 on https://www.reddit.com/r/chemistry/comments/c5z6be/how_is_hydrogen_cyanide_hcn_defined_as_a_lewis/. "If a compound has a lone pair that does not guarantee that it's a base. Base and acid are relative, not absolute. A mole...
- Wed Dec 09, 2020 7:21 am
- Forum: Properties & Structures of Inorganic & Organic Acids
- Topic: Sapling Q #1
- Replies: 7
- Views: 344
Re: Sapling Q #1
Here's a tip for memorizing strong acids that I learnt from Michael's UA session.
All the capitalized letters will remind you of a strong acid:
SO I BRought NO CLean ClOthes
SO: H2SO4
I: HI
BR: HBr
NO: HNO3
CL: HCl
CLO: HClO4 & HClO3
I don't know if there's one for strong bases though.
All the capitalized letters will remind you of a strong acid:
SO I BRought NO CLean ClOthes
SO: H2SO4
I: HI
BR: HBr
NO: HNO3
CL: HCl
CLO: HClO4 & HClO3
I don't know if there's one for strong bases though.
- Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:19 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Oxidation State for Sapling q. 6
- Replies: 2
- Views: 193
Re: Oxidation State for Sapling q. 6
You can approach this problem like this.
Since the coordination compound is neutral, it has a net charge of 0.
Co+5(NH3)+5Cl+2Cl=0
Co+5(NH3)+5Cl= - 2Cl
Co+5(NH3)+5Cl= +2
Hope this helps!
Since the coordination compound is neutral, it has a net charge of 0.
Co+5(NH3)+5Cl+2Cl=0
Co+5(NH3)+5Cl= - 2Cl
Co+5(NH3)+5Cl= +2
Hope this helps!
- Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:11 am
- Forum: Biological Examples
- Topic: en and edta
- Replies: 6
- Views: 653
Re: en and edta
Adding on, there is also a coordination compound called diethylenetriamine (dien) that is on the naming coordination compound sheet: https://lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/wp-content/supporting-files/Chem14A/NamingCoordinationCompounds.pdf I memorize this together with en by looking at the number of N in the...
- Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:45 am
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: how to tell coordination number
- Replies: 3
- Views: 268
how to tell coordination number
I usually find coordination # directly from the molecular formula by counting the number of ligands in the bracket. Is this always correct? Are there any special cases where we need to draw the lewis structure to find out?
- Tue Dec 01, 2020 7:27 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: 4 ligands shape
- Replies: 5
- Views: 309
4 ligands shape
Dr. Lavelle mentioned in class that if coordination number is 4, the shape would be either square planar or tetrahedral.
Why isn't the seesaw shape included?
Why isn't the seesaw shape included?
- Fri Nov 27, 2020 2:02 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Shape Names
- Replies: 50
- Views: 2587
Re: Shape Names
You are correct. It can be called angular or bent.
- Fri Nov 27, 2020 1:58 am
- Forum: Bond Lengths & Energies
- Topic: Textbook Question 3F.15
- Replies: 8
- Views: 560
Re: Textbook Question 3F.15
AsF3 has a higher boiling point because it has both dipole-dipole and LDF, while AsF5 only has LDF.
AsF3 is a trigonal pyramidal shape while AsF5 is tribgonal bipyramidal (symmetrical).
Therefore, dipole moments of AsF3 do not cancel, making it a polar molecule.
AsF3 is a trigonal pyramidal shape while AsF5 is tribgonal bipyramidal (symmetrical).
Therefore, dipole moments of AsF3 do not cancel, making it a polar molecule.
- Fri Nov 27, 2020 1:49 am
- Forum: Interionic and Intermolecular Forces (Ion-Ion, Ion-Dipole, Dipole-Dipole, Dipole-Induced Dipole, Dispersion/Induced Dipole-Induced Dipole/London Forces, Hydrogen Bonding)
- Topic: Textbook 3f. 3
- Replies: 3
- Views: 265
Re: Textbook 3f. 3
Adding on, if all the atoms except for the central atom are the same, and if the shape is a base geometry (meaning that there are no lone pairs), then the molecule would be always non-polar and dipole moments always cancel out!
- Fri Nov 27, 2020 1:35 am
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Sp3d or dsp3
- Replies: 22
- Views: 2230
Re: Sp3d or dsp3
Both are correct and I prefer to use sp3d because it is easier to memorize!
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 8:22 am
- Forum: Interionic and Intermolecular Forces (Ion-Ion, Ion-Dipole, Dipole-Dipole, Dipole-Induced Dipole, Dispersion/Induced Dipole-Induced Dipole/London Forces, Hydrogen Bonding)
- Topic: hydrogen bonding
- Replies: 7
- Views: 392
hydrogen bonding
I am confused with how we can determine if a molecule satisfies the requirements for hydrogen bonding just by looking at the molecular formula. I know we need to draw lewis structures, but I don't know under what circumstances an atom does NOT bond to the central atom. For example, H2SeO4 in textboo...
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:19 am
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: textbook 2C.3 d)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 274
textbook 2C.3 d)
Why is this structure wrong for arsenic ion (first pic)? The text book solutions included only 1 double bond.
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 12:16 am
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: textbook 2C.3 c)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 187
textbook 2C.3 c)
Hi. For chloric acid, how do we know if H is bonded to O instead of being bonded to the central atom Cl?
- Mon Nov 16, 2020 7:17 am
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Textbook 2A.15 d)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 180
Re: Textbook 2A.15 d)
Benjamin_Hugh_1G wrote:The electron configuration is actually [Ar] 3d10 4s2 4p1. I believe the reason why Ga3+ is preferred over Ga+ is that removing 3 electrons will give Gallium a full shell, making it more stable.
Gotcha. thank you! I meant Ga+: [Ar]3d10 4s2 in my question. Sorry about the typo.
- Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:48 am
- Forum: Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms
- Topic: Textbook 2A.15 d)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 180
Textbook 2A.15 d)
Write the most likely charge for the ions formed by each of the following elements: d) Ga
Why is the answer Ga3+ instead of Ga+? Isn't it better to remove 1 electrons and form Ga: [Ar]3d10 4s2?
Why is the answer Ga3+ instead of Ga+? Isn't it better to remove 1 electrons and form Ga: [Ar]3d10 4s2?
- Thu Nov 12, 2020 5:35 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Sapling hw 3
- Replies: 11
- Views: 582
Sapling hw 3
Hi. Can someone please tell me why is this lewis structure wrong for nitrate ion?
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 8:43 am
- Forum: Dipole Moments
- Topic: Definition of Dipole
- Replies: 7
- Views: 407
Re: Definition of Dipole
Dipole means that electrons are not shared equally! So they only exist in covalent bonds where atoms share electrons to form bonds.
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 8:22 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: periodic table
- Replies: 16
- Views: 829
Re: periodic table
Basically electronegativity, electron affinity, and ionization energy all follow the same trend: increasing across a period and increasing up a group. I like to memorize the increasing trends with an arrow pointing to the upper right corner of the periodic table if that makes sense. Atomic radius is...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 8:17 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: C Valence Electrons
- Replies: 5
- Views: 256
Re: C Valence Electrons
Hi! To determine the valence electrons I usually count from the first element in the period. In this case, C is the 4th element in the period (Li, Be, B, C). Therefore, 4 valence electrons.
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 8:04 am
- Forum: Electronegativity
- Topic: London Dispersion Forces
- Replies: 9
- Views: 806
Re: London Dispersion Forces
I usually just rule out the ones that have other intermolecular forces. Look out for polar molecules and ions. If there is a polar molecule, then we can identify either ion-dipole, dipole-dipole, dipole-induced dipole and hydrogen bonding. If there are two ions, we can identify ion-ion. So we are lo...
- Wed Nov 11, 2020 7:54 am
- Forum: Polarisability of Anions, The Polarizing Power of Cations
- Topic: increasing polarizability
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1109
Re: increasing polarizability
I agree with everyone else that bigger anions have larger polarizability. I just want to add that this is because bigger anions' electron clouds are more easily distorted because they are farther from the neucleus and less tightly held.
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:21 am
- Forum: Coordinate Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Coordinate covalent bond lecture example
- Replies: 4
- Views: 269
Re: Coordinate covalent bond lecture example
Dr. Lavelle used BF3 to discuss an exception of the octet rule: in this case B only has 6 electrons.
and he used BF4– as an example of when B completes its octet with both 2 electrons provided by F–
and he used BF4– as an example of when B completes its octet with both 2 electrons provided by F–
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:12 am
- Forum: Resonance Structures
- Topic: Delocalized e-
- Replies: 5
- Views: 222
Re: Delocalized e-
Delocalized electrons are electrons that is not fixed occur in a specific bond, and have equal probability of being located in any of the bonds involved in the resonance structure.
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 1:03 am
- Forum: Octet Exceptions
- Topic: Group 13 Elements
- Replies: 13
- Views: 531
Re: Group 13 Elements
It is okay for all group 13 elements to not have an octet because they all have 3 valence electrons that requires an unrealistic amount of electrons to form octet.
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:51 am
- Forum: Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers
- Topic: Formal Charge Equation
- Replies: 16
- Views: 641
Re: Formal Charge Equation
L represents the number of lone pairs and you can count the number of dots around each atom from the lewis structure.
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:37 am
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Size of Bonds
- Replies: 28
- Views: 915
Re: Size of Bonds
Double bonds (4 e) have more electrons than single bonds (2 e), and have a stronger negative charge, atrracting the nuclei of the bonding atoms that are charged positively. The attraction is stronger, thus the half distance between centers of the bonding atoms is shorter.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:41 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Incident Light
- Replies: 5
- Views: 270
Re: Incident Light
Incident light is the incoming light.
For example, in the photoelectric effect experiment, energy of the incident light = work function + kinetic energy of electrons ejected.
For example, in the photoelectric effect experiment, energy of the incident light = work function + kinetic energy of electrons ejected.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:37 am
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: m vs nm
- Replies: 66
- Views: 3766
Re: m vs nm
I agree with everyone that as long as conversion is correct, you're fine.
But if the unit for the anwser is already implied in the question, do what the question asks.
But if the unit for the anwser is already implied in the question, do what the question asks.
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:34 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Balmer and Lyman Series
- Replies: 3
- Views: 219
Re: Balmer and Lyman Series
The Lyman series is the UV region. Excited electrons return to the n=1 shell.
The Balmer series is the visual light region. Excited electrons return to the n=2 shell. If you see the light has colors in the question, this means that they fall into the Balmer series (e.g. blue light, red light etc).
The Balmer series is the visual light region. Excited electrons return to the n=2 shell. If you see the light has colors in the question, this means that they fall into the Balmer series (e.g. blue light, red light etc).
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:24 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Absorption and emission spectrum
- Replies: 4
- Views: 185
Absorption and emission spectrum
Hi.
I was wondering why is the emission spectrum dark with colored lines, and why does the absorption specturm have black lines?
What caused this difference?
I was wondering why is the emission spectrum dark with colored lines, and why does the absorption specturm have black lines?
What caused this difference?
- Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:17 am
- Forum: Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation
- Topic: Textbook 1B.25
- Replies: 1
- Views: 100
Textbook 1B.25
"What is the minimum uncertainty in the speed of an electron confined within a lead atom of diameter 350. pm? Model the atom as a one-dimensional box with a length equal to the diameter of the actual atom." The solution manual assumed that "the uncertainty in the position of the elect...
- Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:24 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Lyman vs. Balmer series
- Replies: 20
- Views: 1974
Re: Lyman vs. Balmer series
The lyman series is the UV light region, with electrons transitions to ground state (shell n=1). They have the high energy because of the large gap between n=2 and n=1.
The Balmer seires is the visual light region, with electrons transitions to shell n=2.
The Balmer seires is the visual light region, with electrons transitions to shell n=2.
- Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:19 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: calculating the frequency of light
- Replies: 4
- Views: 197
Re: calculating the frequency of light
We are using the empirical equation for H-atom. En= - hR/n^2
Professor Lavelle was using an example with transitions from n=4 to n=2.
So it would be (-1/16)*hR and (-1/4)*hR.
Professor Lavelle was using an example with transitions from n=4 to n=2.
So it would be (-1/16)*hR and (-1/4)*hR.
- Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:13 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Energy per Photon
- Replies: 7
- Views: 242
Re: Energy per Photon
The energy of a photon is equal to the required energy to remove an electron only if there is no excess energy (i.e. kinetic energy of the electron = 0).
If there is excess kinetic energy, than the energy of a photon is greater than the required energy to remove an electron.
Hope that makes sense.
If there is excess kinetic energy, than the energy of a photon is greater than the required energy to remove an electron.
Hope that makes sense.
- Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:08 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Electrons Excited or Ejected
- Replies: 19
- Views: 940
Re: Electrons Excited or Ejected
So an electron has to be excited first for it to be ejected out of the shell? Or are they completely unrelated?
- Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:02 am
- Forum: Properties of Electrons
- Topic: Sapling 2 HW #6
- Replies: 10
- Views: 557
Re: Sapling 2 HW #6
Hi! From what I saw on Sapling, the question said "the electron in a hydrogen atom is excited to the n=6 shell", so I assume there was a typo in your question. If it is currently excited to the n=6 shell, it could return to either n=5, n=4, n=3, n=2, n=1. So there are 5 possible outcomes o...
- Tue Oct 13, 2020 1:55 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Photoelectron Effect: POST/PRE Module Assessment #28-30
- Replies: 6
- Views: 222
Re: Photoelectron Effect: POST/PRE Module Assessment #28-30
For Part C, I followed through those steps, but I still got the wrong answer. Can someone point out where I went wrong? Ephoton= 1.506 x 10^5 + 1.99x10^-19 (answer from part a) Ephoton= 150600 You haven't converted from Joule per mole to Joule per atom 1.506*10^5 is still in Joules per mole. Just d...
- Tue Oct 13, 2020 1:50 am
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: What exactly is Φ?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 1090
Re: What exactly is Φ?
It is the work function/threshold energy: the energy to remove electrons. It is usually given in the question so you don't have to worry! If not, then you would have to find it using the equation hv=Ek + Φ. I am sure the other conditions will be given for you to apply this equation.