Search found 62 matches
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:38 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: ICE Box quadratic equation
- Replies: 10
- Views: 26
Re: ICE Box quadratic equation
So from solving multiple problems, the fault I can see is it is either one answer of x will be negative or one answer will be too large which will result in the concentration total to be negative therefore it would have to be the other.
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:36 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Reactants and Products
- Replies: 9
- Views: 31
Re: Reactants and Products
Yes left side will always be reactants and right side will always be products, even if the reaction goes both ways, it is important to know this as this will be the Kc with those molecules as reactants and products. If flipped Kc would be the inverse or 1/Kc.
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:33 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Sapling Week 1 #10
- Replies: 8
- Views: 28
Re: Sapling Week 1 #10
so basically you're trying to find what the new equilibrium concentration would be if you added 1.0 M of NO2. So with the Kc you found from the original, you would then use icebox to solve what the new concentrations would be with 1.0 M added to NO2. Aka the initial would be 3.28 for NO2 and .463 fo...
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:29 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: ICE Box
- Replies: 28
- Views: 74
Re: ICE Box
I would usually use ICE box to make sure all the steps I made were correct, it really is the most correct way to solve things even if there's something easier. I would use it to check your answer sometimes if you're unsure.
- Sun Jan 17, 2021 10:28 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Week 1 Sapling #10
- Replies: 6
- Views: 43
Re: Week 1 Sapling #10
so basically what you would do to solve this is using the ICE box, your initial would now be 2.94 for NO2 and 0.335 for N2O4, then you would solve it like the usual ICE box problem you do using the equilibrium constant you found for the first problem. Afterward, you would use the smallest x you solv...
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:15 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Using "ICE"
- Replies: 9
- Views: 35
Re: Using "ICE"
I believe you should always convert to moles, just so you can get the whole picture for the problem and just incase you do need it.
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:13 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Reviewing PV=NRT
- Replies: 7
- Views: 55
Re: Reviewing PV=NRT
You can only find the odd-numbered answers in the back of the book
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:12 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Units for Pressure
- Replies: 41
- Views: 814
Re: Units for Pressure
I believe it is with respect to the problem and what units they give, sometimes it can give mmHg or atm or torr, but take it with a grain of salt, you should ask a TA this question
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:10 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Units of Temperature
- Replies: 82
- Views: 287
Re: Units of Temperature
always has to be in kelvin
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:07 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: PV=nRT and concentration
- Replies: 27
- Views: 109
Re: PV=nRT and concentration
because its moles over volume, that is the measurement for molarity, therefore n/V is molarity
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:36 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Hybridization and Shape
- Replies: 6
- Views: 49
Re: Hybridization and Shape
I wouldn't necessarily base the shape off its hybridization, as hybridization only gives the electron density connections, I would mostly base it off the AXE format, as it allows you to know how many electrons and actual elements its connected to
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:34 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: ONO vs. NO2
- Replies: 9
- Views: 78
Re: ONO vs. NO2
They're the same, just allows you to draw the lewis dot structure easier
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: K[Cu(en)2 (CN)2 ]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 60
Re: K[Cu(en)2 (CN)2 ]
Because it's bonded with a K+, the necessary Cu charge for it to be a non charged compound is Cu(I)
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:32 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Cobalt vs Cobaltate
- Replies: 12
- Views: 75
Re: Cobalt vs Cobaltate
there's a charge in the compound therefore it is cobaltate
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:31 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Bronsted vs Lewis Acids and Bases
- Replies: 8
- Views: 59
Re: Bronsted vs Lewis Acids and Bases
I believe the lewis theory was based off the bronsted
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:30 pm
- Forum: Student Social/Study Group
- Topic: How are you studying?
- Replies: 203
- Views: 1286
Re: How are you studying?
I basically went over my notes over a span of two weeks, went from week 1 to week 10 and did problems here and there, what also helped were the review sessions going over specific topics
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:22 pm
- Forum: General Science Questions
- Topic: study methods/recs
- Replies: 37
- Views: 279
Re: study methods/recs
I recommend going to office hours and going over the past midterms with TA, then doing more textbook problems from the last three weeks
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:21 pm
- Forum: General Science Questions
- Topic: bond lengths
- Replies: 10
- Views: 125
Re: bond lengths
it's just a coincidence, not necessarily specific, just know that double is shorter than single and triple is shorter than double
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:20 pm
- Forum: General Science Questions
- Topic: atomic radius
- Replies: 7
- Views: 53
Re: atomic radius
Cl- is bigger because of the extra electron, that extra electron allows for more push from protons making the atomic radius larger
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:19 pm
- Forum: General Science Questions
- Topic: Passing Grade
- Replies: 34
- Views: 226
Re: Passing Grade
it means if you get a 50% in the class, you will receive a C-, anything below will be a fail
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:18 pm
- Forum: General Science Questions
- Topic: final exam
- Replies: 9
- Views: 111
Re: final exam
the final was cummulative, it included everything from week 1 to 10 unfortunately
- Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:17 pm
- Forum: General Science Questions
- Topic: curve
- Replies: 16
- Views: 153
Re: curve
there was no curve administered, it was just 10 points added
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:34 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: HW Question coordination number
- Replies: 4
- Views: 25
Re: HW Question coordination number
Co is bonded with 1 SO4 and 5 NH3 compounds, therefore the coordination compound is 6, remember that the number of bonds to the central metal ion determines its coordination number, only counts inside brackets also
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:29 pm
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: Oxidation #
- Replies: 6
- Views: 43
Re: Oxidation #
unfortunately you kind of have to memorize the common oxidation numbers in order to find oxidation numbers of others, some I can grab at the top of my head it nitrite (no2-), nitrate (no3-), group elements from group 17 will always be -1, group elements from element 1 will always be +1, and group el...
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:23 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: Order of Ligands/naming
- Replies: 28
- Views: 136
Re: Order of Ligands/naming
it goes by alphabetical order, and literally by alphabetical order of the ions, so other examples were Co(NH3)3CL3, therefore since ammine is A and chlorine is C, it is first ammine triamminetrichlorocobalt(III)
- Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:21 pm
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: "(en)" Sapling
- Replies: 19
- Views: 108
Re: "(en)" Sapling
it is short for ethylenediamine
Re: Sapling 1
naming is based on the literal name of the compounds so because ammine is A and Chloride is C, ammine comes first, then chloride
Re: Sapling 1
remember that the chlorine is inside the bracket so it is included in the name, it will be triamminetrichlorocobalt(III)
- Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:21 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Sapling #11
- Replies: 19
- Views: 115
Re: Sapling #11
Hi, so you have to read the question thoroughly as it asks specifically what is the hybridization of Phosphorus , which then allows you to see then how many bonds and how many lone pairs are connected to the phosphorus, allowing you to then find the hybridization, dont let the picture intimidate you...
- Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:16 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Delocalized Pi Bonds
- Replies: 3
- Views: 56
Re: Delocalized Pi Bonds
If they can form a resonance structure, they can form delocalized pi bonds
- Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:15 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Angles of Bonding Pairs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 56
Re: Angles of Bonding Pairs
I think you should know the shapes of the molecules which will allow you to figure out the angles
- Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:13 pm
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Hybridization
- Replies: 4
- Views: 48
Re: Hybridization
Hi, yes please take a look at table 2F.1 in the book, and it'll help you figure out the hybridization, based off the name of the shape as well as the orbitals
- Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:11 pm
- Forum: Hybridization
- Topic: Sapling #12
- Replies: 27
- Views: 180
Re: Sapling #12
Because there is a total of 4 bonds for C, and 2 bonds with O and 2 lone pairs on O, the hybridization is found out to be SP3
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:48 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Strong Vs. Weak Acids and Bases
- Replies: 3
- Views: 147
Re: Strong Vs. Weak Acids and Bases
I've stated this earlier, memorize all the strong acids using flashcards, and memorize that all strong bases are OH- molecules .
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:47 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Strong Acids and Bases
- Replies: 2
- Views: 125
Re: Strong Acids and Bases
It is recommended to memorize all the strong acids, as if you have seen all strong bases are basically OH- chemicals, it'll shorten the time for you when doing the math.
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:44 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Hydrogen Bonding
- Replies: 16
- Views: 309
Re: Hydrogen Bonding
No not at all, one is based on a chemical reaction while the other is based on an intermolecular force, do not get both mixed.
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:42 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Bronsted vs. Lewis Acids/Bases
- Replies: 2
- Views: 132
Re: Bronsted vs. Lewis Acids/Bases
From what I remember in High school chem, if this isn't correct please feel free to correct me, the Lewis acid-base was a furthermore specific explanation based on the Bronsted-Lowry explanation on acids and bases, that is why bronsted rules apply to lewis acid/bases but not vice versa.
- Sun Nov 22, 2020 11:34 pm
- Forum: Bronsted Acids & Bases
- Topic: Strong Acids and Bases
- Replies: 8
- Views: 211
Re: Strong Acids and Bases
The table can be found in the textbook, cheers
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 9:07 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Sapling #17: BF3 & NF3
- Replies: 3
- Views: 35
Re: Sapling #17: BF3 & NF3
Its because NF3 has a lone pair that contributes to its shape, unlike BF3 where B does not have a lone pair that contributes, therefore making it trigonal planar
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 9:04 pm
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: Sapling #20
- Replies: 12
- Views: 93
Re: Sapling #20
H is not bonded to anything highly electronegative aka N, O, or F.
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 9:01 pm
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: S and P electrons
- Replies: 14
- Views: 114
Re: S and P electrons
because p is farther away from the nucleus (therefore farther away from protons), you need more energy to keep the electrons from leaving the atom, that's how I think of it
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:59 pm
- Forum: Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals
- Topic: What are orbitals?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 112
Re: What are orbitals?
think of orbitals as an electron cloud where you can spot an electron at a specific place at a specific time, not really much to it
- Sun Nov 15, 2020 8:52 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: Sapling Week 4 #23
- Replies: 3
- Views: 118
Re: Sapling Week 4 #23
When 1 mole of atoms is being asked, then you multiply by Avogadro's number, but since only 1 atom is being asked you did not need to multiply
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 9:52 pm
- Forum: DeBroglie Equation
- Topic: Solving for v
- Replies: 7
- Views: 40
Re: Solving for v
v= h/(m*lambda)
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 9:50 pm
- Forum: Einstein Equation
- Topic: E=pc vs E=hv
- Replies: 15
- Views: 149
Re: E=pc vs E=hv
both find similar answers, it just depends on what is given
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 9:48 pm
- Forum: Dipole Moments
- Topic: Hydrogen bonds
- Replies: 9
- Views: 207
Re: Hydrogen bonds
It has to be hydrogen paired with (of course itself), or F, O, or N
- Sun Nov 08, 2020 9:46 pm
- Forum: Ionic & Covalent Bonds
- Topic: Chemical Bonds
- Replies: 12
- Views: 65
Re: Chemical Bonds
Double bonds are shorter because there are two bonds pulling on two particles rather than just one, making the bond (combined) stronger than a single
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 12:02 am
- Forum: DeBroglie Equation
- Topic: Sapling Week 2-4 HW Question 24
- Replies: 11
- Views: 127
Re: Sapling Week 2-4 HW Question 24
when the wavelength is continuous from when you add the picture again to both sides, it is compatible, but if the wavelength is not continuous when you add the photo of the wave from either side, then it is not compatible
- Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:58 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Week 2 Homework Sapling #7
- Replies: 5
- Views: 68
Re: Week 2 Homework Sapling #7
First find the frequency using the c=lambda times frequency equation, then find the energy when the frequency is found using the E=hv equation, then with the number of grams of ice, multiply it times the enthalpy of fusion; then with the energy found divide the answer multiplied with grams of ice an...
- Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:56 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Sapling Hw #5
- Replies: 5
- Views: 67
Re: Sapling Hw #5
from wavelength find the frequency, then once frequency is found, find energy, using E=hv, then multiply grams of ice by the enthalpy of fusion (per gram), then divide that by the energy you got from E=hv and you should get the answer
- Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:53 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Sapling #10
- Replies: 8
- Views: 159
Re: Sapling #10
divide the mass of flourine by Avagadro's constant then multiply times 2 because it is diatomic and the rest should be smooth sailing
- Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:46 pm
- Forum: Lewis Acids & Bases
- Topic: Water
- Replies: 62
- Views: 488
Re: Water
it depends on the problem given, it can act as a base and an acid
- Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:15 pm
- Forum: Properties of Light
- Topic: Photoelectric effect equations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 51
Re: Photoelectric effect equations
I would write down what is given and what the question is asking you to find, then I would go on the equation handout and find the equation to use to solve the problem, I would say that is the easiest way.
- Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:12 pm
- Forum: Student Social/Study Group
- Topic: How are you studying?
- Replies: 203
- Views: 1286
Re: How are you studying?
To be honest, I believe everything you need to know about the midterm are the questions that is given on the syllabus, I would work through all those questions in order to understand the topic as a whole.
- Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:09 pm
- Forum: *Black Body Radiation
- Topic: Equation
- Replies: 8
- Views: 222
Re: Equation
All equations needed I believe are in a handout that will be given before midterm and such, no equations will be needed to be memorized I believe.
- Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:07 pm
- Forum: Accuracy, Precision, Mole, Other Definitions
- Topic: Preference on Scientific Notation
- Replies: 13
- Views: 159
Re: Preference on Scientific Notation
writing it does not matter, but usually as I know, it is preferred to use 10^x instead to reduce any confusions and such, though I do know phone calculators use e
- Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:05 pm
- Forum: Significant Figures
- Topic: Sig Figs and Scientific Notation
- Replies: 10
- Views: 98
Re: Sig Figs and Scientific Notation
the 10^x does not count, the first part does as 10^x basically means the number of 0s that come afterward
- Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:30 pm
- Forum: Balancing Chemical Reactions
- Topic: Order of Balancing Rxns
- Replies: 23
- Views: 115
Re: Order of Balancing Rxns
How I keep on track is basically I write the amount of moles of the certain element on top of it, for example CO2 I put 1 on top of C and 2 on top of O, after labeling all the elements, I check both sides if both sides of the equation have the same amount moles of elements. Then if there are any cha...
- Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:27 pm
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Sampling #9
- Replies: 7
- Views: 66
Re: Sampling #9
I would start off first with the amount of grams you would get from the combustion formula for both Carbon and Hydrogen. First use the grams of CO2 and work backwords towards C to find the grams of C. Then use the grams of H2O and work backwords to find the grams of H. To get grams of O, take the to...
- Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:23 pm
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Stuck on Sapling HW
- Replies: 14
- Views: 199
Re: Stuck on Sapling HW
First you would like to find out how many moles the total grams have, then conver that to Liters using the molarity given, afterwards then convert Liters to militers and you should be able to get the answer.
- Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:22 pm
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Sapling HW #6
- Replies: 8
- Views: 81
Re: Sapling HW #6
Hi, most likely your molar mass is wrong as the molar mass is 125.55 g
- Sun Oct 11, 2020 9:19 pm
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Sapling HW Number 7
- Replies: 12
- Views: 129
Re: Sapling HW Number 7
Hi there! For number seven you approach it basically as (if 36% is given by mass) 36 g of CaCl2 /100 g of solution!