Search found 82 matches
- Sun Mar 14, 2021 11:45 pm
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: G° vs G
- Replies: 30
- Views: 2823
Re: G° vs G
Delta G naught is standard conditions. Delta G is at any point; if equal to delta G naught, it's at equilibrium.
- Sun Mar 14, 2021 11:42 pm
- Forum: Calculating Standard Reaction Entropies (e.g. , Using Standard Molar Entropies)
- Topic: Spontaneous
- Replies: 20
- Views: 1300
Re: Spontaneous
When deltaG is negative it's spontaneous. It wants to get to a lower free energy state.
- Sun Mar 14, 2021 11:36 pm
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using First Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: specific vs molar heat capacity
- Replies: 16
- Views: 982
Re: specific vs molar heat capacity
Specific is the amount per gram and molar is the amount per mole.
- Sun Mar 14, 2021 11:35 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: when to add Pt (s)
- Replies: 23
- Views: 1087
Re: when to add Pt (s)
Typically when there is no conducting metal on that certain side. It is used as an inert conductor.
- Sun Mar 14, 2021 11:34 pm
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: points on final?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 946
Re: points on final?
It's 144 total (with bonus) but the max is 140.
- Thu Mar 11, 2021 10:50 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: DeltaG = - n F E
- Replies: 3
- Views: 208
DeltaG = - n F E
Does this only apply to find Delta G naught or can you use it to find Delta G, given delta E is not in standard conditions?
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:49 pm
- Forum: Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts
- Topic: Textbook 7D.7
- Replies: 2
- Views: 182
Re: Textbook 7D.7
You just divide the forward rate over the reverse rate.
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:48 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: 6L.5
- Replies: 2
- Views: 221
Re: 6L.5
I2 is not a metal so it cannot conduct.
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:45 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: How to determine Cathode and Anode
- Replies: 3
- Views: 509
Re: How to determine Cathode and Anode
Cathode is what is getting reduced. Anode is what is getting oxidized. Usually, the lower E would be oxidized (anode) to try to get a positive E for a galvanic cell.
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:42 pm
- Forum: General Rate Laws
- Topic: Final Exam
- Replies: 19
- Views: 846
Re: Final Exam
It will be cumulative, everything from the class.
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:41 pm
- Forum: Reaction Mechanisms, Reaction Profiles
- Topic: k'
- Replies: 17
- Views: 894
Re: k'
It represents the rate constant of the reverse reaction.
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:33 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Calculating n
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1069
Re: Calculating n
It is the amount of electrons transferred. When given half-reactions, you would have to scale them to have the same amount of electrons transferred.
Ex.
Ce4+ + 2e --> Ce2+
Fe --> Fe3+ + 3e
Scale to six, you get 6e.
Ex.
Ce4+ + 2e --> Ce2+
Fe --> Fe3+ + 3e
Scale to six, you get 6e.
- Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:24 pm
- Forum: Acidity & Basicity Constants and The Conjugate Seesaw
- Topic: Increasing/Decreasing pH and buffer solutions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 382
Re: Increasing/Decreasing pH and buffer solutions
Adding acidic stuff lowers pH and adding basic stuff raises the pH.
- Sun Mar 07, 2021 11:50 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: E at equilibrium
- Replies: 7
- Views: 656
E at equilibrium
Is E at equilibrium zero or equal to E naught?
- Sun Mar 07, 2021 11:49 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: E vs E naught
- Replies: 36
- Views: 1875
Re: E vs E naught
E naught is E at the standard conditions. E can be at any conditions.
- Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:52 pm
- Forum: Second Order Reactions
- Topic: half life for second-order reactions
- Replies: 9
- Views: 583
Re: half life for second-order reactions
I think it's because second order depends on the concentration. The half life is different for each concentration, you can't just do that to find 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, and so on.
- Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:49 pm
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: 6N.17 Textbook Question
- Replies: 3
- Views: 674
Re: 6N.17 Textbook Question
I believe you find the delta E (it's a concentration cell) and know that the amount of electrons transferred is 1. Then, use -nFE.
- Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:44 pm
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: 6L.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 343
Re: 6L.1
I believe n is the amount of moles of electrons transferred.
- Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:42 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Work sign
- Replies: 46
- Views: 2234
Re: Work sign
When system does work, it's negative. When work is done on the system, it's positive.
- Fri Mar 05, 2021 9:40 pm
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: Graphing
- Replies: 20
- Views: 1045
Re: Graphing
Not sure if we need to plot but it's important to recognize what order it is if given on a graph.
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 10:36 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: 6L.7
- Replies: 1
- Views: 153
6L.7
I am confused on how to start these 6L.7 Write the half-reactions and devise a galvanic cell (write a cell diagram) to study each of the following reactions (a) AgBr(s)⇌Ag+(aq)+Br−(aq),a solubility equilibrium (b) H+(aq)+OH−(aq)→H2O(l),the Brønsted neutralizationreaction (c) Cd(s)+2Ni(OH)3(s)→Cd(OH)...
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 10:31 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: 6L.5 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 190
6L.5 [ENDORSED]
I am confused for part C. For the half-cell diagram, do we include HCl? The solutions manual does not.
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 10:29 pm
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: 6L.3
- Replies: 1
- Views: 134
6L.3
How do you balance 6L.3 part d? It seems a little confusing to me.
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:13 am
- Forum: Work, Gibbs Free Energy, Cell (Redox) Potentials
- Topic: Gibbs Free Energy Equation and n
- Replies: 13
- Views: 630
Re: Gibbs Free Energy Equation and n
N is the amount of moles of electrons. If one electron is transferred, n is one and if two are transferred, n is two and so on.
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:12 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Anode/Cathode
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1760
Re: Anode/Cathode
Anode is usually on the left and cathode is usually on the right.
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:11 am
- Forum: Balancing Redox Reactions
- Topic: Acidic vs. Basic
- Replies: 20
- Views: 877
Re: Acidic vs. Basic
You can use H+ or H2O for acidic solutions but for basic solutions, you use OH- and H2O
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:11 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Spontaneity and Galvanic Cells
- Replies: 5
- Views: 344
Re: Spontaneity and Galvanic Cells
Positive E indicates that it is spontaneous and negative E indicates that it is not.
- Sat Feb 27, 2021 12:10 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Salt Bridges
- Replies: 41
- Views: 3392
Re: Salt Bridges
It helps maintain neutrality I believe.
- Sat Feb 20, 2021 12:12 am
- Forum: Van't Hoff Equation
- Topic: Delta H naught VS delta H
- Replies: 28
- Views: 2599
Re: Delta H naught VS delta H
Delta H naught is just the specific standard conditions.
- Sat Feb 20, 2021 12:11 am
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using First Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: When does delta H = q?
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5228
Re: When does delta H = q?
It is usually the case with constant pressure.
- Sat Feb 20, 2021 12:10 am
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: unit of w
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1289
Re: unit of w
It's in joules. P is in atm, volume is in liters. You have L*atms and when you multiply by 101.325 (J/L*atm) correct me if I'm wrong, then you get joules.
- Sat Feb 20, 2021 12:08 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Thermodynamically Favorable
- Replies: 27
- Views: 2009
Re: Thermodynamically Favorable
When delta G is negative, it's favorable because of spontaneity.
- Sat Feb 20, 2021 12:07 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Gas Constant R
- Replies: 43
- Views: 4278
Re: Gas Constant R
Depends on what you are trying to find. If joules, use 8.314, if not then you use 0.0821.
- Sat Feb 20, 2021 12:06 am
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: Midterm 2 and Final
- Replies: 25
- Views: 1412
Re: Midterm 2 and Final
I believe so.
- Mon Feb 15, 2021 5:22 pm
- Forum: Van't Hoff Equation
- Topic: Van't Hoff [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 612
Van't Hoff [ENDORSED]
What type of problems do we need to use Van't Hoff equations for?
- Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:54 pm
- Forum: Calculating Standard Reaction Entropies (e.g. , Using Standard Molar Entropies)
- Topic: 4J.13 Question
- Replies: 4
- Views: 255
Re: 4J.13 Question
At a more negative delta G, it tends to form the substance spontaneously because it's more stable, more favorable. So choose those with a negative delta g, those will be the most stable.
- Sun Feb 14, 2021 2:48 pm
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: Midterm 2 Content
- Replies: 18
- Views: 835
Re: Midterm 2 Content
It covers everything up until Friday's lecture I think.
- Fri Feb 12, 2021 1:04 am
- Forum: Gibbs Free Energy Concepts and Calculations
- Topic: Gibbs and Equilbrium constant
- Replies: 3
- Views: 165
Gibbs and Equilbrium constant
How do you relate the two? On Sapling, the last couple problems deal with this.
- Fri Feb 12, 2021 1:02 am
- Forum: Concepts & Calculations Using Second Law of Thermodynamics
- Topic: 4F.9
- Replies: 3
- Views: 233
Re: 4F.9
You use P1/P2 instead because when you do the proportions with P and V, you get
P1V1=P2V2
V2/V1 = P1/P2
P1V1=P2V2
V2/V1 = P1/P2
- Fri Feb 12, 2021 1:01 am
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Sapling #14B W3/4
- Replies: 4
- Views: 258
Re: Sapling #14B W3/4
Since you are dealing with an irreversible problem, you use the external pressure (1.43). Then, you multiply that by the delta V (VF-VI). Finally, you multiply that by 101.325 to go from L*atm to joules.
-p(deltaV) * 101.325
-p(deltaV) * 101.325
- Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:58 am
- Forum: Thermodynamic Definitions (isochoric/isometric, isothermal, isobaric)
- Topic: textbook 4.15
- Replies: 2
- Views: 118
Re: textbook 4.15
This is because when setting q (system) equal to q(surroundings), in this case, the reaction and water, the other side has to be negative.
- Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:55 am
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Textbook problem 4B.13
- Replies: 6
- Views: 324
Re: Textbook problem 4B.13
For irreversible, you always use the external pressure because that is what the system is pushing against.
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:48 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Spontaneous
- Replies: 26
- Views: 1634
Re: Spontaneous
Spontaneous means a reaction can operate on its own without any extra input. To determine spontaneity, delta H would help, but it doesn't tell the full story. You would have to find delta G. In order to do that you would need to have the delta H (enthalpy) minus delta S (entropy) times T(temp).
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:46 pm
- Forum: Calculating Work of Expansion
- Topic: Work notation
- Replies: 10
- Views: 492
Re: Work notation
It is written as a lowercase w. Uppercase is for degeneracy.
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:44 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Definitions (isochoric/isometric, isothermal, isobaric)
- Topic: Adiabatic systems
- Replies: 14
- Views: 840
Re: Adiabatic systems
q will always be zero since there's no heat coming in or out.
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:42 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: R Constant
- Replies: 91
- Views: 8077
Re: R Constant
That is correct. However, when you use the constant to find work (joules), then you use 8.314.
- Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:41 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: Examples for types of systems
- Replies: 8
- Views: 328
Re: Examples for types of systems
An example of an open system is a glass of water. An example of a closed system is an ice pack. An example of an isolated system is a substance in an insulator.
- Thu Feb 04, 2021 6:54 pm
- Forum: Thermodynamic Definitions (isochoric/isometric, isothermal, isobaric)
- Topic: Textbook Problem 4.5
- Replies: 1
- Views: 91
Textbook Problem 4.5
I'm not really sure how to approach this problem 4.5 In 1750, Joseph Black performed an experiment that eventually led to the discovery of enthalpies of fusion. He placed two samples of water, each of mass 150 g, at 0.00 °C (one ice and one liquid) in a room kept at a constant temperature of 5.00°C....
- Sun Jan 31, 2021 11:09 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: is HClO3 weak or strong? [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 49
- Views: 4860
Re: is HClO3 weak or strong? [ENDORSED]
I believe it's one of the strong acids.
- Sun Jan 31, 2021 11:08 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Taking the Anti-Log
- Replies: 37
- Views: 2820
Re: Taking the Anti-Log
You would do 10 to the negative pka (that dictates the exponent)
10^(-pka)
10^(-pka)
- Sun Jan 31, 2021 10:52 am
- Forum: Thermodynamic Systems (Open, Closed, Isolated)
- Topic: isolated system
- Replies: 9
- Views: 351
Re: isolated system
I would assume no energy change is occurring because nothing can go in or out of the system.
- Thu Jan 28, 2021 11:24 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Value for energy released
- Replies: 1
- Views: 124
Value for energy released
UA Worksheet: The value of ΔH for this reaction is -1107 kJ: 2Ba(s) + O (g) → 2BaO(s) How many kJ of heat are released when 5.75 g of BaO (s) is produced? When asking how many kJ of heat released, do you put the answer as a negative sign or positive sign? I know if it asks for the change in enthalp...
- Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:27 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: K for stability [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 105
K for stability [ENDORSED]
I know if 10^-3 < K < 10^3, you can't determine if reactant or product is favored. Is that case for stability for products vs. reactants? Like if k falls between these numbers, are you unable to determine if the products or reactants are more stable?
- Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:22 am
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Effect of Pressure (contraction) in reaction
- Replies: 8
- Views: 373
Effect of Pressure (contraction) in reaction
If there are zero moles on one side of the reaction (solid only) and you compress the system, does the reaction shift to that side or does it not (because the solid does not contribute to equilibrium)?
Example
A(s) --> B (aq) + C (g)
Example
A(s) --> B (aq) + C (g)
- Wed Jan 27, 2021 12:18 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Enthapies for Reaction units [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 122
Enthapies for Reaction units [ENDORSED]
Is the overall delta H of a reaction in kJs or kj/mol?
- Mon Jan 25, 2021 5:38 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Favorability/Stability of Products or Reactants at K
- Replies: 2
- Views: 172
Favorability/Stability of Products or Reactants at K
Is there a 10^-3 -10^3 cutoff for favorability/stability of products or reactants in a reaction? Like if the k falls in between those values, are neither products nor reactants favored?
- Sun Jan 24, 2021 8:41 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: 6.19
- Replies: 1
- Views: 107
6.19
How are we supposed to approach this? Hemoglobin (Hb) molecules in blood carry O2 molecules from the lungs, where the concentration of oxygen is high, to the tissues where it is low (see the Interlude following Focus 5). In the tissues the equilibrium H3O+(aq) + HbO2−(aq) ⇌ HHb(aq) + H2O(l) + O2(aq)...
- Sat Jan 23, 2021 6:23 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Le Chatlier (solids)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 130
Le Chatlier (solids)
Would the reaction not shift to the left (more A made) if you add the amount of substance B because solids aren't part of equilibrium constant?
A(s) --> B (g) + C(aq)
A(s) --> B (g) + C(aq)
- Sat Jan 23, 2021 5:47 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Standard State Elements
- Replies: 5
- Views: 186
Standard State Elements
Beside diatomic molecules and graphite carbon, how do we know if an element is in its standard state?
- Sat Jan 23, 2021 12:04 am
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Elements Not in standard state
- Replies: 5
- Views: 180
Elements Not in standard state
When given a reaction, how do we deal with an element not in its standard state?
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 10:23 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Phase Change
- Replies: 2
- Views: 202
Phase Change
For the calculating the enthalpy of formations, how do we account for phase changes? Are there times where we look at the table of enthalpies of an element and have to account for phase changes (add or subtract)? Or do we just look at the molecule and the phase it is and use it straight up?
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 1:02 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: 4D.23
- Replies: 2
- Views: 187
4D.23
We are given two equations to find the enthalpy of formation for dinitrogen pentoxide. How come we multiply the bottom equation (with N2O5 as a product) by half and not the top by 2 order to cancel out the intermediate NO2s? Also, how do we do the second part (and from the standard enthalpy of forma...
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 12:59 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: 4D.15
- Replies: 1
- Views: 79
4D.15
How come we don't multiple the last combustion equation by 2 based on the coefficients? Is it because you can use half coefficients for Hess's Law?
H2 + O2--> H2O
H2 + O2--> H2O
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 12:56 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Textbook 4D.11 Part B
- Replies: 2
- Views: 169
Re: Textbook 4D.11 Part B
The gas constant you use depends on the units given. In this case, you use 0.0821.
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 12:54 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: steam causing burns
- Replies: 40
- Views: 1521
Re: steam causing burns
Even though steam may have the same temperature as liquid, there is more heat in the system because bonds are being broken. According to the graph, when heat is being transferred to the skin, steam has more energy to release than liquid. This is why it hurts more when you have hot steam.
- Fri Jan 22, 2021 12:53 pm
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Endothermic vs Exothermic Stabilities
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3897
Re: Endothermic vs Exothermic Stabilities
You are correct. Exothermic reactions where things that go to a lower energy state are generally more stable. Endothermic is vice versa. If elements go to a higher energy state, they are generally less stable.
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 10:58 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: When x is negligible in Equilibrium constant
- Replies: 34
- Views: 1704
Re: When x is negligible in Equilibrium constant
It has to be 10^-4 or smaller, but you can always check using the 5% rule. If x is less than 5% of initial, the approximation is valid.
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 10:53 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: pH of conjugate acid/base
- Replies: 3
- Views: 240
pH of conjugate acid/base
Once we calculate the pH of a certain substance, do we need to know how to calculate the pH of its conjugate. Is it like pka and kb where subtracting 14 from the ph gives you the ph of its conjugate?
- Fri Jan 15, 2021 6:06 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: 6D1 - tables?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 149
Re: 6D1 - tables?
I think it tells you to refer to them.
- Thu Jan 14, 2021 2:00 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: 6D.15
- Replies: 1
- Views: 64
6D.15
6D.15
Calculate the pH of
(a) 0.19 M NH4Cl(aq) (b) 0.055 M AlCl3 (aq).
How are we supposed to know if AlCl3 is an acid or a base?
Calculate the pH of
(a) 0.19 M NH4Cl(aq) (b) 0.055 M AlCl3 (aq).
How are we supposed to know if AlCl3 is an acid or a base?
- Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:52 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Increase in Pressure
- Replies: 31
- Views: 908
Increase in Pressure
For increases in pressure (decreases in volume), the reaction goes toward the side with less moles. When finding out which side has the least amount of moles, do you also include aqueous solutions or only gases?
- Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:49 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: [H30+]=[OH-] ???
- Replies: 8
- Views: 368
Re: [H30+]=[OH-] ???
Since it's neutral, you can assume these concentrations are equal. Therefore, you can assign the same variable (x). You do that, square root every side and you get 1 * 10^-7.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 12:06 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: H2O as a Gas
- Replies: 69
- Views: 7419
Re: H2O as a Gas
Normally, you would exclude it. But if it's a gas, you put it in the ICE Table. Anything that isn't a solid or liquid is included.
- Tue Jan 12, 2021 12:05 am
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Q and K
- Replies: 46
- Views: 1979
Re: Q and K
Yes, Q is any time. You would measure Q at that moment to determine the direction of the reaction.
If Q<K, the reaction is going right; more products are made
If Q>K, the reaction is going left; more reactants are made
If Q<K, the reaction is going right; more products are made
If Q>K, the reaction is going left; more reactants are made
- Sun Jan 10, 2021 8:52 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Removing product
- Replies: 5
- Views: 436
Re: Removing product
If you remove the product then you lower the Q at that moment. Since Q (the reaction quotient) is lower, it will make more product to get back to the level desired.
- Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:51 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: concentration or partial pressure
- Replies: 7
- Views: 360
Re: concentration or partial pressure
I don't think you have to convert unless it asked for Kp. You can use the concentrations for this case.
- Tue Jan 05, 2021 12:01 am
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: 1A module #18
- Replies: 5
- Views: 207
Re: 1A module #18
Since it's k, it's the equilibrium concentration. If it was asking for q, then it would be for the initial concentrations.
- Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:56 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Converting to Concentration and Pressure Values
- Replies: 7
- Views: 590
Re: Converting to Concentration and Pressure Values
P= pressure of the gas (atm)
V= volume of gas (L)
n= number of moles
r= gas constant
T= Temp (Kelvin)
V= volume of gas (L)
n= number of moles
r= gas constant
T= Temp (Kelvin)
- Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:53 pm
- Forum: Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations
- Topic: Kc favoring products
- Replies: 10
- Views: 594
Re: Kc favoring products
You are correct; even though 61 seems like a big number, you can only conclude that it favors products when it's 10^3 and above and reactants when it's 10^-3 and below.
- Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:50 pm
- Forum: Non-Equilibrium Conditions & The Reaction Quotient
- Topic: Qc vs Kc
- Replies: 15
- Views: 5499
Re: Qc vs Kc
When Qc is more than Kc, reactants would be formed to get that ratio back to equilibrium.
When Qc is less than Kc, products would be formed to get the ratio up to equilbrium.
When they are equal, it's at equilibrium.
When Qc is less than Kc, products would be formed to get the ratio up to equilbrium.
When they are equal, it's at equilibrium.
- Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:48 pm
- Forum: Ideal Gases
- Topic: Kc vs Kp
- Replies: 109
- Views: 5574
Re: Kc vs Kp
You use Kc when having the molar concentrations of the particles and Kp for when given the pressures (I think only gases have kp values).
- Mon Jan 04, 2021 11:46 pm
- Forum: Applying Le Chatelier's Principle to Changes in Chemical & Physical Conditions
- Topic: Temperature/Pressure Effect on Equilibirum (Le Chatlier)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 330
Temperature/Pressure Effect on Equilibirum (Le Chatlier)
Why does the increasing/decreasing of temperature affect the Keq value. Also, why does changing the pressure make the reaction favor the side with more or less moles, depending on how you change it?