Search found 23 matches
- Mon Mar 13, 2017 8:15 am
- Forum: *Alcohols
- Topic: Functional groups
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2001
Re: Functional groups
I believe only the functional groups listed in the course reader will need to be known. Dr. Lavelle didn't emphasize the other ones (like thioether and phenol). Hope this helps.
- Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:53 am
- Forum: *Organic Reaction Mechanisms in General
- Topic: SN2 Reactions
- Replies: 2
- Views: 539
Re: SN2 Reactions
Yeah, SN2 reactions stand for bimolecular nucleophilic substitution reactions. A nucleophile from somewhere else will replace the nucleophile that is already on the molecule. I think that the pattern usually involves the "original" nucleophile breaking off because of its negative polarity ...
- Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:22 am
- Forum: *Alkanes and Substituted Alkanes (Staggered, Eclipsed, Gauche, Anti, Newman Projections)
- Topic: question about nucleophile and electrophile
- Replies: 2
- Views: 504
Re: question about nucleophile and electrophile
To tentatively answer your first question, I think that the size of the compound does affect how readily electrons are donated/accepted? Take, for example, F- and Br-. If you were to compare which one of these elements is the stronger nucleophile, you would see that Br- is larger and thus has higher...
- Mon Feb 20, 2017 10:37 am
- Forum: General Rate Laws
- Topic: Unique rate of reaction
- Replies: 2
- Views: 576
Re: Unique rate of reaction
I've been trying to decipher the distinction between the average reaction rate and the unique average rate. On pg. 612-613, the book says that the average reaction rate is defined as average rate of consumption of R = - Δ[R]/Δt On the other hand, the book says that the unique average rate of reactio...
- Mon Feb 13, 2017 7:52 am
- Forum: Entropy Changes Due to Changes in Volume and Temperature
- Topic: 2015 midterm
- Replies: 1
- Views: 448
Re: 2015 midterm
In this question, you are essentially separating the entropy into two calculations: one involving only volume change at constant temperature, and the other involving only temperature change at constant volume. You have to always hold one of the variables constant in order to solve for the other vari...
- Mon Feb 06, 2017 8:01 am
- Forum: Galvanic/Voltaic Cells, Calculating Standard Cell Potentials, Cell Diagrams
- Topic: Example 14.8
- Replies: 2
- Views: 507
Re: Example 14.8
I think that, for the most part, you just reverse the reaction that would, when you add up the E naught values, give you a positive E naught value. You would want the E naught to be positive, which would indicate that the overall reaction is spontaneous.
- Mon Jan 30, 2017 8:04 am
- Forum: Reaction Enthalpies (e.g., Using Hess’s Law, Bond Enthalpies, Standard Enthalpies of Formation)
- Topic: Hess's Law
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1023
Re: Hess's Law
To add on, I would say that you would want to always refer back to your "goal" equation. Compare your "goal" equation to the equations that are given to you, and, as aforementioned in the previous comments, multiply the equations by a coefficient that will ensure that you end up ...
- Mon Jan 23, 2017 10:37 am
- Forum: Calculating Standard Reaction Entropies (e.g. , Using Standard Molar Entropies)
- Topic: Positional/Residual Entropy
- Replies: 1
- Views: 472
Re: Positional/Residual Entropy
To my understanding, positional/residual entropy is calculated as the absolute entropy (the equation, I think, was derived through molecular/statistical analysis). The equation for absolute entropy is S=Kb*lnW. On the other hand, I think that the "regular entropy" that you are talking abou...
- Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:56 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: heating curve
- Replies: 3
- Views: 656
Re: heating curve
It is because all of the heat during the phase change (i.e. from solid to liquid) is going into converting the solid to a liquid. In the case of water, the heat is being used to break the hydrogen bonds (to be more specific on which bonds are being broken). That is why temperature remains constant.
- Mon Jan 09, 2017 7:24 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Burns Worse from Steam Than Water Example
- Replies: 2
- Views: 856
Re: Burns Worse from Steam Than Water Example
Yes. The heat released from steam is the sum of the heat released during the phase change from gas to liquid (as represented by the second horizontal line on a heating curve of water) and the heat released during the cooling of liquid water. This sum is much larger than merely the heat released duri...
- Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:46 pm
- Forum: *Molecular Orbital Theory (Bond Order, Diamagnetism, Paramagnetism)
- Topic: Heteronuclear Diatomic Molecules
- Replies: 2
- Views: 662
Re: Heteronuclear Diatomic Molecules
I think the rule is that for Z<8, the pi orbitals are lower in energy than the sigma orbitals, but for Z greater than or equal to 8, the pi orbitals are higher in energy than the sigma orbitals.
- Mon Nov 21, 2016 8:32 am
- Forum: Calculating pH or pOH for Strong & Weak Acids & Bases
- Topic: Is a negative pH possible? [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 782
Re: Is a negative pH possible? [ENDORSED]
No, the pH scale only goes from 0 to 14. When you take the negative log of a number between 10^-14 and 1 (which I think are the range of values you are going to be dealing with), you will always get a positive pH.
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 11:39 am
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: Coordination Number for (en) [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2922
Re: Coordination Number for (en) [ENDORSED]
Do molecules/anions outside the coordination sphere contribute to the compound's coordination number? For example, for [Cu(NH3)4]SO4.H2O, is the coordination number 4 (since each NH3 is monodentate and there are four of them), or is the coordination number 6 (including the SO4 and H2O)?
- Mon Nov 14, 2016 9:05 am
- Forum: Shape, Structure, Coordination Number, Ligands
- Topic: Naming Chemical Compounds
- Replies: 2
- Views: 592
Re: Naming Chemical Compounds
I think it is also important to note that a polydentate ligand can have multiple bonds with the central cation. Take for example (en) and (dien). I think one will have to count (en) as 2 bonds and (dien) as 3 bonds, since (en) is bidentate and (dien) is tridentate.
- Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:56 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: order of ligand names [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1670
Re: order of ligand names [ENDORSED]
I think that for H2O, it is already implied/understood that the oxygen (not the hydrogen) is bonded to the central cation, so writing it either way (as H2O or OH2) is fine, although I think it is better to write it as OH2. In other words, there is only one possible way for the water to bond to the c...
- Mon Nov 07, 2016 8:15 am
- Forum: Naming
- Topic: order of ligand names [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1670
Re: order of ligand names [ENDORSED]
The NC ligand suggests that the nitrogen (N) is bonded to the central cation. However, the CN ligand suggests that the carbon (C) is bonded to the central cation.
- Mon Oct 31, 2016 7:47 am
- Forum: Determining Molecular Shape (VSEPR)
- Topic: What is Angular? And what is T-shaped?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 882
Re: What is Angular? And what is T-shaped?
I'd like to add on to the definition of an angular/bent molecule.
The central atom of a bent molecule can have either 1 or 2 lone pairs.
The trick is when there are 3 lone pairs. In the case of 3 lone pairs, the molecule becomes linear.
The central atom of a bent molecule can have either 1 or 2 lone pairs.
The trick is when there are 3 lone pairs. In the case of 3 lone pairs, the molecule becomes linear.
- Mon Oct 24, 2016 7:59 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Homework #3.97
- Replies: 2
- Views: 598
Re: Homework #3.97
I think that drawing diagonal bonds is the only way to satisfy the condition that 1 P atom is connected to 3 other P atoms. But I think that you could also draw it like NH3. Put 1 P atom in the center and the 3 P atoms symmetrically around it. The only added step would be to connect all of the outer...
- Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:03 am
- Forum: Lewis Structures
- Topic: Ionization Energy
- Replies: 1
- Views: 505
Re: Ionization Energy
As for determining the exact ionization energy level of each element, I don't know if such a task is within or beyond the scope of this course. These are the general trends for ionization energy. As you go across a period , the ionization energy generally increases . The exceptions for this periodic...
- Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:08 pm
- Forum: Limiting Reactant Calculations
- Topic: Limiting Reactant [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 763
Re: Limiting Reactant [ENDORSED]
Another way of doing this problem is to take one of the reactants and calculate the required amount of the second reactant using a mole ratio. (22.4g NH3/17.03g mol^-1 NH3) = 1.32 mol NH3 40.5g O2/32.00g mol^-1 O2) = 1.27 mol O2 Let's take 1.32 mol NH3 and multiply it by the mole ratio, 5 mol O2/4 m...
- Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:48 am
- Forum: Bohr Frequency Condition, H-Atom , Atomic Spectroscopy
- Topic: 1.57 [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2168
Re: 1.57 [ENDORSED]
For the Balmer series, the final energy level is always n=2. So, the wavelengths 653.6, 486.1, 434.0, and 410.2 nm correspond to n=3, n=4, n=5, and n=6 respectively. Since the last wavelength, 410.2 nm, corresponds to n=6, the next wavelength should logically correspond to n=7. To solve for the wave...
- Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:37 pm
- Forum: Molarity, Solutions, Dilutions
- Topic: Question on Molarity and Dilution of a Solution: Post-Module Assessment
- Replies: 1
- Views: 654
Re: Question on Molarity and Dilution of a Solution: Post-Module Assessment
For this solution, I am not going to use M1V1=M2V2. I am just going to be using dimensional analysis, which should generate the same answer. First, convert grams to moles. Preferably in the same step, divide the moles by liters to get M (molarity). (5.00g KMnO4 x (1 mol KMnO4/158.04g KMnO4))/0.15000...
- Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:26 pm
- Forum: Empirical & Molecular Formulas
- Topic: Assessment Question #9
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3504
Re: Assessment Question #9
First Step: Divide all the gram values by 8.00 g and multiply them by 100. 3.27g/8.00g x 100 = 40.9% C 0.366g/8.00g x 100 = 4.58% H 4.37g/8.00g x 100 = 54.6% O Second Step: Change the percentages to grams. Convert the new values in grams to moles. 40.9g C x (1 mol C/12.01g C) = 3.41 mol C 4.58g H x ...