Search found 8 matches
Search found 8 matches • Page 1 of 1
- Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:33 pm
- Forum: *Cycloalkenes
- Topic: Self test 1.11A question b
- Replies: 1
- Views: 308
The answer says that the name of the cycloalkene is 1,6-Dimethylcyclohexa-1,4-diene. I don't understand why they numbered their carbons in the counter-clockwise direction. Wouldn't counting clockwise be favored because of the functional groups attached to the ring?
- Tue Feb 21, 2017 11:07 pm
- Forum: Administrative Questions and Class Announcements
- Topic: Quiz 2 Winter 2017
- Replies: 160
- Views: 17882
For number 5 wouldn't a lower activation energy make the rate of reaction more sensitive to an increase in temperature? because not as much thermal energy is needed to get the reaction going? Can someone clarify? thanks
- Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:08 pm
- Forum: First Order Reactions
- Topic: fractional reaction order [ENDORSED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1225
Page 621 in the book gives an example in which a reaction has a fractional order; they don't really go into too much detail about why, can anyone explain?
- Sun Jan 22, 2017 10:58 pm
- Forum: Heat Capacities, Calorimeters & Calorimetry Calculations
- Topic: Heat Capacity of Gases
- Replies: 2
- Views: 455
Will we be given the different Cv and Cp values on the midterm?
- Sun Jan 15, 2017 9:13 pm
- Forum: Phase Changes & Related Calculations
- Topic: Enthalpy of Sublimation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 478
According to the book, enthalpy of sublimation must be equal to the sum of the enthalpies of fusion and vaporization? However, the book also says that it is equal to the enthalpy of the vapor minus the enthalpy of the solid. Can someone explain this?