Priority for Trans vs. Equatorial

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Joslyn_Santana_2B
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:58 pm

Priority for Trans vs. Equatorial

Postby Joslyn_Santana_2B » Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:38 pm

Is it a rule that equatorial is prioritized over trans when choosing the most stable conformation for cyclohexanes?
I had made it trans, making the Chloro equatorial down, and the methyl axial up.
Attachments
Screen Shot 2017-03-18 at 2.37.16 PM.png

Chem_Mod
Posts: 23858
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
Has upvoted: 1253 times

Re: Priority for Trans vs. Equatorial

Postby Chem_Mod » Sat Mar 18, 2017 3:09 pm

With two substituents, the cyclohexane conformation that is most stable is the one in which both substituents are in the equatorial position as the two substituents will be the furthest apart.


Return to “*Cyclohexanes (Chair, Boat, Geometric Isomers)”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests