Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:36 pm
Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
I was wondering what the usual cutoff point for rounding up empirical formulas is. For example, if the final moles of a compound containing C,H, and O are 2.67,2.67, and 1 you would multiply by 3, but what about numbers like 2.85,2.85, and 1, or any other variant for that matter.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:43 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
Usually if I find that I am getting numbers around the "0.80" range, then I realize something might be wrong. Generally the problems are set up so we do not run into these issues. I usually go back and check my rounding if my numbers aren't in the "recognizable" decimal range (i.e. 0.99, 0.33, 0.67)
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:01 pm
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
You aren't necessarily wrong if you are getting numbers like .8 or .2. It just means you have to plug in different numbers until you find a whole-number multiple. for example, a number with .8 can be multiplied by 5 to equal 4
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:35 pm
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
Echoing what Katherine said, generally, you shouldn't have to round. Try to avoid rounding in any steps of the problem to retain the highest accuracy of a final answer. That way, when you reach your final answer and you have .8 or .2, you know that it's not an issue with accuracy and instead you need to find a factor to multiply each number by to reach a set of whole numbers.
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2020 12:17 am
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
If you are having trouble finding a factor to multipy a decimal by, you might want to try writing it as a fraction over 100, simplifying it, and multiplying all of your moles by the lowest common denominator.
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:40 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
I'd like to confirm what Sedge wrote! I agree with that approach. Good luck!
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:40 pm
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
Confirming what many other students have posted, but you should not round until the final answer, I typically use 4-5 numbers to the right of the decimal if they are present and then round once I get to my final answer according to what the question requires.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:37 pm
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
I think that Reva's approach would be the best when you are having trouble finding a number to multiply your empirical formula by. It will ensure that you are getting the lowest ratio of whole numbers for your formula. However, you would usually be fine just multiplying your formula by different numbers until you get values that are above the 0.9 range of certainty.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
Hi, I agree with what Xavier said about 0.9 being a good threshold for rounding up. I am wondering if the same could be said for rounding down? For example, if your answer ends in .01-0.1, is that close enough to round down?
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:56 pm
Re: Rounding up for Empirical Formulas?
Emma Strassner 2D wrote:Hi, I agree with what Xavier said about 0.9 being a good threshold for rounding up. I am wondering if the same could be said for rounding down? For example, if your answer ends in .01-0.1, is that close enough to round down?
Yes, I believe so. I agree with 0.9 being close enough to round up. By that rational a number from 0.01-0.1 is close enough to round down.
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:50 pm
Return to “Empirical & Molecular Formulas”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests