Need help on question M.9 for chem 14a

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

OliverPark1C
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:00 am

Need help on question M.9 for chem 14a

Postby OliverPark1C » Wed Sep 30, 2015 5:45 pm

Hey I need help figuring out the question:
Copper (II) nitrate reacts with sodium hydroxide to produce a precipitate of light blue copper(II) hydroxide. (a) Write the net ionic equation for the reaction. (b) Calculate the maximum mass of copper(II) hydroxide that can be formed when 2.00 g of sodium hydroxide is added to 80.0 mL of 0.500 M Cu(NO3)2(aq).
Thanks!

Allison Yoon 3B
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:00 am

Re: Need help on question M.9 for chem 14a

Postby Allison Yoon 3B » Wed Sep 30, 2015 7:27 pm

First of all, you need to write the net ionic equation. In a net ionic equation, you do not need to include the spectator ions. So, in this case, you do not need to include NO3 and Na. That means, in the end, the net ionic equation, will be Cu2+ + 2(OH)- yields Cu(OH)2. Cu2+ and 2(OH)- are both aqueous while Cu(OH)2 are solid. In part b), you need to find the grams of Cu(OH)2 that can be formed. Because you are given the molarity of Cu(NO3)2, you will need to use c=m/v to find the number of mols of Cu(NO3)2 that are present. After plugging everything in, you will find that there are .04 mols of Cu(NO3)2. (C stands for Molarity and V stands for volume in liters.) You are also given the grams of NaOH. Use the molar mass of NaOH to find the number of mols of NaOH. There are .05 mols of NaOH present. It becomes evident that NaOH is the limiting reactant because there is a 2 to 1 ratio between Cu2+ and 2(OH)-. You use the 2:1 ratio between 2(OH)- and Cu(OH)2 to find out that .025 mols of Cu(OH)2 will be formed. You use the molar mass of Cu(OH)2 to find the grams of Cu(OH)2 that are formed. In this case, that will be 2.44 g of Cu(OH)2.

Kendall 3H
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:18 am

Re: Need help on question M.9 for chem 14a

Postby Kendall 3H » Mon Oct 07, 2019 10:04 pm

Thank you so much! I was very confused on this question and you explained it so well. I now see that you must first discover which reactant is the limiting reactant and then the problem becomes much more simple.

LBacker_2E
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:21 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: Need help on question M.9 for chem 14a

Postby LBacker_2E » Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:30 pm

In general, when you are writing a net ionic equation (like in this problem), how do you know which ions are spectator ions? Since some of the ions are going to be spectator ions, do those ions still need to be balanced on both sides of the equation?

Jack Riley 4f
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:17 am

Re: Need help on question M.9 for chem 14a

Postby Jack Riley 4f » Wed Oct 09, 2019 4:34 pm

To determine if an ion is a spectator ion you just need to look at the product that is stated in the problem. In this problem the product is copper(ii) hydroxide so you know that the sodium and nitrate are the spectators. Because they are spectators, they don't need to be balanced because they exist in the same form on both sides of the equation.

Katie 3H
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:36 am

Re: Need help on question M.9 for chem 14a

Postby Katie 3H » Sun Oct 17, 2021 4:04 pm

Hey! I don't understand how you found the limiting reactant. I know we had to create an net ionic equation, but don't we need a regular equation to find out the mole ratios ?

Tammy Shen 2L
Posts: 104
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2021 7:08 am

Re: Need help on question M.9 for chem 14a

Postby Tammy Shen 2L » Thu Oct 21, 2021 9:16 pm

405736772 wrote:Hey! I don't understand how you found the limiting reactant. I know we had to create an net ionic equation, but don't we need a regular equation to find out the mole ratios ?


It shouldn't matter whether or not we use the net ionic equation or the regular equation. They used the net ionic equation because that's what's asked in part A. But it doesn't matter because the net ionic equation only omits the spectator ions, or compounds that would have a 1:1 ratio anyway.


Return to “Limiting Reactant Calculations”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests