Sapling #18


Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

lwon Dis2I
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:37 pm

Sapling #18

Postby lwon Dis2I » Sun Feb 14, 2021 6:00 pm

For Sapling #18, how do you mathematically get rid of the ln of ln(K)?

Sahaj Patel Lec3DisK
Posts: 130
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:03 pm
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Sahaj Patel Lec3DisK » Sun Feb 14, 2021 6:02 pm

You raise it to e! just like to get rid of -log you raised it to 10, you raise the ln() to e. Hope this helps!

SainehaMaddineni_3I
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:39 pm
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: Sapling #18

Postby SainehaMaddineni_3I » Sun Feb 14, 2021 6:03 pm

First isolate ln(K) to one side. Then, to get K, you should do e^(whatever is on the other side).

Here's an example of how to do it with some random numbers:
ln(x) = 2.3/4
x = e^(2.3/4)

Victoria Dao 3G
Posts: 100
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:50 pm

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Victoria Dao 3G » Sun Feb 14, 2021 6:19 pm

Hi! Ln is just log base e, so to get rid of it, just place whatever's on the opposite side of the equivalence sign as the power of e. Hope this helps!

OwenSumter_2F
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:57 pm
Been upvoted: 2 times

Re: Sapling #18

Postby OwenSumter_2F » Wed Feb 17, 2021 10:15 am

It was strange to me when I did it and got a very large number, but trust your gut for the math and you should be good! :)

Katelynn Shaheen 2C
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2019 12:18 am

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Katelynn Shaheen 2C » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:55 pm

Raise it to the power of e like you would do for logs.

Mary Shih 3J
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:39 pm

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Mary Shih 3J » Fri Feb 19, 2021 5:34 pm

you neutralize the lnk by using e! so if lnk=2 then it will e^2

Jordan Tatang 3L
Posts: 125
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:31 pm
Been upvoted: 3 times

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Jordan Tatang 3L » Fri Feb 19, 2021 6:24 pm

e^ln k cancels out the natural log and you're left with k.

AustinMcBrideDis3L
Posts: 105
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:39 pm

Re: Sapling #18

Postby AustinMcBrideDis3L » Fri Feb 19, 2021 7:27 pm

If you want to solve for what's inside the ln you need to take the reverse function of it: like diving is the reverse of multiplying, and - is to +.
The reverse of ln is e so make both sides of the equation e^ln(X)=e^#you get. This should help you solve it!

Nishka Vipul 1J
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 12:18 am

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Nishka Vipul 1J » Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:16 pm

Hello,

For this one, you raise e to the value given for lnK. For example if lnK = 200 then K = e^200.

Hope this helps!

Astha Sahoo 3I
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:52 pm
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Astha Sahoo 3I » Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:32 pm

I would take the constant inside of the ln (like 40 if it was ln40) and then raise e to that power!

Pranav Daggubati 3C
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:35 pm

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Pranav Daggubati 3C » Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:35 pm

First, Isolate the ln term and then take e to the power of that that ln(x) equals to get x

Sophia Kalanski 1A
Posts: 112
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:01 pm
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: Sapling #18

Postby Sophia Kalanski 1A » Sun Feb 21, 2021 7:38 pm

raise it to the power of e!


Return to “Van't Hoff Equation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests