How come when figuring out the reaction E, we don’t manipulate the potentials?
For example, for homework problem 14.11, the question involves the half reactions oh Ni(s) + 2e- —> Ni with E = -0.23V and Ag+ + e- —> Ag with E = +0.80V.
In order to make the reaction, we must reverse the first reaction and multiply the second reaction by 2. However, we don’t manipulate their reaction potentials. Why?
Thanks.
Reaction E [ENDORSED]
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:01 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Reaction E
This is because the E potential does not change. Its sign never changes, because potential doesn't change even if the reaction is reversed.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:00 am
Re: Reaction E
E values are intensive properties, meaning that their values don't scale with the other components of the reaction
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:04 am
- Been upvoted: 2 times
Re: Reaction E
Like density, cell potential is an intensive property. This means that cell potential does not depend on the amount of substance present, so even if you multiply your chemical reaction by a coefficient in order to balance the half reactions, you do not need to do anything to change the cell potential of each half reactions.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:00 am
Re: Reaction E [ENDORSED]
E is an intensive property, meaning we do not need to manipulate it or multiply it by stoichiometric coefficients.
Return to “Balancing Redox Reactions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests