Can someone do a detailed walkthrough of how to do this problem? I keep getting the wrong answer :(
7A.13) In the reaction CH Br(aq) 1 OH2(aq) S CH OH(aq) 1 33
Br2(aq), when the OH2 concentration alone was doubled, the rate doubled; when the CH3Br concentration alone was increased by a factor of 1.2, the rate increased by a factor of 1.2. Write the rate law for the reaction.
Hw 7A.13
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 23858
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
- Has upvoted: 1253 times
Re: Hw 7A.13
When you increased each reactant separately, the rate of the reaction increased by the same factor. Therefore, both reactants are raised to the first power in the rate law.
-
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 12:16 am
Re: Hw 7A.13
So the rate law would be based off of if each reactant is a first, second, or zero order reactant. Based from the info, you can infer that both reactants are first order because as you increase their concentration by a constant, the rate also increases by the same amount. therefore it would be k[CH3Br][OH-]=rate
Re: Hw 7A.13
kennedyp wrote:Can someone do a detailed walkthrough of how to do this problem? I keep getting the wrong answer :(
7A.13) In the reaction CH Br(aq) 1 OH2(aq) S CH OH(aq) 1 33
Br2(aq), when the OH2 concentration alone was doubled, the rate doubled; when the CH3Br concentration alone was increased by a factor of 1.2, the rate increased by a factor of 1.2. Write the rate law for the reaction.
So if you increase one reactant by a certain factor and the rate is also increased by that factor, that means it is first order.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2019 12:17 am
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 12:17 am
Re: Hw 7A.13
so if both are first order independently, does this make the reaction an overall 2nd order reaction?
-
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:16 am
Re: Hw 7A.13
yes, since when both concentrations of both reactants are doubled, this results in a doubling of the overall rate, both reactants are first order independently. Thus, when adding together n and m from k[A]^n[B]^m, 1+1=2, so it is overall a second-order reaction.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 12:17 am
Re: Hw 7A.13
in the homework there were some reactions (7A and 7B) that were larger than second order. We don't need to know much about these (like how to graph them), right?
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 12:17 am
Re: Hw 7A.13
in the homework there were some reactions (7A and 7B) that were larger than second order. We don't need to know much about these (like how to graph them), right?
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:52 am
Re: Hw 7A.13
Hi! The way you would approach this problem is to find out the order of each individual reactant. Since the change in rate is proportional to the change in concentration, you know that both reactants are first-order. Hope this helps!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests