Log vs ln


Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

nathansalce 3e
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:01 am

Log vs ln

Postby nathansalce 3e » Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:42 pm

When solving first order reactions, when is it best to use the default ln in the equation, and when is it best to convert ln into log using its 2.303 conversion?

Vincent Tse 1K
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Vincent Tse 1K » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:04 am

I don't really see a real need to convert to log, unless that makes the problem easier/more convenient. You should get the same answer either way if you're doing it right! Whatever's more convenient for you and your calculator/head, I suppose.

Kelly Seto 2J
Posts: 30
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:00 am

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Kelly Seto 2J » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:38 am

I would think it's always preferable to use ln since the first order reaction integrated rate law is based on the exponential decay equation that uses e

Yu Chong 2H
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Yu Chong 2H » Fri Mar 09, 2018 5:59 pm

Use ln, ln is used in the integrated law for a reason because it makes life easier for you. If you convert it to log then you 'll go through an extra step that you never needed to do in the first place.

Oscar Valdovinos 1I
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Oscar Valdovinos 1I » Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:08 pm

There is no need to convert ln into log, and this could cause an answer to be wrong if you ever need to get rid of ln. Since e^ln cancels out smoothly the finding the reaction constant or time is made easier. In short, stick with ln

Veronica Rasmusen 2B
Posts: 49
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:01 am

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Veronica Rasmusen 2B » Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:39 pm

There aren't really any cases log will be more convenient than ln, so just stick with natural log as it will always be more simple.

Yeyang Zu 2J
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:06 am

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Yeyang Zu 2J » Sun Mar 11, 2018 1:38 pm

Since you can get the answer in both ways so that I don't see a real need to convert ln to log. If it makes calculation easier for you, then it is o.

Shanmitha Arun 1L
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:04 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Shanmitha Arun 1L » Sun Mar 11, 2018 1:41 pm

There wouldn't be any cases where you would need to use log. It's usually easiest to go by the given equation.

Shreya Ramineni 2L
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Shreya Ramineni 2L » Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:07 pm

There isn't a need to convert from ln to log, especially because when integrated, the first order reaction provides ln.

Tiffany 1B
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am

Re: Log vs ln

Postby Tiffany 1B » Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:45 pm

Yeah, I think you should just go with given equation. If you convert, you're adding an additional step where you could potentially introduce error.


Return to “First Order Reactions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests