15.63
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:00 am
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:01 am
Re: 15.63
The .59 comes from the Ea/R(1/T1-1/T2) calculation where Ea=38kJ/mol T1=298K and T2=310K while on the other side of the equation ln(k2/k1) where k1=1.5x10^10.
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:00 am
Re: 15.63
I had the same question, I'm wondering how they were able to derive that from the arrhenius equation
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:01 am
Re: 15.63
The derivation for this equation is on page 642 in the textbook but in summary you use the Arrhenius equation at one temperature and at another and subtract the first equation from the second equation getting rid of the lnA.
At T1 : lnk1=lnA-Ea/RT1
At T2: lnk2= lnA-Ea/RT2
The subtraction after further simplification results in ln(k1/k2)=(Ea/RT)(1/T1-1/T2).
At T1 : lnk1=lnA-Ea/RT1
At T2: lnk2= lnA-Ea/RT2
The subtraction after further simplification results in ln(k1/k2)=(Ea/RT)(1/T1-1/T2).
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:00 am
Re: 15.63
Assuming the other posts about this are correct, the solutions manual has an error. It should be LnK=.59, so the .59 is not actually subtracted.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:06 am
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:06 am
Return to “Arrhenius Equation, Activation Energies, Catalysts”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest