Hey! I'm having a bit of trouble deciding which equation(s) to use in order to figure out this problem from the post-module assessment. It seems like I have to do this in several steps, however I'm not sure where to start.
28. Light hits a sodium metal surface and the velocity of the ejected electron is 6.61 x 105 m.s-1. The work function for sodium is 150.6 kJ.mol-1.
A. What is the kinetic energy of the ejected electron?
Post-Mod Problem #28
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
Re: Post-Mod Problem #28
You know that E(photon) - E(energy to remove e-) = E(kinetic energy of e-). You also know that E(photon) = h(planck's constant) x v (frequency)
In other words, hv - work function = (1/2)mv^2
(where m = mass of e- and v = velocity of e-)
Mass of e- = 9.11E-31, Given velocity = 6.61E5
This would then lead to E(kinetic energy of e-) = (1/2)mv^2
Plug in the values to get (1/2)(9.11E-31)(6.61E5)^2 = 1.99E-19 J.
In other words, hv - work function = (1/2)mv^2
(where m = mass of e- and v = velocity of e-)
Mass of e- = 9.11E-31, Given velocity = 6.61E5
This would then lead to E(kinetic energy of e-) = (1/2)mv^2
Plug in the values to get (1/2)(9.11E-31)(6.61E5)^2 = 1.99E-19 J.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:03 am
Re: Post-Mod Problem #28
Hi! I'm still confused about how that got us the answer. I understand the equations we're supposed to use and where everything goes but the one part I am still confused about is the work function.
If the work function is 150.6 KJ, shouldn't we first convert that to joules which would be 1.506x10^-5.
Then to my understanding aren't we supposed to use
total energy (c=lamda*v) - work energy = Ek (.5MV^2) ?
If that's the case, wouldn't we add the work energy to Ek for the answer?
I am still new to this so I am simply trying to gain a firmer grasp on the manipulation of equations.
If the work function is 150.6 KJ, shouldn't we first convert that to joules which would be 1.506x10^-5.
Then to my understanding aren't we supposed to use
total energy (c=lamda*v) - work energy = Ek (.5MV^2) ?
If that's the case, wouldn't we add the work energy to Ek for the answer?
I am still new to this so I am simply trying to gain a firmer grasp on the manipulation of equations.
Return to “Photoelectric Effect”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests