Lines in the Balmer series of the hydrogen spectrum are observed at 653.6, 486.1, 434.0, and 410.2 nm. What is the wavelength of the next line in the series?
I am totally lost on this question. How would I find the wavelength of the next line in this series?
1.57 [ENDORSED]
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:59 pm
Re: 1.57
The wavelengths listed correspond to the different wavelengths an electron can absorb at each energy level (i.e. 653.6 nm for n = 1, 486.1 for n = 2, etc.). Since it's asking for the next wavelength in the series, you would need to find the energy difference of the electron at n = 5 since you're given 4 wavelengths. Use
to find the energy difference at n = 5 and then plug what you get for energy into
and then solve for wavelength.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:59 pm
Re: 1.57 [ENDORSED]
For the Balmer series, the final energy level is always n=2. So, the wavelengths 653.6, 486.1, 434.0, and 410.2 nm correspond to n=3, n=4, n=5, and n=6 respectively. Since the last wavelength, 410.2 nm, corresponds to n=6, the next wavelength should logically correspond to n=7.
To solve for the wavelength, calculate the individual energies, E2 and E7, using E=-hR/(n^2). Then, calculate the energy difference between E2 (which is the final) and E7 (which is the initial). Finally, use lamba=hc/E to get the wavelength.
To solve for the wavelength, calculate the individual energies, E2 and E7, using E=-hR/(n^2). Then, calculate the energy difference between E2 (which is the final) and E7 (which is the initial). Finally, use lamba=hc/E to get the wavelength.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:00 am
Re: 1.57
@Kevin Tam 1D
I tried your method, but got 511nm instead of 397nm (the answer in the back of the book). But I agree with your logic...so I'm puzzled too.
@Preston_Dang_1C
I also tried your method just for comparison and got 434nm, which once again, isn't the correct answer of 397nm.
What are we missing here?
I tried your method, but got 511nm instead of 397nm (the answer in the back of the book). But I agree with your logic...so I'm puzzled too.
@Preston_Dang_1C
I also tried your method just for comparison and got 434nm, which once again, isn't the correct answer of 397nm.
What are we missing here?
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 2:57 pm
Re: 1.57
I am also lost on this question and when I used the two solutions given, the answers were not right. Is there any other clearer explanation to help solve this problem?
Re: 1.57
Kevin is correct, but maybe I can help be a little bit clearer!
The Balmer series corresponds to transitions from the n=2 state. Therefore:
656.6 nm corresponds to the transition from n=2 to n=3
486.1 nm corresponds to the transition from n=2 to n=4
434.0 nm: n=2 n=5
410.2 nm: n=2 to n=6
We are trying to find the transition from the n=2 to n=7 case. Remember, after finding the energy difference, the answer we get is in joules. This answer is the energy of light so we have to change energy of the photon into wavelength
The Balmer series corresponds to transitions from the n=2 state. Therefore:
656.6 nm corresponds to the transition from n=2 to n=3
486.1 nm corresponds to the transition from n=2 to n=4
434.0 nm: n=2 n=5
410.2 nm: n=2 to n=6
We are trying to find the transition from the n=2 to n=7 case. Remember, after finding the energy difference, the answer we get is in joules. This answer is the energy of light so we have to change energy of the photon into wavelength
Return to “Bohr Frequency Condition, H-Atom , Atomic Spectroscopy”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest