Good afternoon,
I was confused on question 6 from the homework because for the wavelength range in nanonometers do you plug in 6 and 1 into Rydberg's formula 1/λ = RZ^2(1/n1^2 - 1/n2^2) for the longest gap and then 6 and 5 in for the shortest gap?
Rydberg Formula
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:43 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Rydberg Formula
Hi, you're right! That's how I solved this equation.
Using v=R[1/n12-1/n22], I first input n1=5 with n2=6, and then I input n1=1 with n2=6.
I initially kept getting this question wrong, but I realized it was because of a mistake with the Sig Figs that Sapling used... the only way it accepted my answer was when I used only one sigfig for my minimum wavelength two for my maximum wavelength.
I don't know if everyone had that issue or just me though!
Using v=R[1/n12-1/n22], I first input n1=5 with n2=6, and then I input n1=1 with n2=6.
I initially kept getting this question wrong, but I realized it was because of a mistake with the Sig Figs that Sapling used... the only way it accepted my answer was when I used only one sigfig for my minimum wavelength two for my maximum wavelength.
I don't know if everyone had that issue or just me though!
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:47 pm
Re: Rydberg Formula
Arielle Sass 1L wrote:Hi, you're right! That's how I solved this equation.
Using v=R[1/n12-1/n22], I first input n1=5 with n2=6, and then I input n1=1 with n2=6.
I initially kept getting this question wrong, but I realized it was because of a mistake with the Sig Figs that Sapling used... the only way it accepted my answer was when I used only one sigfig for my minimum wavelength two for my maximum wavelength.
I don't know if everyone had that issue or just me though!
What did you put in for 'R'
In the book it says 3.29*10^15 but on the homework it was saying to put 1.09*10^7 so i was confused
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:43 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Rydberg Formula
Use the value 3.29x10^15 Hz for Rydberg's formula when using the equation v=R[1/n12-1/n22]. I noticed that the equation you used was "1/λ = RZ^2(1/n1^2 - 1/n2^2) and so maybe for that equation, R is different (though I've never seen that equation so I don't exactly know where it comes from). But when using the equation I mentioned before, which is the equation Dr. L gave to us so I'd recommend using that one, R should be 3.29x10^15.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:51 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Rydberg Formula
When using the equation 1/λ = RZ^2(1/n1^2 - 1/n2^2) , you would plug in R=1.097 x 10^7/m.
When using the equation v=R[1/n12-1/n22, you would plug in R= 3.29 x 10^15 Hz.
I think there are different variations because the units are different.
I found that this question was also asked on Chem Community in 2014. Here's the link: viewtopic.php?t=4054
hope this helps!
When using the equation v=R[1/n12-1/n22, you would plug in R= 3.29 x 10^15 Hz.
I think there are different variations because the units are different.
I found that this question was also asked on Chem Community in 2014. Here's the link: viewtopic.php?t=4054
hope this helps!
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:03 pm
Re: Rydberg Formula
There are different variations of R online and in the textbook, but the one the professor gave us is relative to frequency, R=3.29*10^15.
-
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:47 pm
Re: Rydberg Formula
AnnaNovoselov1G wrote:When using the equation 1/λ = RZ^2(1/n1^2 - 1/n2^2) , you would plug in R=1.097 x 10^7/m.
When using the equation v=R[1/n12-1/n22, you would plug in R= 3.29 x 10^15 Hz.
I think there are different variations because the units are different.
I found that this question was also asked on Chem Community in 2014. Here's the link: viewtopic.php?t=4054
hope this helps!
thank you this was helpful!
Return to “General Science Questions”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests