You use an electron microscope in which the matter wave associated with the electron beam has a wavelength of 0.0403 nm. What is the kinetic energy of an electron in the beam, expressed in electron volts?
My work:
Lambda= 0403 nm = 4.03 m x10^-11
m = 9.109 x 10^31kg
v = (h/lambda)/ mass
v = (6.62608 x 10^-34/ 4.03 x 10^-11)/ 9.109 x 10^-31 = .18 x 10^8
Ek = 1/2 (mv)^2
Ek = 1/2 (9.109 x 10^-34 g) * (.18 x 10^8)^2
Ek= .82 x 10^-18
1 eV = 1.602 x 10 ^-19
So....
Ek= .82 x 10^-18 / 1.602 x 10 ^-19 = .512 x 10^1
My Answer is incorrect = .512 x 10^1 eV
What am I doing wrong?
Achieve HW (Weeks 2-4) :Question# 15
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2023 12:06 pm
Re: Achieve HW (Weeks 2-4) :Question# 15
For that question, my book says the wavelength is 0.0287nm instead. But what I did was I used the KE=1/2mv^2 equation and rearranged lambda=h/p to v=h/lambda*m and then I substituted it into the equation for KE and from that I got the joules then from there converted it into eV. Hope this helps! I think it may be wrong because you put the wrong wavelength
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2023 12:03 pm
Re: Achieve HW (Weeks 2-4) :Question# 15
This doesn't make sense since v = (h/lambda)/ mass is the same as v = (h) /(lambda *mass), they are just arranged differently. Also, how is my wavelength wrong?
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2023 12:06 pm
Re: Achieve HW (Weeks 2-4) :Question# 15
I don't know, but that's what I did and I got the correct answer. I used the equations to put what information I did have in terms of v so I was able to solve for the answer. The wavelength is not what you wrote down. At least in my book it doesn't have the same wavelength you have.
Return to “DeBroglie Equation”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests