CHEMISTRY COMMUNITY

So, according to the DeBroglie Equation, whether something has wavelike properties or not is dependent on how small it's wavelength is, correct?
What is the threshold number of wavelength that separates those with wavelike properties to those without?

According to the lecture, all moving particles with momentum have wavelike properties, but the wavelike properties are only noticed for objects with small mass and high velocity. Professor Lavelle also stated a baseball has wavelike properties but the wavelength is so small it is smaller than what is able to be detected. I am not sure if there is a certain threshold wavelength that separates those with wavelike properties to those without, but as long as the wavelength is reasonable in terms of atoms and electrons, it would be considered to have wavelike characteristics.

The previous answer is completely correct. I just wanted to add that there was a sort of threshold, or limit, to the wavelengths that detectors can actually measure in real life, which I think was around 10^-10 m.

All objects give off wavelength particles, as De Broglie's equation can apply to any object with momentum, or mass and velocity. However, some objects are way too big to give off noticeable wavelike properties, as the wavelengths are often extremely small. Professor Lavelle stated that the "threshold" that we see objects is around 10^-13 meters, but wavelengths such as 10^10 m are much more observable.

A homework de Broglie question gave us the velocity and asked to find wavelength. When I first tried it, I tried finding KE but it did not work out. Then I used de Broglie which was much easier, but my question is is that when we are given a velocity, how can we decipher if it is KE question of de Broglie question?