HW Question 1.B.25


Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

605379296
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2019 12:16 am

HW Question 1.B.25

Postby 605379296 » Mon Oct 14, 2019 10:35 pm

For this problem, I got delta p as greater than or equal to 1.51*10^-25. However, when I try to find delta v, the solution manual states to multiply by 1/2, so it looks like this: .5((1.5*10^-34)/(9.1*10^-31)(350*10^-12))= 1.65*10^5 m/s. Again, why would you multiply that by .5? Isn't the original formula just [delta v= delta p/m]?

William Chan 1D
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:15 am

Re: HW Question 1.B.25

Postby William Chan 1D » Tue Oct 15, 2019 12:30 am

The equation is ΔpΔx ≥ 1/2 ℏ.

Not that ℏ is equal to h/2π, so in essence, ΔpΔx is equal to h /π, or 1/2 ( h/2π ). I think this is where the other 1/2 came from.

205150314
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:16 am

Re: HW Question 1.B.25

Postby 205150314 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:45 pm

605379296 wrote:For this problem, I got delta p as greater than or equal to 1.51*10^-25. However, when I try to find delta v, the solution manual states to multiply by 1/2, so it looks like this: .5((1.5*10^-34)/(9.1*10^-31)(350*10^-12))= 1.65*10^5 m/s. Again, why would you multiply that by .5? Isn't the original formula just [delta v= delta p/m]?


Where did the 350*10^m/s come from?

Paul Hage 2G
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 12:17 am

Re: HW Question 1.B.25

Postby Paul Hage 2G » Wed Oct 16, 2019 3:21 pm

The 350 x 10^-12m/s came from the conversion from picometers to meters. 1pm=10^-12m.


Return to “Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests