HW Question 1.B.25
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
HW Question 1.B.25
For this problem, I got delta p as greater than or equal to 1.51*10^-25. However, when I try to find delta v, the solution manual states to multiply by 1/2, so it looks like this: .5((1.5*10^-34)/(9.1*10^-31)(350*10^-12))= 1.65*10^5 m/s. Again, why would you multiply that by .5? Isn't the original formula just [delta v= delta p/m]?
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:15 am
Re: HW Question 1.B.25
The equation is ΔpΔx ≥ 1/2 ℏ.
Not that ℏ is equal to h/2π, so in essence, ΔpΔx is equal to h /π, or 1/2 ( h/2π ). I think this is where the other 1/2 came from.
Not that ℏ is equal to h/2π, so in essence, ΔpΔx is equal to h /π, or 1/2 ( h/2π ). I think this is where the other 1/2 came from.
Re: HW Question 1.B.25
605379296 wrote:For this problem, I got delta p as greater than or equal to 1.51*10^-25. However, when I try to find delta v, the solution manual states to multiply by 1/2, so it looks like this: .5((1.5*10^-34)/(9.1*10^-31)(350*10^-12))= 1.65*10^5 m/s. Again, why would you multiply that by .5? Isn't the original formula just [delta v= delta p/m]?
Where did the 350*10^m/s come from?
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 12:17 am
Re: HW Question 1.B.25
The 350 x 10^-12m/s came from the conversion from picometers to meters. 1pm=10^-12m.
Return to “Heisenberg Indeterminacy (Uncertainty) Equation”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests