Page 1 of 1

Quantum Number l exception

Posted: Sat Oct 21, 2017 11:08 pm
by Jason Muljadi 2C
We presume that, to find l, it is literally (n-1), correct? Now, would the only exception be when n is at an s-orbital, like 2s, 3s, or 4s? For instance, at 2s, isn't l = 0 because there's not really an orbital angular momentum until we reach 2p?

Re: Quantum Number l exception

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 10:26 am
by Eryn Wilkinson 3H
The value of l is a maximum of (n-1), so it can be all numbers up to that value. If the subshell is an s orbital, l is always 0, because the s orbital can only hold 2 electrons and therefore does not have any smaller subdivisions. So if you look at the energy levels, n=1 can only have an s orbital (1s), while n=3 can have s, p, and d orbitals (3s,3p,3d).

Re: Quantum Number l exception

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:18 pm
by Vincent Kim 2I
The value of l is also not just (n-1), but can also include the negatives numbers too. For s: l can only be 0, while for p: l can be -1, 0, and 1.

Re: Quantum Number l exception  [ENDORSED]

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2017 9:27 pm
by Jonathan Tangonan 1E
Just to clarify I believe that the l quantum number is going to be positive. The ml or the magnetic quantum number is when you will start getting negatives where for example where l=1, ml can be -1, 0, or 1.

Re: Quantum Number l exception

Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:47 pm
by Chem_Mod
That is correct. L will never be negative.