expected electron configuration of chromium [ENDORSED]
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am
expected electron configuration of chromium
Why is the expected electron configuration for chromium different from the observed electron configuration? The expected configuration is [Ar]4s2,3d4 and the observed configuration is [Ar]4s1,3d5.
-
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 3:01 am
Re: expected electron configuration of chromium [ENDORSED]
Chromium acts like an exception in the sense that 3d5 is a more stable configuration than 3d4, the reason being that an exactly half filled sub-shell is partially full is more stable than a partially sub-shell. As a result, an electron from the 4s orbital is excited and rises to the 3d orbital.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am
Re: expected electron configuration of chromium
For similar reasons, Copper is also an exception to that normal electron configuration rule. Its electron configuration is [Ar]4s1,3d10. A completely filled sub-shell will be more stable than a partially filled one.
Re: expected electron configuration of chromium
Are copper and chromium the only elements that are like this?
Return to “Wave Functions and s-, p-, d-, f- Orbitals”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests