P-Orbital

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

alyssawhite1L
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:05 am

P-Orbital

Postby alyssawhite1L » Mon Oct 23, 2017 12:40 pm

For the P-orbital, we use the subscripts x,y, and z. In class, he said something about how these only work if we explicitly define each level as x, y, and z. Does this mean we can use other symbols instead of these to define the different sets of electrons?

Chem_Mod
Posts: 17949
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
Has upvoted: 406 times

Re: P-Orbital

Postby Chem_Mod » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:11 pm

Yes, you could in theory. However, x, y, and z are the standard labeling conventions for the different p orbitals.

Salman Azfar 1K
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2017 3:00 am

Re: P-Orbital

Postby Salman Azfar 1K » Tue Oct 24, 2017 4:53 pm

Like the answer above said, I'm pretty sure changing them up would be okay. At the same time however, I think we are trying to imply viewing things in three dimensions in which case the most logical variables to use are x, y, and z as you would for a 3 dimensional set of coordinates.

Mishta Stanislaus 1H
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:04 am

Re: P-Orbital

Postby Mishta Stanislaus 1H » Sun Oct 29, 2017 10:14 pm

Just a reiteration, but yes you could switch those variables. They serve the purpose of showing the orbital is three dimensional.

Sarah Brauer
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:06 am

Re: P-Orbital

Postby Sarah Brauer » Fri Nov 03, 2017 12:09 am

Would we have to know the sub orbitals for d and f?

Jasmin Tran 1J
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:00 am

Re: P-Orbital

Postby Jasmin Tran 1J » Fri Nov 03, 2017 3:18 am

In response to your questions about d and f, I don't think we would have to know the exact ones since there are so many and since they are also harder to draw than the p orbital


Return to “Quantum Numbers and The H-Atom”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest