Textbook 2A.13(c)

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Tiffany 3F
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2023 12:03 pm
Been upvoted: 1 time

Textbook 2A.13(c)

Postby Tiffany 3F » Mon Nov 06, 2023 10:06 pm

The question asks to predict the type of orbital (1s, 2p, 3d, 4f, etc.) from which an electron will need to be removed to form the +1 ions. For (c), why is Al+ in the 3p orbital and not in the 3s orbital even though it is subtracting an electron?

Jenna Jabourian 2C
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2023 12:20 pm

Re: Textbook 2A.13(c)

Postby Jenna Jabourian 2C » Mon Nov 06, 2023 10:11 pm

This is because Al is in the p subshell on the periodic table. For this reason in the electron configuration, 3p comes after 3s so an electron would be removed from the 3p orbital to form the +1 ion.

Ariana 1D
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2023 8:22 am

Re: Textbook 2A.13(c)

Postby Ariana 1D » Wed Nov 15, 2023 3:45 pm

I think in this case, it will be removed from the p-orbital instead of the s-orbital because the removal of an electron from the p orbital will leave the atom with a full orbital (3s). Whereas, if we remove the electron from the s-orbital, the atom will be left will one electron in 3s and one electron in 3p and it is less stable.


Return to “Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests