Why isn't Vanadium an exception?

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Mario Reyes 1C
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:04 am

Why isn't Vanadium an exception?

Postby Mario Reyes 1C » Sun May 06, 2018 9:23 pm

I understand why Chromium and Copper are exceptions using the symmetry argument. However, why isn't Vanadium an exception as well? The configuration for Vanadium is [Ar]3d^3 4s^2. Why don't the 2 electrons from 4s go to 3d to fill the d orbital?

Jose Lupian 1C
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 11:03 am

Re: Why isn't Vanadium an exception?

Postby Jose Lupian 1C » Sun May 06, 2018 10:23 pm

I believe that the exceptions to electron configuration involve only moving one electron into the S orbital in order to make the d orbital stable. This is done when the d orbital is half full or full. In your example, Vanadium requires two electrons to be moved and not one.

Chem_Mod
Posts: 17827
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:53 pm
Has upvoted: 405 times

Re: Why isn't Vanadium an exception?

Postby Chem_Mod » Sun May 06, 2018 10:24 pm

It is just not energetically favorable enough to remove 2 electrons from the 4s and move them in parallel spins to 3d orbitals. Although the symmetry is achieved, it's just not energetically favorable.


Return to “Electron Configurations for Multi-Electron Atoms”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest