Ionic Radius

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Stevin1H
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:17 am

Ionic Radius

Postby Stevin1H » Fri Nov 02, 2018 9:40 pm

Why is it that a Ca^2+ ion is smaller than a Na+ ion?

Patrick Cai 1L
Posts: 93
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am

Re: Ionic Radius

Postby Patrick Cai 1L » Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:18 am

The Z-effective of Ca 2+ is greater than that of Na+, which is to say the electrostatic attraction between the remaining electrons of Ca 2+ and protons of the nucleus eclipses the electrostatic interaction measured in Na+.

Dayna Pham 1I
Posts: 98
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:16 am
Been upvoted: 3 times

Re: Ionic Radius

Postby Dayna Pham 1I » Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:40 am

Hi, Stevin!

I recall someone said that this is because of the proton to electron ratio. I don't understand it in full, but this is along the lines of what I remember...

Ca2+ has 22 electrons and 20 protons, while Na+ has 10 electrons and 11 protons.

I guess since calcium as a cation has the most charge and can pull in electrons stronger than the sodium cation?

Douglas Nguyen 2J
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:15 am

Re: Ionic Radius

Postby Douglas Nguyen 2J » Sat Nov 03, 2018 9:22 am

Stevin1H wrote:Why is it that a Ca^2+ ion is smaller than a Na+ ion?


An [Na]+ ion has 11 protons and 10 electrons whereas [Ca]2+ has 20 protons and 18 electrons. Although the periodic trends dictate that as you go down a group, the atomic radius increases due to increased shielding and energy levels, the Z-effective of [Ca]2+ denotes greater pull on the calcium electrons in comparison to sodium's electrostatic attraction to its own electrons.


Return to “Trends in The Periodic Table”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests