### In Class Example, Re: radicals, NO

Posted:

**Sun May 13, 2018 10:07 pm**In class we were given the example of NO and the Lewis structure given the formal charge. Although we were not given the formal charge, we end up with N+ and O-, and because of that we know to fill O and leave N with only five e- dots. However, we are given the counterexample where the reverse is done. O only has 5 e- dots and N is filled which then gives us the charges: N- and O+2. My question is why is the counterexample incorrect?