Does the formula...
FC = group # - (bonds + nonbinding e-)
work the same as the one presented in lecture? This formula makes more sense to me and seems to result in all the same results.
Alternative version of formula
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
Re: Alternative version of formula
Yes, I use that same formula as well. The 1/2 part in the formula is just used to account for the bonds. Your formula works just the same.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:15 am
Re: Alternative version of formula
Yes, your formula work, but I prefer to use FC = Valence Electrons - (Lone Electrons + Shared Electrons/2)
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:26 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Alternative version of formula
What works for me is: Formal Charge = Valence Electrons - (Dots + Dashes). Dots representing number of electrons that are unbounded and dashes representing the number of bonds.
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am
Re: Alternative version of formula
Yes it works, use whatever formula you're most comfortable with, but understand what the formula presented means.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:27 am
Re: Alternative version of formula
Dr. Lavelle uses FC=valence electrons - (free electrons + bound electrons/2) because it helps us to understand that each line, or bond, in the Lewis structure represents 2 electrons. You can also use FC=valence electrons - (dots+lines) though because counting each line is the same thing as multiplying each line by 2 to get the amount of electrons and then dividing it by two in the equation. The bottom line is that we should be memorizing concepts not equations.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:27 am
Re: Alternative version of formula
You can use both, but make sure you understand why they both work! The "dashes" represent bonds, which in the lecture formula is represented by the /2, so the numbers will come out the same for this reason.
-
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:23 am
Re: Alternative version of formula
Yes, they both work and I think your formula is much easier to remember and use.
Return to “Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests