Most Favorable Placement of Formal Charges


Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

annabel 2A
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:18 am

Most Favorable Placement of Formal Charges

Postby annabel 2A » Mon Nov 26, 2018 9:27 pm

is it more favorable to have formal charges spread out or to have them concentrated? For example, for N3- is it more favorable for one of the formal charges to be [2-, 1+, 0] or [1-, 1+, 1-]? or are neither of them the best one?

Ronald Thompson 1F
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:25 am

Re: Most Favorable Placement of Formal Charges

Postby Ronald Thompson 1F » Mon Nov 26, 2018 9:29 pm

I believe for the purposes of this class the spread of the charges doesn't quite matter. I do not recall coming across a problem where the two possibilities have the same formal charge.

Danielle_Gallandt3I
Posts: 70
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 12:24 am

Re: Most Favorable Placement of Formal Charges

Postby Danielle_Gallandt3I » Mon Nov 26, 2018 9:44 pm

It depends on the situation. It is better to have them concentrated if one molecule is much more electronegative than the other, because it would not make sense for electrons to be more electrostatically attracted to something like hydrogen over something like oxygen. Another thing to consider,, however, is that you typically want the lowest average formal charge, in which case (+1, 0, -1) makes more sense. This is not a hard and fast rule though, because a lot of the placement of electrons is dependent on the atoms within each molecule and their specific characteristics.


Return to “Formal Charge and Oxidation Numbers”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest