Page 1 of 1

Molecular Shape vs. Molecular Geometry

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 9:38 pm
by Hiba Alnajjar_2C
Could somebody clarify the difference between molecular shape and molecular geometry? In high school, I had learned it as electron geometry & molecular geometry so I would appreciate clarification about the difference. Does molecular shape treat bonds and lone pairs as the same, whereas molecular geometry makes a distinction between the structure if a bonding pair is replaced with a lone pair? Thanks in advance

Re: Molecular Shape vs. Molecular Geometry

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:32 pm
by Victoria Li 1L
Geometry refers to the arrangements of regions of electron density around an atom (a.k.a. coordination number; lone pairs + bonds). Shape doesn't account for lone pairs.

Re: Molecular Shape vs. Molecular Geometry

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:41 pm
by jisulee1C
If there are no lone pairs then the molecular shape is the same as the molecular geometry. In the geometry the arrangement considers a bonded electron pair the same as a lone pair of electrons. The geometry will be either linear, trigonal planar, tetrahedral, trigonal bipyramidal, or octahedral.

Re: Molecular Shape vs. Molecular Geometry

Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2019 10:58 pm
by Haley Chun 4H
Geometry would be the parent shapes: linear, trig planar, tetrahedral, trigonal pyramidal, octahedral. The shape would be like bent, see-saw, etc.

Re: Molecular Shape vs. Molecular Geometry

Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:51 pm
by Aedra Li 3H
Shape takes into consideration the electron repulsion that a lone pair would cause.