Table 17.4  [ENDORSED]

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Grace Boyd 2F
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:01 am

Table 17.4

Postby Grace Boyd 2F » Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:25 pm

For some of the anionic ligands, they have more than one name in table 17.4. Can we use either name, or is one preferred over the other? For example, CN- has both isocyano and cyanido-KN. Should we be prepared to know both names?

Jasmine Wu 1L
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:00 am
Been upvoted: 1 time

Re: Table 17.4

Postby Jasmine Wu 1L » Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:28 pm

Hi :)

Both versions would be acceptable- my TA said so. Also, on Dr. Lavelle's class site, there's a file on there called "Naming Coordination Compounds" and it's got those anionic compounds you were talking about on there. On the top of the 2nd page of that document, it says that for the name with a *, that name is used for the class, but Dr. Lavelle will accept both. So, as you mentioned, for CN- both names would work. Check out that document, and I hope it helps!

Cassandra Mullen 1E
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am
Been upvoted: 2 times

Re: Table 17.4  [ENDORSED]

Postby Cassandra Mullen 1E » Sat Nov 25, 2017 7:15 pm

The k is kappa and the chemical symbol written next to it denotes which atom is linked to the metal atom, just to avoid ambiguity. If you do choose to use this method, you can also underline the element.


Return to “Naming”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests