Table 17.4 [ENDORSED]
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:01 am
Table 17.4
For some of the anionic ligands, they have more than one name in table 17.4. Can we use either name, or is one preferred over the other? For example, CN- has both isocyano and cyanido-KN. Should we be prepared to know both names?
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2017 3:00 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Table 17.4
Hi :)
Both versions would be acceptable- my TA said so. Also, on Dr. Lavelle's class site, there's a file on there called "Naming Coordination Compounds" and it's got those anionic compounds you were talking about on there. On the top of the 2nd page of that document, it says that for the name with a *, that name is used for the class, but Dr. Lavelle will accept both. So, as you mentioned, for CN- both names would work. Check out that document, and I hope it helps!
Both versions would be acceptable- my TA said so. Also, on Dr. Lavelle's class site, there's a file on there called "Naming Coordination Compounds" and it's got those anionic compounds you were talking about on there. On the top of the 2nd page of that document, it says that for the name with a *, that name is used for the class, but Dr. Lavelle will accept both. So, as you mentioned, for CN- both names would work. Check out that document, and I hope it helps!
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:07 am
- Been upvoted: 2 times
Re: Table 17.4 [ENDORSED]
The k is kappa and the chemical symbol written next to it denotes which atom is linked to the metal atom, just to avoid ambiguity. If you do choose to use this method, you can also underline the element.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests