cyano v. cyanido

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

LNgo 1G
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 12:16 am

cyano v. cyanido

Postby LNgo 1G » Fri Dec 06, 2019 5:11 pm

When would you use the -o ending versus the -ido ending when naming ligands? In the practice problems I saw both of them in different examples in the case of the cyanide molecule and cannot tell when to use one or the other.

chemboi
Posts: 101
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:16 am

Re: cyano v. cyanido

Postby chemboi » Fri Dec 06, 2019 5:27 pm

Both are valid, cyanido is in correspondence with new IUPAC naming conventions. Textbook uses this new convention, but in lecture Dr. Lavelle has used the old system. I guess whichever you choose to use, stay consistent with it.

Sanjana Borle 2K
Posts: 111
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:15 am

Re: cyano v. cyanido

Postby Sanjana Borle 2K » Fri Dec 06, 2019 5:37 pm

cyano and cynanido essentially mean the same thing; I believe Lavelle accepts both on his tests, but uses the cyano. For more information refer to the Coordination Compounds pdf on his Chem 14A website.

Emily_4B
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2019 12:21 am

Re: cyano v. cyanido

Postby Emily_4B » Fri Dec 06, 2019 6:57 pm

Both terms will be accepted on the final as they are simply different naming conventions as previously mentioned. Cyanido being the newer convention.

Bradley Whitworth 4B
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 12:17 am

Re: cyano v. cyanido

Postby Bradley Whitworth 4B » Fri Dec 06, 2019 9:05 pm

With respect to that specific example it doesn't matter whether you use cyano or cyanido.


Return to “Naming”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests