naming sphere of influence
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:39 pm
naming sphere of influence
In the case of [Co(NH3)5Cl]ClH2O, why is the second Cl not part of the sphere of influence?
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:08 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: naming sphere of influence
Well I think in this example, the central metal of Co is already full with 6 ligands already, forming an octehdral shape. So it seems like there wouldn't be any room for the second Cl to fit inside the coordination sphere
-
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:39 pm
Re: naming sphere of influence
As Thomas already said, I think that the cobalt already has a full sphere of influence with six bonded ligands.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:35 pm
Re: naming sphere of influence
Hi! In this example, the second Cl is not directly bonded to the metal which leaves it outside of the immediate sphere of influence for the metal atom.
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:59 pm
Re: naming sphere of influence
The cobalt already has a full sphere of influence meaning the second Cl can't attach to it.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2020 12:16 am
Re: naming sphere of influence
Hi! In this example, the second Cl is not directly bonded to the TM cation but instead bonded to the coordination compound that is formed. This would cause it to be outside the sphere of influence for the cation, and so its name wouldn't be changed in regards to being in the sphere of influence.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest