Textbook 9C.1

Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin

Rachel Kho Disc 2G
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:46 pm

Textbook 9C.1

Postby Rachel Kho Disc 2G » Sat Dec 12, 2020 8:39 pm

For example 9C.1a, why is it called iron ferrate if the overall complex is positive? Is it because iron itself is an exception like gold and silver and copper? Also, when do you know to add ‘ion’ at the end? I thought the rule was that if the overall compound was positive, then you would put ‘ion’ at the end. So why is ‘ion’ added to a) and c) then?

Sara_Lim_2C
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:55 pm

Re: Textbook 9C.1

Postby Sara_Lim_2C » Sat Dec 12, 2020 8:41 pm

The overall complex shown in 9C.1A has a negative 4- charge in my book. It's [Fe(CN)6]^4-. Were you looking at the right problem?

Melanie Lin 3E
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:38 pm

Re: Textbook 9C.1

Postby Melanie Lin 3E » Sat Dec 12, 2020 9:08 pm

Hi Rachel! Same as Sara, the coordination compound has an overall negative charge of -4 in my textbook. And to add, I'm pretty sure you can still call a negatively charged compound as an ion as well, not just positively charged. Hope this helps!


Return to “Naming”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests