Order of Coordination Compounds
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2021 7:23 am
Order of Coordination Compounds
Does the order of a coordination compound matter? For example, would Fe[Na(C2O4)2(H2O)2] be the same thing as Fe[Na(H2O)2(C2O4)2]?
-
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2021 7:02 am
Re: Order of Coordination Compounds
While they are technically the same, you should always consider the ligand names in alphabetical order, as well as consider their charges when determining the order of a coordination compound. That is what Lavelle said to do in lecture, so I believe the correct answer would be Fe[Na(C2O4)2(H2O)2].
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2021 7:16 am
Re: Order of Coordination Compounds
Does it necessarily matter when we are writing out the compound though? Like should we also look to put it in alphabetical order when writing out a compound? Or should we only do it when we are writing out the full name of the compound, not just the symbols?
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:28 am
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Order of Coordination Compounds
I don't think it matters when you're writing out the formula, so long as the transition metal is written first, as seen in both versions. There's a part in the textbook that says to write the chemical symbols out alphabetically though (not the ligand names; e.g. Cl is before OH2 alphabetically), so maybe that's the default?
Also, I think the Na is actually the element outside of the coordination sphere, while Fe is inside the brackets. I think you have it flipped. Hope this helped!
Also, I think the Na is actually the element outside of the coordination sphere, while Fe is inside the brackets. I think you have it flipped. Hope this helped!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests