Consider the reaction of NH3 and I2 to give N2 and HI.
2NH3(g)+3I2(g)↽−−⇀N2(g)+6HI(g)K
Using two or more of the given equations, determine the equilibrium constant, K , for the reaction of NH3 with I2.
H2 (g) +I2 (g) >>> 2HI (g) Ka = 160
I2 (g) >>>2I (g) Kb = 2.1 * 10-3
N2 (g) + 3H2 (g) >>>2NH3 (g) Kc = 3.6 * 10-2
H2 (g) + Cl2 (g) >>> 2HCl (g) Kd = 4.0 * 1018
Could someone explain this please?
Week 1 Sapling 5
Moderators: Chem_Mod, Chem_Admin
-
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 10:01 pm
Re: Week 1 Sapling 5
You need to use the 1st and 3rd equations because these equations can be manipulated to form the initial equation. You need to do 1 over the K of the first equation and raise it to the power of 3 since 3 of the inverse of first equation form one part of the initial equation. For the third equation, you want to also do the inverse, so your new K value is 1/(3.6 x 10^-2). Then multiply the 2 new K values to get the final one for the initial equation.
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:49 pm
-
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:42 pm
- Been upvoted: 1 time
Re: Week 1 Sapling 5
Sahiti Annadata 3D wrote:You need to use the 1st and 3rd equations because these equations can be manipulated to form the initial equation. You need to do 1 over the K of the first equation and raise it to the power of 3 since 3 of the inverse of first equation form one part of the initial equation. For the third equation, you want to also do the inverse, so your new K value is 1/(3.6 x 10^-2). Then multiply the 2 new K values to get the final one for the initial equation.
I was having a lot of trouble with this question as well. Do you disregard the H2 when doing 1/K of the first equation? If so, why are you allowed to do that. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the H2's do not cancel out from Ka and Kb right? Does that impact the solution at all? Thanks!
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:38 pm
Re: Week 1 Sapling 5
luludaly2B wrote:Sahiti Annadata 3D wrote:You need to use the 1st and 3rd equations because these equations can be manipulated to form the initial equation. You need to do 1 over the K of the first equation and raise it to the power of 3 since 3 of the inverse of first equation form one part of the initial equation. For the third equation, you want to also do the inverse, so your new K value is 1/(3.6 x 10^-2). Then multiply the 2 new K values to get the final one for the initial equation.
I was having a lot of trouble with this question as well. Do you disregard the H2 when doing 1/K of the first equation? If so, why are you allowed to do that. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the H2's do not cancel out from Ka and Kb right? Does that impact the solution at all? Thanks!
The H2's should cancel out from Ka and Kb. This would allow you to find the proper final K value of the initial equation.
Return to “Equilibrium Constants & Calculating Concentrations”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests